User talk:Triviallitteratur

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

August 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Leech44. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Resolute 00:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I am not interested in playing games with you. If you persist with the vandalism that your recent edits indicate, you will be blocked. Resolute 00:25, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Now I get it. You are like a vandal or something. Okay, big guy, you win (I simply don't have the persistence to have an edit war with a troll). Your's Triviallitteratur (talk) 00:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "User:Resolute/Sandbox2"
A page you created, User:Resolute/Sandbox2, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jschnur (talk) 00:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Resolute 00:44, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove declined unblock requests or reformat them into new ones, as admins reviewing subsequent requests will need to see them - new requests should be entirely separate, added at the bottom. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Just a note on what we mean by a compromised account. We're not talking about ninjas, LulzSec, or anyone like that - just two or more users having used the same account, with one of them committing vandalism. Now, the thing is, we have no way of knowing which of those people is currently talking to us - it could be an honest person who did not commit any vandalism, or it could be the vandal. We just can't tell, so we have to keep the account closed. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Given the vandal was the one filing unblock notices last night, I think we're really looking at one person who just wanted to play games and tried the "little brother" defence when I blocked them. It's always someone else's fault.  And sorry to burst your bubble Triviallitteratur, but you never upset me.  You demonstrated that your purpose here was to play games rather than build an encyclopedia, and that your games included frequent vandalism - including defamatory posts on living individuals.  I gave you two warnings, then blocked you as a matter of routine administrative action.  Your subsequent responses have served only to further justify the indefinite length of the block.  If you do follow the instructions that Fluffernutter left, I suggest that you focus your next attempt at getting unblocked on your own behaviour and how you intend to correct it. Resolute 19:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)