User talk:Triwbe/Archive1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! King Lopez Contribs 09:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

EP buildings
Hi, thanks for your contributions to the Buildings of the European Parliament page, it needs it (particuarly on Luxembourg). But could you give some refs if you can as it is dealing with obscure buildings in some cases. For instance, I know they look rather finished but the refed figure already up has completion of D4&D5 as 2008, is D4 finished by July? If so I think we could state that more clearly. Also, what Commission buildings are in Luxembourg? It is supposed to be totally based in Luxembourg, if that is not the case then there are a lot of articles to correct. Thanks for your time -JLogan 20:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The commission is split between Brussels and Luxembourg, with certain departments becomming more autonomous, e.g. Eurostat and Translation. I added references for these buildings.Triwbe 16:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

EUYO
Thanks for your additions with regards to the EU youth orchestra, this is exactly the type of EU culture we are looking for on the EU page. Feel free to start the EUYO article, as you seem to have the relevant knowleodge (much more than me). Arnoutf 20:04, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

EU structure
Hey, you commented on the EU structure discussion before. If you have a spare moment, I'd appreciate it if you could comment on the current idea User:JLogan/JFS as now it is primarily myself and A and that is what we've come up with. Some more voices would be welcome. Thanks! -  J Logan t: 16:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry to bring up the European Union article again, I know it can get tedious. Basically it is about the city table. Small point but we've been wanting to replace it, thus far Lear has been the only one wanting the old and has reverted any changes.

A summery of options has been written up, I'd appreciate it if you'd give a comment. Don't mind what you pick as it will either help convince Lear to compromise for once or it will legitimise what he is doing (if he has support I don't mind, so long as it is not him alone). See here for the summery. If you could pop an opinion I'd be grateful before it turns into 3 pages of "standard content" vs "consensus" again. I understand if you don't want to or don't have time to. Thanks! - J Logan t: 13:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Vandal
Thanks for the revert, much appreciated.  Acroterion  (talk)  19:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism?
You appear to have sent me a message regarding vandalism, in fact my intention was nothing of the sort and if you examine the changes I made several of them were precisely intended to remove scurrilous content from the site you identify. What led to my blanking a page was my attempt to undo an edit I had made, in which I inadvertently identified a particular school class after accidentally saving a draft idea. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bannerman_High_School&oldid=159270207). If you could advise me how to remove reference to that class on this page I would be indebted to you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.210.120 (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you !!!
Thank you very much for dealing with my difficulty on my school page. I very much appreciate this. I will take great care in future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.210.120 (talk) 18:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * As the talk page says, you can easily create a sandbox to make test edits in, then cut and paste to the article when you are happy with the edits. Also, make yourself an account and it will be much easier for people to help you. Triwbe 19:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

bannerman high school
Further to my recent message I had hoped that it would be possible completely to remove http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bannerman_High_School&oldid=159270207 and the reference to a specific class entirely from the archive. This is what I had been trying to achieve with all subsequent editing. Indeed I thought that this is what had happened. I am sorry to be such a nuisance. Thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.210.120 (talk) 19:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * This has to be done with some one with much more power than a meer mortal such as myself. Have a look

at Can I delete particular edits from the page history?

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Triwbe! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.  Snowolf How can I help? 00:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Blanking my own talk page...
... is not vandalism, see WP:VAND. --192.75.48.150 17:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * 1. You do not own the page it is an anonymous users page, Create an account to have your own discussion page.
 * 2. Any edit with out an edit summary is questionable.

Triwbe 17:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's an IP page. It's usually acceptable to remove stale warnings from any IP talk page. More so when it's your own IP ... But anyways, it's not a big deal. You were otherwise doing good work. Please carry on. --192.75.48.150 18:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Appreciated, thanks for communicating. Triwbe 18:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Whoops, that was a mistaken revert. You reverted to a version containing vandalism, and I mistakenly reverted to a vandal's version...stuff like that has been going on on that article for a while; I had to revert really far back. Sorry for the misunderstanding! Love, Ne ra n e i   (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it does...and that article is attracting a heck of a lot of vandalism today! Again, I'm really sorry for the misunderstanding. Love, Ne ra n e i  (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Light
Sorry, but I don't believe you should have reverted my change on light. I changed the spelling of Chritian to Christiaan because if you look at the page christiaan huygens you can see that the latter spelling is correct. My fault for not providing an edit summary, sorry.86.154.196.217 16:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, that is exactly what happened, I checked the wiki liked page spelling, but did not read within the page. I removed the warning, how about creating an account? It makes other editors less trigger happy :-) Triwbe 17:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
for the revert, I appreciate it. Knowledge Of Self |  talk  19:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah shucks, it wern't nuttin. Triwbe 19:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Chubs and Disambiguation
Greetings. Recently, on Tue 16 Oct, I constructed a disambiguation page for the various fish known as chubs. After having done so, I began to contemplate whether that page and the current Chub page might be better named. I posted a discussion on the Chub page but it's not yet received any comment. I noticed from the article's revision history that you had made one or more contributions to the page. Consequently, I thought I might profit from your advice at Talk:Chub#Page title if you have a moment or two to spare. Thanks. &mdash; Dave (Talk | contribs) 03:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Gscshoyru 14:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Triwbe! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 05:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! KipSmithers T/ C 12:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help
Thanks for reverting vandalism on Larrys Creek on October 19. I appreciate your help keeping the article presentable while it was Today's Featured Article very much, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 20:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the user talkpage revert. It was very much appreciated :D AngelOfSadness  talk  02:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Bad Revert
I just want to let you know, your revert was a bad revert because you reverted it to a version that had the purpose of a personal attack directed at a user (me) and his family, and the version you reverted to was also biased and not sourceable. Mawfive 03:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I see, there were 2 vandal editors! Naturally I reverted the edit I found while patrolling, but did not see the vandalism by the previous editor. My priority when reverting is to follow the current vandal to clean up any other mess it may have made (or be making). It was not a bad revert so much as a half revert, i.e. I did revert a vandal's edits but did not check the previous edits for vandalism. Not many people would do either. But you got it, so good on you :-) Triwbe 06:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Please correct my mistake. --Francl 11:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn't mean bad revert, but I just couldn't think of a proper word to put in. I probably would do the same thing too.  So, I thought you would like the reminder to just double check really quick, because I would. Mawfive 04:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Grr!
In the past minute there were three vandlaism edits I went to undo, and each time you got there first!!! Grrr!! In other words, keep up the good work :P Okiefromoklabut I'm not a hick 21:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * AHhhhhh!!! now you've broken my concentration.... :-) Thanks, just lucky I guess :-) Triwbe 21:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I figured as much because I just got a couple reverts in :P Okiefromoklabut I'm not a hick 21:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips!
I removed all the obviously unverifiable material from the page 81.109.115.135 (talk) 17:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)