User talk:Triwbe/Archive4

PLEASE NOTE
I hope you have received my reply regarding your request for deletion of an article I had submitted...Gina Garofano... I have since had a historian repair my untidy submission to wikipedia standards. I'm requesting that you continue to allow this article to exist without cause for deletion. This is article on a notable person that surely will have contributions from other members.

Thanks for understanding my shortcomings being as it was my first submission. From now on I will utilize a historian familiar with wikipedia for possible updates and contributions.

Best, 216.31.159.226 (talk) 19:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry but consensus on the AFD here was clear. --Triwbe (talk) 15:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

LBL Systems speedy deletion
I just posted a new subject on Long Base Line as there was no existing page for this yet. I thought this information was relevant, new and on Wikipedia non-existant.

The information provided was based from the magazine that I am working for, and which is a reference in hydrography. Is this spamming? Not that I am aware of - I though to add information that is useful and that may be completed by others. Hope to clarify this.

Best wishes - Joost

--Joostboers (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I understand but the only reference you gave was for a single business review and the article looked very much like an advertisment. What is needed is reliable 3rd party sources. Some one else agreed with me becase the page has been deleted (not by me). Next time 1. Place a on the page and explain this in the talk page of the article. 2. Find more references to show WP:NPOV. Then you will not have a problem.  --Triwbe (talk) 14:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: Paul Teed
Uggh. This was already addressed by a Wikipedia Admin. I give up. I'm sick of pleading my case every time. It's no use, I just can't compete with the people who scroll the recent changes pages with an iron fist. There needs to be better communication between Admins.

ChuckGreen (talk) 09:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * It is simple, read Notability (people) and Biographies of living persons and think about why multiple editors have not found enough references to keep the article. --Triwbe (talk) 09:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sine Qua Non (Battlestar Galactica)
I have nominated Sine Qua Non (Battlestar Galactica), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Sine Qua Non (Battlestar Galactica). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? dorftrottel (talk) 00:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:FLAG-BIO
Hello, ... I noticed your addition of Articleissues to a recently created article by, who seems to be creating articles about NN actors ... I just thought that you might be interested in the Flag templates that I have created for "questionable" articles, where I provide a stencil for that template in the 3rd Step ... using them may take a little more time, but I have found them to be worth the extra effort ... do you have any comments on them?

Happy Editing! &mdash;  08:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * was just looking and admiring them :-) very useful IMHO. Explains to the editor properly why the article is of concern and points him/her to the WP pages explaining in details. I think I may also use it. Well done. --Triwbe (talk) 09:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi ... I saw you tried to use it on ... unfortunately, you need to copy&paste the stencil from the 1st Step of the appropriate WP:FLAG-xyz protocol and replace "Author-name" ... each one has the appropriate (Guideline) already (Flag-article with no arguments just doesn't cut it ) ... what I usually do is open WP:FLAG-BIO (or whatever) in another browser tab so that I can switch back and forth between them ... and don't forget to flag the author as well ... guess I need to update the instructions. :-) &mdash;151.200.237.53 (talk) 12:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * OK got it. --Triwbe (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thnx fer the accidental snafu ... I've update the documentation to emphasize that they must be substituted, and added a Usage section to the WP:FLAG-/templates documentation that talks about using multiple browser tabs ... I'm also going to give some thought to adding a warning message if they lack the required second argument (Article/Editor-name), like Db does, but that'll have to be a project for Some Other Session. &mdash; 151.200.237.53 (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

BREEAM management
Hi. :) In reviewing CSDs, I came upon the above article which you tagged for WP:CSD, but I can't find the foreign language equivalent in another Wikimedia project. I've tried Google searching for the term and also for some of the language, but haven't come up with a match. If you happen to know where it is, please let me know, and I'll be happy to clean it up. I've removed the tag for now as I haven't been able to verify that it meets the criterion. You are of course more than welcome to put the tag back up with the source encoded. The removal of the tag is not meant to dispute that it meets the criterion, merely to indicate that I can't verify it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * it is on the dutch site (natrually) http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/BREEAM_management but up for deletion, so what does that tell us about the EN site ? :-) --Triwbe (talk) 13:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. :) I'll go ahead and take care of it now. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Flag-article
Hello again, ... Well, Flag-article and Flag-editor both generate an error message if the user forgets to "subst:" the template ... thnx fer making me aware of the problem. :-)

On a related note, now they also populate Category:Flagged articles and Category:Flagged editors ... they may get deleted Real Soon Now, but it may solve one of the problems pointed out by Some Other Editor, i.e., "... then I have to remember to check the article a few days later."

I think that these categories can serve as a community Watchlist that can help share the burden of reviewing "questionable" articles that could still be saved ... what are your thoughts?

Happy Editing! &mdash;  16:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Flag-editor
Hi again ... I see that you used Template:Flag-editor on User talk:Colors8, but it was while I was futzing with it, so that user doesn't show in Category:Flagged editors ... My bad! ... it should work correctly the next time that you use it. :-) Happy Editing! &mdash;  00:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Flag-editor
It work very well, see the respone given on Talk:Association of Black Psychologists. WP:AGF is much easier when you have cooperative feedback. --Triwbe (talk) 06:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I "touched" the article and its Talk page ... don't feel like putting much lipstick on that pig. :-) &mdash;151.200.237.53 (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * NO, I understand, but it got a response from the editor and it gently let him know people are watching. CSD or prod and we could loose a potentially worthy article (hypothetically speaking). --Triwbe (talk) 18:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * That's it, exactly, Grasshopper ... "Hold their hand, don't slap it!" :-)


 * BTW, how do you like the change to "helping hand optional" with the  parameter in the Flag tempplates? &mdash; 151.200.237.53 (talk) 22:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Oldprodfull
Hello again ... have you had a look at Oldprodfull? Would you use it as an administrative tag in spite of the extra overhead? Happy Editing! &mdash;  22:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Phi(re)
if it gets deleted, please send me a copy to samvid30@hotmail.com thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samvidgupta (talk • contribs) 08:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Clonalis House
I edited the original extracts from the website of Clonalis to include a new section of which i am the author. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sallgog (talk • contribs) 14:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes I saw that. --Triwbe (talk) 14:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Midori
I have removed the prod tag from Midori (browser), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! 82.203.170.158 (talk) 16:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem, that's what prods r 4. I still think it should not be there, Alpha testing cannot make it noteworthy and WP:CRYSTAL and all that. We shall see. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triwbe (talk • contribs) 17:28, 4 June 2008


 * That's a PROD that I would have seconded ... glad to see the use of Oldprodfull by Some Other Editor to document that it was contested ... Happy Editing! &mdash;  19:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Triwbe
Hi Triwbe, Thanks for the constructive input. I will get there in time, I hope. Check my updates out if you get a chance, please. I will do more with the [Lau page]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lau_%28band%29 over the next few days. (Arm of Keith (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC))

Nazir Nabaa
Hello again ... FYI, the 3rd Step of WP:FLAG-BIO has an Articleissues boilerplate that you might find handy, and less cluttery ... per your recent edits, I'm adding "npov" to the list. :-) &mdash; 151.200.237.53 (talk) 01:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Stephanie Biddle page what does the page need to be wikified?
I have been working hard to collect the appropriate references and links to add to this page and I want to know how it looks now to be kept from deletion. I am new so I have to ask to learn how to do this correctly. Clinix1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clinix1 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry to drop in uninvited, but FYI, I'm going to 2nd the PROD on . &mdash; 151.200.237.53 (talk) 23:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:FLAG-MOVIE
OK, it made sense to activate this one without feedback ... I'm gonna use it for, and hope that you will find it useful as well ... I've modified Flag-article and Flag-editor to recognize Movies as a (Guideline). &mdash; 151.200.237.53 (talk) 04:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Deletion
Keep in mind that the Asian Club group has just been created, similar to Taipei American School's "Blue & Gold" club. Prowikipedians (talk) 08:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, this is a student-group under the section of Kaohsiung American School. Prowikipedians (talk) 08:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I am keeping this under review, none of them seems to have the required notability, but Notability (schools) seems to be completely ignored and all and every school seems to be allowed, and their groups and clubs (re: Articles for deletion/Blue & Gold). A public newspaper or magazine would need substantial notability to be kept, but a school rag with minimal distribution, no one objects to. Why ? --Triwbe (talk) 09:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This is because schools apply to the section under notability. BTW...I fixed your link. Prowikipedians (talk) 09:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Are we reading the same section ???

Indicators of probable notability

''The following criteria are some indicators of probable notability and indicate that suitable sources almost certainly exist for building the article. If any of the following can be reliably sourced, then the article should not be deleted but allowed to exist as a stub.

1. The school has a notable award or status.

2. The school receiving the highest available official assessment. ''


 * I am not picking out this one, there are hundreds of non-notable scools by this criteria. The page is just a proposal, but I think it goes againts so many other WP:ISNOT sections as well. --Triwbe (talk) 09:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * What do you mean by "the school receiving the highest available official assessment.?" Rephrase please. Prowikipedians (talk) 09:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * It is a quote, read Notability (schools). --Triwbe (talk) 09:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Tell you what. Give me some time to write on this article since I also have other articles to write on. Prowikipedians (talk) 09:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * That is no problem, from the talk pages the schools proposal is nowhere near acceptance. consensus is a long way off, as is shown by Articles for deletion/Blue & Gold and others. --Triwbe (talk) 10:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry to drop in uninvited, but I created WP:FLAG-SCL a few months ago to facilitate articles judged by WP:SCL ... there has never been much interest in it, though, since schools are not A7 speedy deletable candidates, and they usually require a WP:AFD to delete, which is just Too Much effort for some editors ... Happy Editing! &mdash;  15:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, you are welcome. I like the idea of "flagging" 'cause 1) no CSD for schools, 2) WP:PROD will be removed by any savvy editor then 3) WP:AFD would probably be no consensus or merge, which is just as bad 'cause no one can be bothered to actually make the effort to do it (talking about schools here). Flagging at least pokes the editor and may get a reaction, which is more than the other options.--Triwbe (talk) 15:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * " … that's why the templates use a [[Image:Nuvola apps important blue.svg|24px|]] icon instead of a [[Image:Nuvola apps important yellow.svg|24px|]] or [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|24px|]] icon ("Get their attention, but don't frighten them!") … they don't know what's going on, and we're trying to bring them up to speed and guide them, so we need to hold their hands, not slap them …"


 * There was a long period of growth and change in creating WP:FLAG-PROTOCOL, and the addition/changes in the color of the flag icon was accompanied by a campaign to regularize the editor notification message templates for the common Speedy deletion templates (and the courtesy PROD messages), so that they all used the same icon image files (yellow for PRODs, red for CSDs) ... also, the first incarnations were  WARN-xyz, not  FLAG-xyz, and they emphasized CSD over PROD ... I like to think that I've grown since those earlier days. :-)


 * BTW, I've modified Selected filmography to populate Category:Flagged articles as well ... Happy Editing! &mdash;  16:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Shepherd Boats
Shepherd Boats was definitely not a CSD#A1 - I nuked it anyhow, on the grounds that it was realistically an A7, maybe G11. Just for future reference, so to avoid the same mistake on others which might not be so nukable. Wily D 18:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Well now it's gone I cannot see. But I think it has about 2 or 3 words. It must have been expanded after I CSD#A1. --Triwbe (talk) 18:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Institute of Language Logic and Computation
Oops I got the word order round the wrong way so didn't find the original page. I guess it would be best just to delete my entry? --Andyf (talk) 22:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

The Deux (band)
I already erased the page. thanks bye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegump58 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Mayur Public School
Hello This is with reference to the unreferenced advertisement and neutrality of the article Mayur Public School which was in dispute. Editing has been done in order to resolve the issue. kindly visit the page and comment if there is further need of clarifications otherwise please do remove the warnings from the article.

--Amit Bhatnotra (talk) 14:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your good work. Plenty of references; well done, but be careful of Peacock terms which are not permitted. I will review and remove tags now. --Triwbe (talk) 14:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Why am I always deleted
I am a Film & TV actor (Screen Actors Guild) with some 33 films and TV shows under my belt... I am also a stage entertainer since 1990 in the area of the paranormal and have done TV specials/shows in the USA and Japan related to the paranormal. Plus I've been written about in several major publishing company books (not self printed)... And YET every time I try to get something added, it's deleted... --Rgmatthewsjr (talk) 10:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for communicating. I guess no 1. It's autobiographical, see Autobiography. 2, you have to prove that you/he is notable. Every time the article is deleted a reason is given. You have to get the first version of the article up to "Stub" class, see Stub then you will be safe. The bottom line normally comes down to WP:attribution, especially with Biographies of living persons. Get one or two good references then you should be OK. --Triwbe (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Weissmann
Hi Twibe. My bad, it was just that when DeadlyAssassin tried to add a CSD template it broke his page (see: ) &#0149;xytram&#0149; talk pics  14:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Why did you undo my changes???
Every fact on page NCFC Fight Management is accurate and verified through outside sources. If there is something specific you don't trust please let me know and I will verify it. (71.106.209.114 (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC))


 * If you are referring to the edits made by User:Amatannn then you removed the template messages placed in the article with out explaining the edits or improving the article - as was explained in the user talk page. If I thought the facts were not verified I would have said so.--Triwbe (talk) 21:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Norman Giller
Hello Triwbe. Thank you for editing the Norman Giller entry. Your input is most welcome, and the whole of Wikipedia just awesome. I can vouch that all the facts are correct, as I submitted them. The words are not copied and pasted, but freshly 'cooked' for the Wikipedia website. When recently addressing a ladies luncheon on the topic of writing books, one of the audience said rather sarcastically: "You cannot be a very established author because I can find no reference to you in Wikipedia! " Hopefully, with your assistance, I can now put that right and get the recognition that Wikipedia brings. Incidentally, I can trace Samuel Pepys in my ancestry line. I wonder what he would make of Wikipedia! Sammypepys (talk) 01:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC) Norman

Hi Sammy, thank you for your input. You know what I did ? I thought "who is this guy?" - so I googled. Then I thought "blimy, he even has interviews with the BBC, he really did do all this stuff". Then I searched Wikipedia 3 or 4 times because I could not believe there was no article for him or hardly any mention of him already. So good work for you for creating it and writing all that material. No problem of notability or WP:V verifiability here. Then, lastly, the text looked a little too professionally written, so I checked for Internet pages from which it may have been copied (in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy), but I did not find any. So just in case I added the to show my concern, but if you attend book writing luncheons, then that explains the writing quality:-). --Triwbe (talk) 04:38, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

I am guessing, Triwbe, that you are States-based. I truly appreciate the effort you have put in on my behalf. I have now reached the "old git" stage of my life, and many of my generation do not attempt to keep up to date with the hurtling changes of the internet world. I must be honest and admit that I stumble around in Wikipedia like a blind man in a maze. If anything there is too much information about how to edit, and it all just confuses my poor old brain (I have smooth-as-a-baby's-bum hands that have not done a day's work in their life ... but you should see the blisters on my brain). I am waffling. Sorry. Would you like me to upload a photo of myself as further proof that I am THE Norman Giller, of Whom Who's Who says Who? Thanks for taking time out to correspond. You must have better things to do with your time. I have just made a small donation to the Wikipedia fund. I take so much out of Wikipedia that it's only right that I should put something back.Sammypepys (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Just so you know, Triwbe, I have uploaded a Norman Giller photo (Norman_giller_wiki.jpg)‎. I have no doubt made a complete hash of it. Kindest regards Sammypepys (talk) 09:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh my goodness, he does look like a Journo ;-) (Don't ask me what I mean by that, nothing bad I assure you). It is fine. --Triwbe (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

What you mean, Triwbe, is p****d old hack! Thanks for your efforts. Greatly appreciated. It's a beautiful day here in your old country. I think summer may have arrived. :) Sammypepys (talk) 16:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

My last experience with an old hack was actually a younge scottish blonde lassie whom I met in a hotel bar in Bamako a few years ago. He's nothing like her. But she tried to stitch us up, see Glenys Kinnock. Currently I am in Moscow for a few weeks. --Triwbe (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

What a great line, Triwbe: " ... a young Scottish blonde lassie whom I met in a bar in Bamako ..." It could have come out of the mouth of Humphrey Bogart in Casablanca: "Of all the gin-joints in all of the world you have to walk in to this one in Bamako ..." Enjoy Moscow. They will be going mad there tonight for their team in the Euro semi-finals ... :) Sammypepys (talk) 10:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: James Kearns
Hello again, ... Any thoughts this article that I just PRODed?



Happy Editing! &mdash;  15:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stephanie Biddle
An article that you have been involved in editing, Stephanie Biddle, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Stephanie Biddle. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk) 06:21, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Charles Torjo
Well, that was unexpected. Thanks for the "your first article" page, but I've made many articles that contribute. I am a bit surprised at this deletion, considering he is a well known person who has had national awards in his life. I don't see why you really thought it needed to be deleted, and no, it wasn't copyrighted text, I wrote it in my own words. So, uh..I don't really know what to say. I didn't have time to answer you because I was off of my computer. I don't think it was really fair to delete it when I had no chance to reply. Smuckers (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Sorry Smuckers, nothing personal, but now I cannot see the page, so that means some one else agreed with me (I cannot delete pages). Let me see:

14:32, 16 June 2008 deleted "Charles Torjo" ‎ (A7 (bio): Real person; doesn't indicate importance/significance: Article about an a real person, which does not assert notability (CSD A7))

There, so you can ask User:Accounting4Taste for an undelete or a copy of the article and make sure it shows some significance when/if you try again. I don't demand attribution on the first go, just a statment of why some one is notable. --Triwbe (talk) 15:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Theodor Pröpper
I declined based off Theodor Pröpper, which list several works and is a rather complete article on him. I could not in good faith speedy delete the article based off this however if you wish to take it to AfD so be it. –– Lid(Talk) 16:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I checked Theodor Pröpper as well, these are not WP:RS. Anything goes on some Wikis. --Triwbe (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Mark Power
Yes, Power's article is wretched, but unlike a lot of photographers whose articles sport unsourced claims, Power seems to merit the article. All those templates cumulatively make whoever applied them look curiously angry, but I suppose they're justified. I'm tired and hungry and about to turn the computer off for a few hours; could I perhaps interest you in spending thirty minutes of your life on googling for more reliable sources? If you do a bit, that may well inspire me to look for Power in a couple of new and authoritative books about Magnum that I think the local library stocks. -- Hoary (talk) 11:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

When new page patrolling I look at similar articles for useful templates, and when I see such issues, I quickly tag them, nothing personal and it's a shotgun approach I know. So, I cannot refuse a polite request like that - I will try to find something, but I think you have enough already, I removed the tags. --Triwbe (talk) 11:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Umea University (disambiguation)
Hi Twibe,

Hope ya okay :D Noticed this new page, but am unclear if its needed. A redirect is already from Umea University to Umeå University - I'm not sure how ambiguous that name is personally!

Cheers &#0149;xytram&#0149; talk pics  09:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Never mind, someone else has placed a WP:PROD on the article anyway! &#0149;xytram&#0149; talk pics  10:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Ariel Atom
re.: Ariel Atom I removed your "toolong" template, primarily as it was not justified in the talk page. The article is not lengthly. Best wishes, Leonard G. (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Prod
Anyone may remove a prod tag for any reason, and if they do the tag shouldn't be put back into the article. That line about edit summaries isn't a rule, it's a recommendation, a suggestion of courtesy to other editors; at no point does it say that if somebody removes a prod tag without explaining why, they should be reverted. That would be counterproductive with regards to the intended uncontroversial nature of proposed deletion. --Closedmouth (talk) 03:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Charles Hiram Burnett Jr.
Would a Mayor of Edinburgh who presided at the opening of it's single largest tourist attraction be non notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardBond (talk • contribs) 08:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

If he failed Notability (people) then yes. WP does not go by individual knowledge, so making a comparison is pretty meaningless. Wikipedia demands WP:attribution through references to notability. I think Charles Hiram Burnett Jr. is notable, that is why the article was not deleted under speedy deletions, but it is still your jobs to show it. You may have done so by now, I do not review every article constantly. --Triwbe (talk) 08:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Articles by Colors8
Hello again, ... please see User talk:151.200.237.53 for a checklist that I just created ... why don't I start at the top of the list, and you can start at the bottom, and we'll add Flag-article to their talk pages ... I suggest that the list be used for a single message to replace multiple instances of Flag-editor ... Happy Editing! &mdash;  12:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ ... never mind ... I've flagged all of them, and I'll put a message on User talk:Colors8 ... you may want to Watchlist them, anyway. &mdash; 151.200.237.53 (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Follow-up on Deletion of LinkConnector
The Entry for LinkConnector was deleted around the 10th of June. I would like to further discuss this deletion, if I may. I feel it is relevant and important to point out that many of LinkConnector's major competitors (found in the same industry, and with the same Wikipedia Categories) have Wikipedia entries that are not at all dissimilar to the entry proposed for LinkConnector. Please see the Shareasale entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareasale) or the Commission Junction entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_Junction) for examples of this.

Here are a few statements to exemplify this point: ''ShareASale is an affiliate marketing network based in Chicago, IL USA. ShareASale services two customer sets in affiliate marketing: the affiliate, and the merchant.... ShareASale was founded in 2000 by Brian Littleton, and to date has over 2,000 merchant programs[1] hosted on its network platform. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareasale)

''LinkConnector is an Affiliate Marketing (form of online advertising) Network headquartered in Cary, North Carolina[1]. As an Affiliate Marketing Network, LinkConnector manages the relationship between a merchant with a product or service to sell and a website owner (affiliate) with space to promote that product or service. LinkConnector currently operates in six departments: Affiliate Relations; Merchant Relations; Technology; HR, Admin, Finance; Sales; Marketing... LinkConnector has over 10,000 affiliates in its network, and hundreds of active merchants...

The statements made in the LinkConnector article proposal were not dissimilar in style or tone from those found in other major companies in the same industry. I also want to be point out that the Article is proposed with the knowledge of Wikipedia's various Guidelines (including Citation Usage, Notability guidelines, etc). This is my first contribution to Wikipedia, so I do ask for your patience - I am willing to work with you, the Editor, to provide an acceptable article for submission.

If possible, I would like to kindly ask that we take the following steps:

1) Would you please email me a copy of the LinkConnector article that has been deleted? The notes from our deletion process stated that an author could ask for a copy of their article.

2) With any further feedback you could give me, I will re-construct the article to correct any shortcomings you see. I will ensure all statements are impartial or neutral.  I will then re-submit our article.

3) I cannot locate the log files from the LinkConnector Talk page. I placed a {hangon} tag onto the LinkConnector article, and then went to the article's Talk page to learn more about why it was deleted and to give feedback.  I cannot find these notes, but would like to keep a copy - would you be able to send this as well?

Thank you in advance for your time! June 23, 2008, JLBContributions JLBContributions (talk) 14:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. I am sorry but I did not delete the article. I see from that it was  that deleted the article. I do not have the power to even see what the old contents were. I suggest you ask Anthony Appleyard if he can help you.

I will, however review the other articles you mentioned and see if they are acceptable, however each artilce must stand on it's own merits see WP:WAX --Triwbe (talk) 16:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Cary Herrman
Thank you Triwbe. I feel there is great notability to the individual, he is apparently a leader in his field, has received awards, has made notable contributions and appears to be a model American. I will take this to other administrators and to wikipedia. Thank you for your comment. BHOrchid (talk) 20:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * notability is only half the task you then have to prove it. I only flagged the article, I neither proposed nor deleted it. I see it was deleted previously. I think you hade better read Articles for deletion/Cary Herrman and WP:BIO because I will know better next time I see the article. --Triwbe (talk) 21:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Cary_Herrman
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cary_Herrman. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. BHOrchid (talk) 22:44, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Gotcha!
You only flagged the article, there was another admin that deleted it. My apologies on the confusion. =) BHOrchid (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

A H school
You have deleted the notables ( Alumni) who have articles on Wikipedia. Also you have deleted the school history such as who were the former teachers (They were not highlighted as notables. They were part of the histrory). Please stop doing so without mentioning on the talk page.

JRN08 (talk) 21:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

It said only about 1. Lists of current teachers, pupils, administrative staff, school secretaries, etc not be listed. It did not say about the former teachers and students. It has recommended to list the former head masters and the notables (Notables to Wikipedia). We will work together keeping this in mind. Thanks for pointing this to us. We were not aware of this.

JRN08 (talk) 21:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Concerning Anandashram High School, Bankikodla I mentioned my guidelines on the talk page. I have no problem discussing their interpretation. Notability of people WP:BIO on the other hand is clearly defined. I will see later. --Triwbe (talk) 21:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for alerting me to these "notable" alumni. I will review those as well. --Triwbe (talk) 21:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Followed the WP:WPSCHOOLS#WNTI. Makesure everyone follows this - not just this school articles, everything and every articles on Wikipedia. Thanks.

JRN08 (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree with you 100%. --Triwbe (talk) 05:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Nadkarni M. V.
Updated as suggested. Feel free to edit - Why should other contributors stop us editing to meet the Wiki standards?

JRN08 (talk) 14:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: My warning over future conduct
I would like to apologise for any disruption caused by the article i submitted regarding Thom Buckley. I would also like to highlight that the page was not targetting anyone for the purpose of bullying etc. as I myself am Thom Buckley and wrote the article merely as a personal in joke between a couple of friends. I'm not challenging your decision just explaining the circumstances in which the article was written. Thankyou —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wtwtwtwtwtwt78 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)