User talk:Triwbe/Archive6

Wolf Frameworks
Hi.. I have added a couple of references already.. and restructured sentences that were sounding like advertisements. Anything else I can do to improve the article? YoungManBlues (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Probably OK, but then check the notabillity issue. I see another editor has already proposed deletion. See Notability (organizations and companies) --triwbe (talk) 12:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi.. I have restructured the article and added references from relaible sources.. anything more I can do to get the advertisement tag removed? YoungManBlues (talk) 13:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: cities of China
ROC is not recognized as a nation by the UN, considering their representative was kicked out and the PRC representative seated as 'China'. With that in mind, it seems misleading to users to treat ROC as a legitimate nation. Just my 2 cents...^_^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.133.106 (talk) 23:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Then explain your edits in either the edit summary or the talk page. Anonymous, unexplained POV changes will be reverted. --triwbe (talk) 23:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

will do. never knew about that...thanks for the advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.133.106 (talk) 23:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Unruled Paper
Thanks, I appreciate it. I'm trying to do all that I can to make sure it doesn't get personal, the previous discussion got way out of hand. You can see that I'm working on a version at User:Khoikhoi/Unruled Paper and User talk:Khoikhoi/Unruled Paper (I've already made a minor change here). Now I'm told that this magazine contains information similar to the Wikipedia article, and if we can just attribute the source properly and in a neutral manner than I think we can start to resolve this. Khoikhoi 20:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I do not understand line 1 of the language :-( but I have a lot of sympathy for editors trying to get sources from non-english based articles. So I try to accept such sources in GF and hope that another editor who does speak/read the language will review at some point. --triwbe (talk) 20:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, the entire article is in Farsi. :-) But what I'm trying to do is provide the most similar sentences from this article to replace the disputed ones here. And if anyone has any questions I can get people to translate them. The problem in this case is that virtually no English sources on this movie exist, and definitely no English reviews. In this case (since the movie is indeed notable in Iran) we are allowed to use non-English sources. I'll get around to asking someone about the article either today or tomorrow. Khoikhoi 20:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * That sounds reasonable. Happy editing. --triwbe (talk) 14:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:EU
Welcome to the project. To be honest I thought you were already a member as I'd seen you around so much. Glad to have you on board.- J.Logan`t : 22:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * So did I :-) --triwbe (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelle_pelle
Hello Triwbe,

I have seen the tags you placed on the pelle pelle page and i changed the text, could you check to see if the text is ok now? If it is, please remove the tags, if it's not let me know what needs to be changed.

Thank you Salense (talk) 09:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure, I will look at it shortly. --triwbe (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

An Apology
Hi. I wanted to offer my sincere and personal apology for what came across as an assumption of bad-faith on your part. It was not meant to be such but could clearly be taken in that fashion. I do disagree with the way you handled those NPP pages and would have preferred to see a personal and friendly approach taken as I suggested but that noticeboard was not the place to point that out to you nor was my tone appropriate. I apologize. --Justallofthem (talk) 17:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Water off of a ducks back mon ami. I had thought nothing more off it. I have not been on NPP for some time due to personal, professional and other WP matters. And if you check my archives, I do try to take on board all constructive criticisms, and maybe, just maybe, one does get a bit carried away from time to time when one is on a heavy patrol with lots of unpatrolled article showing up and few editors patrolling. Happy editing. --triwbe (talk) 18:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool. Thanks. --Justallofthem (talk) 18:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Definition of WP:Vandalism
Hi. You should probably review WP:Vandalism as this edit does not appear to be vandalism. Accusing good faith editors of vandalism is far from constructive. Toddst1 (talk) 14:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I think you should review WP:BLP very quickly. "We must get the article right.[1] Be very firm about the use of high quality references. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space." The addition was unsourced and followed a previous vandalism here and here. --triwbe (talk) 14:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * You should have reverted my edits with a summary of rv wp:or or something similer. And your hardline baseless warnings were in error as well. Bwfc (talk) 14:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I call it as I see it and this edit and this one I see as vandalism. --triwbe (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * So thats a general note and a caution you should have placed on my talk page not a warning and a final warning! Bwfc (talk) 14:42, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * See Vandalism - I can go straight to 3 or even given an only warning. I chose level 3 as you clearly know what you are doing but I was giving you a chance to stop there. --triwbe (talk) 14:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is a funny place with lots of non-admins giving warnings and threats, its like you pretend to be police or something... anyway, since a real admin has said the edit can't stand, i'll leave it alone now! goodbye Bwfc (talk) 14:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Finham Park School
Sorry about that, I guess I wasn't paying attention to if it was vandalism or a new page. Thanks for catching that. --TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 20:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello
If you are a admin can you please watch this page Akkineni Nagarjuna because alot of stuff is missing, I am so confused. Thank you. Xxxsacheinxxx (talk) 18:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * No I am not an admin, but I can watch it. --triwbe (talk) 18:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Kazi Uzair page
I am trying to get as many references as possible to eliminate any doubts on the info posted. However, I would appreciate your pointing out what you might consider to be debatable or disputed in the text posted to date. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abrahamlast (talk • contribs) 15:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi thanks for communicating. I have replied on the talk page of Kazi Uzair so that other editors may be made aware of the discussion. --triwbe (talk) 18:37, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Another Cinderella Story
I may have swung the axe a bit hard, but I don't think that anyone would describe the plot as "overlong" anymore. That was really and truly a mess. Kww (talk) 13:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I like it :-) --triwbe (talk) 16:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Removed Notability Tag From Nat'l Outdoor Leadership School
I placed a note on the article's talk page explaining this action. Calamitybrook (talk) 15:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Orienteering
Hi. In the past you have contributed to Orienteering. The article is getting a makeover now; if you would like to help, please see Talk:Orienteering. Thanks. --Una Smith (talk) 20:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Nitin Kumar Reddy
Hello again, ...

 still seems Kinda Weak in the WP:N department ... I mean, they don't even have an IMDb entry, which has already been deemed insufficient in and of itself to justify an article about the subject!

I've put some lipstick on this pig, but wondered if Some Other Editor would second a PROD on this puppy, or would you contest it? ... Oops! Looks like it needed an Oldprodfull on the Discussion page, because you already slapped a PROD on it on 2008-07-27. :-)

So, I guess the question is, "Do you feel like taking it to WP:AfD, or should we just MOVE ON? Personally, I don't think that they satisfy WP:ENTERTAINER.

Happy Editing! &mdash;  21:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I gave up on this one after the deleted PROD An AfD may provoke some more refs being supplied and also the nominator being criticised for not adding them. --triwbe (talk) 05:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Category:Flagged articles
Hello again, ... FYI, I am going through Category:Flagged articles and reviewing ones that have been tagged for longer than 30 days ... see this stencil for a message that I am leaving on Talk pages when I remove the category.

Happy Editing! &mdash;  18:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rahmat Samii
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rahmat Samii, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Rahmat Samii. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? &mdash; 72.75.68.177 (talk) 20:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Added "no citations" notice
Hi Triwbe

I saw that you added a notice to the "Semantic advertising" Wikipedia article, to which I contributed. The notice states that no citations are in the article. However, the article contains both references and external links. What did I miss? Thanks. Canjimifan (talk) 13:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, twas not me my friend. I have never edited this article!? --triwbe (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Help Me?
Hi, I'm wondering if you can sort of watch my back a little: I just restored some deletions on the page for Dick Cheney's son-in-law, made with no reason offered by an unregistered. Hopefully this will not get nasty, but I would feel better if someone can watch the page with me for a while. Thanks...Phoebe13 (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Chimurenga Library: Tsotso magazine
Hi Triwbe,

We are trying to improve the Chimurenga Library article on these pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tstotso

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-Mag

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savacou

Have our editing, references or sources created better wiki-articles? Thanks for your help.

--Ira Nal27 (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Velocity Mobile
Apparently the entry abut Velocity Mobile I made was deleted because it was considered advertising/spamming. I added it because I thought most manufacturers of mobile phones have an entry. I have nothing to do with them other than that I once considered buying one of their phones. Could you please tell me what I did wrong so i won't get accused of spamming in the future? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pizzaman79 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!


 Marlith  (Talk)   has given you a kitten! Gifts of kittens promote Wikilove and holiday spirt. Hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and raise the holiday spirit! Send kittens to others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.  Marlith  (Talk)   02:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Banning?
Why am I being threatened with being banned for vandalism? I just edited a spelling error - correcting Ice cold beer's spelling of 'epsiode' with 'episode'. I thought the general public were allowed to contribute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.151.33 (talk) 12:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you talking of a ban from 10 months ago? For this | edit or perhaps this | one ? --triwbe (talk) 16:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

S. Nadkarni
facts are verified. That is enough.

JRN08 (talk) 14:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * On Arvind S. Nadkarni, Where are they verified? All facts must be verifiable by anyone who wishes to. There are zero references given and as such the article is incomplete. --triwbe (talk) 17:04, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for that vandalism reversion. Jayjg (talk) 21:00, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

This is a stub and has been verified.

Thinkloose (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

User:24.150.133.106
Have you given a free pass to continue to commit vandalism? Little Red Riding Hood  talk  23:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Good grief! are you serious? see User talk:Triwbe. --triwbe (talk) 23:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * He tried to claim that you told him his edits were good. He's been blocked, anyway.   Little Red Riding Hood  talk  00:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I think the fact that I gave him a level 2 and a level 3 warning should be clear enough of what I thought of his edits. --triwbe (talk) 00:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirect of Markicevic Vladimir
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Markicevic Vladimir, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Markicevic Vladimir is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Markicevic Vladimir, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

references/citations
This is a great website and I understand your need for totally reliable informations. But it's not always easy to retrieve the references and proofs (often lost in a bundle of archives). So please leave us a little time! Many thanksFilmbuffcalifornia (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If it's one one of the pages tagged as needing refs, I always leave months. If it is a page I have redirected or WP:PROD!ed then months will have passed but you can undo the action when refs are avialable. For the instance of Tony Maylam, I think there must be some references out there somewhere, so I will not be touching that one. --triwbe (talk) 17:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree...
...but there wasn't anything there beyond a single sentence not much longer than what I'm writing now. I can put it back and we'll see what develops. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Message
Hello Triwbe, left a message for you on the Fitzpatrick discussion page as follows (save you going there): ''Oh, sorry, completely forgot the tildes. Yes, good idea, will add an under construction notice. In any event have now added loads more links and sources, and am in process of converting several pdf's (reliable sources) although this might take me a day or two, so please be patient :-)'' AndreaUKA (talk) 13:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello Triwbe, have answered you on my talkpage - AndreaUKA (talk) 18:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

...and yet another reply...AndreaUKA (talk) 21:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Triwbe, your help is hugely appreciated on this. Oh, am away Fri - Mon, please don't delete anything meanwhile, am in process of sorting out lots more :-) AndreaUKA (talk) 22:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I will not delete anything. But you have every right to undo my (or any one elses) edits at any time if you do not agree. C U later. --triwbe (talk) 22:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

I know, and I occasionally do, but only if I truly believe I am correct. I was jesting re deletion, the article stands up now, I think, but thanks again anyway :-) AndreaUKA (talk) 22:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Roxy Bernstein
Hello Triwbe. I've attempted to improve the Roxy Bernstein article issues. I'm new to this, so I'd appreciate any constructive feedback on the article's discussion page. Also, if I've addressed your concerns, would you be kind enough to remove the tags on the article? Thanks EddieAlbania (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * OK I cleanup the refs a bit and added categoreis and projects. --triwbe (talk) 08:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

re User:Kettsu
Respect for this edit to the above's talkpage, especially the last sentence. It was, however, wasted on the individual concerned. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Tiger avon is not a stub, though
It may be many things, but it is not a stub. Advertorial, incomplete, orphan, uncat, yes, but please tell me why you think it is a stub? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * IMO anything that does not attain FA FL A GA B C D or start class is a stub. Do you think it rates start ? --Triwbe (talk) 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I think it rates deletion! Equally what else could go in there?  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh I agree, it's practically on the point of a speedy deletion (it was I who flagged the company for speedy), but there's no harm alerting others who may be able to save it. Mind you, I looked for better refs and well ....... --Triwbe (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Me too. There's a load of gossipy stuff.  It's a pretty decent suicide nut kind of car, loads of scope to have great fun in it, but notable?  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * That leads on to many of the cars in Kit car. Many of those are in the same category. In a way I like some of them (as articles) especially the cars/companies that no longer exist. I think it makes wikipedia better with no risk of being commercial in nature. But, as the article says, in the UK practically anyone can set themselves up as a kit car company, so where does one draw the line ? --Triwbe (talk) 15:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Puja Thomson
I've removed the PROD notice on this article, because a previous proposal to delete was contested. You will need to nominate the article through the full WP:AFD process.CJPargeter (talk) 10:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Questioning prod of Sinan Alaağaç
Added reference to the death, which appears to be the reason for the prod. The article needs work, and honestly, if were to go to AfD, I'd go weak keep. From what little there is out there, dude seemed to have a decent degree of notability in Turkey (but since all this happened before the web really blew up, there will be fewer refs anyway), but I think at some point there may be an article there. OK, enough rambling. I'm tired right now, so I won't make a decision tonight to contest the prod. If you feel very strongly about it, though, let me know.

Vulture19 (talk) 04:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 * That's great. I proded because saying people are dead, with out references, is a huge risk ( see Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-01-24/Flagged_Revisions. I removed the prod. --Triwbe (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad to know the whole process can still be civil. I may watch the page and possibly do some work....Vulture19 (talk) 14:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Ash4sfc
Hi – I've just nominated Alex bastin for speedy deletion. I noticed you gave the author a final warning before they did this – presumably the previous page was an attack. The current page is tagged for notability – there seems to be no defamatory content – but I though I'd give you a heads-up as you issued the warning. Cheers. Cycle~ (talk) 12:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Mizuphone
Hiya Triwbe. You and User:Calltech apparently disagree about this article, judging from the edit summaries. I've told Calltech that it wouldn't bother me at all if someone wants to take this to AfD. I speedied the related article which involved a product they were selling. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 21:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

COI Questions
Triwbe - I have questions relating to a discussion on Dick Clark Architecture On the COI it states that the article may need a clean-up. Can you tell me what is on there that violates neutrality? or how it can be fixed? I feel stuck - I feel like the article is neutral and adds content - I want to play by the rules and have received messages from other administrators, to continue excited by the post - including the one who started this article. I would also like to write additional articles of similar content. But I feel that you want me to stop. I don't want to get articles I write or contribute to blacklisted as the article you posted suggested, because I feel that the articles do contribute, especially when I read other articles with similar subjects. It actually seems to be an area that could be furthered in wikipedia for data sharing and research on contemporary architecture. This is a difficult thing to research when you are in school as there is only one real database called the Avery Index of Architectural Journals. But most of these journals are not web based and schools of architecture only have limited selection. I am an adjunct faculty member teaching graduate studio in architecture and know that the students value the research capabilities of wikipedia. When I read the wikipedia policies i get conflicting information and am truly unsure how to proceed - sometimes it says that everyone should be allowed to contribute as long as it stays neutral and furthers wikipedia's content, but that if you know about the subject intimately it may be a conflict of interest to write. Please tell me what you would have me do to rectify the situation. Additionally does being a professor in a field cause a conflict of interest in writing about that field? If you could direct me to other wikipedia policies that I can read that would be helpful as well. thank you for your help. 9 ACRE (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the guidance.I am very very new on Wikipedia you helped me very much, really thanks.Abbatai (talk) 12:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

admiralxiphos about Made of Hate
Why did you delete the Made of Hate page I made? Made of Hate is a Polish melodic death metal band and it is important for all the fans out there to have a wikipedia reference page about their band. I beleive I even posted tunings on the page as a reference for guitar players who want to attempt at learning their songs. Why did you do that? Are you prejudice against death metal or something? Or did I not do something right when making the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.165.244.176 (talk) 04:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I did not, in-fact, cannot, delete anything. Made of Hate appears to have been deleted by User:Stwalkerster

22:58, 6 September 2008 Stwalkerster (Talk | contribs) deleted "Made of Hate" (Article about an a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not assert notability (CSD A7))


 * But it looks as though the band was simply not notable enough (See WP:BAND). Also Wikipeida is not a how to book to show people how to play, try doing that on myspace. See Your first article and make sure you get sources to show the notability of the band. --Triwbe (talk) 06:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Tourist Sites in Egypt - deletion
Response: Please feel free to delete this article. My goal was to create an umbrella page for all the tourist sites in Egypt - was not aware that this went against wikipedia policy. Mlavannis (talk) 22:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Random approval :)
I just wanted to say that I've noted your vigilance especially in connection to Indian pop culture articles, and it's appreciated. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, your appreciation is equally appreciated. It's a pity these editors do not seem to realise that CV degrades their articles and does an injustice to those who have made the effort to rewrite their texts. --Triwbe (talk) 16:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Idaho Meth Project
I am an intern at the Idaho Meth Project and they wanted me to start a Wikipedia page, and they told me I could literally use all the content from their website for the Wikipedia page. I am new to Wikipedia and I was wondering how I can use their content since I got their permission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sben87 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * If you hold the copyright to this text and permit its use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License:


 * Explain this on this article's discussion page, then either display a notice to this effect at the site of original publication or send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal letter to the Wikimedia Foundation. These messages must explicitly permit use under the GFDL.


 * Note: Articles on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view and must be verifiable in published third-party sources; copyright issues aside, your text may not be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. --Triwbe (talk) 21:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan Glatzer
Hi, just a note to let you know I removed you A7 speedy from Jonathan Glatzer, as the page clearly does not meet A7. If you still think the page should be deleted, please use AfD. Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 08:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Making 1 film, which has only just been released yet is no criteria for any kind of inclusion. --Triwbe (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 25 May 2009 ==


 * License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
 * News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
I was about to add a Create4im myself, but it seems you saved me the effort. Thanks you, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 13:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC) :)


 * It needed doing. It seems to be a vandalism only account. --Triwbe (talk) 14:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

MineWolf
I see you've contributed to the following article I've proposed for deletion, you may want to take a look. In fact, I see from your talk page it might have previously been proposed which might change things. I'm unfamiliar with the intracity of WP workings so you might want to intervene if I've acted in error.


 * Let the PROD run and see what happens. --Triwbe (talk) 18:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MineWolf
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article MineWolf, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 91.85.138.20 (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Takkle
An article that you have been involved in editing, Takkle, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)