User talk:Triwbe/Archive7

hi triwbe
I don't know how I can verify for you some of the information. Some of it I can verify.

For example if you wanted to be able to prove that Tim is a writer for iRun I could dd llinks to some of his articles. Would this help.

http://irun.ca/issues/article.php?id=151&intIssueID=9

or

http://irun.ca/issues/article.php?id=75&intIssueID=6

Alot of the informatin I have gotten from his wife and family. I'm sorry if this does not conform to your rules and I don't want to waste your time but I would really like to find a way to get him his page.

Thanks.

Grant Boland (talk) 21:18, 31 ay 20009 (UTC) Grant

Your 'Friendly' tags
Are you serious? I mean, how can something that may have been said by some guy in a summercamp ever meet the otability guidelines? 'Yinta ɳ  12:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes well at this time the speedy has been there over 3 hours, so it does not seem to be that obvious (but I do agree with you :-). --Triwbe (talk]) 15:58, 2 Jun 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't get me wrong, I'm not being bitey or sarcastic, I was just vey surrprised. See you, Yintta ɳ '  21:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

2 Grand
Thanks for your comments on this matter, with which I agree. To avoid confusion, you may wish to close the AFD, per WP:SPEEDYKEEP. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC


 * I was thinking of closing the AfD (non-admin close) but cheekily thougt tthat it may also be a good way of attracting peoples attention to the case. --Triwbe (alk))14:21,, 2 June 2009 (UC)

==

I have added references under Science and Medicine in article "Yadav"
Hi Triwbe, You removed my conbutiotion becaushere we were no references. I have now added references under "Science and Medicine" in article "Yadav" and restored my contribution. If you t mormore references, I can provide more. Rao Ravindra (talkk 09 23, 3 Ju June 2009 (UTC)india Rao 20 2009.06.03

I saw, and I left it. But th se se are not proof of notability. --Triwbe (talk):24, 3,June 2e 2009 (UTC)

Websitsite Leasing]]
Hi Triwbe, I started a discussion on this page. Thank--Loopy09 (talk) 09:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Copyright law and fair dealing
Dear Triwbe

I am a little surprised about your removal of ast I mI made this morning for copyright reasons. My knowledge of copyright law is actually pretty good, and a single line quotation from a long newspaper article (especially when that quotation is credited) is not a breach of any form of copyright under any law that I am aware of - in the UK it would come under the terms of "fair dealing".

However I have now rephrased the line so it is not a direct quotation.

Johnlbirch (talk)


 * Ths, I was nst sure mysmyself, but felt better to to be safe than sorry, that is why is mentioned AGF. Wikipeida falls under United States laws and the phrase would bfair use"se" but I could not find the definitions for textual quotes from copyright sources. FAQ/Copyright has the normal guidelines. --Triwbewbe (talk) 11:41, 8 June 2 (UTC)T

== D

= Diana Vicke Thank

?

(sumeet_92) —Precrk yet.[Wikipedia:Signatures that td]] comment added 17:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC).


 * It's enivitable that it will be restored, it'sed">—Precuding Triwbe (talk) 18:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Not convinced that a deletion review was the best course, but hopefully it will help establish the issue. I admit it's more than likely she'll end up notable pretty soon (the Daily Mail often Not coevincedod articles on r revie contestants, if you can bring yourself to read it) but, until then, I don't think having an article full of conjecture, intricate detail about the show and references to blogs is a good idea. J Milburn (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * DR got people's attention and people were questioning the deletion decision under the new information criteria. There was chronic edit warring going on with 0 discussion. I wanted more input.


 * DR re peoplekeeping out WP:Feople w content etc. But I think we should give people the foundations to build on and then prune and model as it goes (the right wikiway). At the moment I think a great number of the UK public would expect to see an article and questions why Wikipedia has so forcefully blocked it. Bad PR again for WP :-( --Triwbe (talk) 06:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

'''Diana Vickeee an ajust been given the lead role in the West End play 'The Rise And Fall Of Little Voice' and I think it is friwbe]] (y that this makes her notable enough for this page to be restoreana Vi

kers hes:

CE_2009070en the

p://uk.tv.yahoo.com/09072009/19/diana-vickers-wins- Littled-role.html

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/a164394/diana-vickers-lands-role-in-west-end-musical.html

http://entertainment.uk.msn.com/tv/news/Article.aspx?cp-documentid=148461486

http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/x-factor/diana-vickers-lands-west-end-role-the-rise-and-fall-of-little-voice/

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090709/ten-diana-vickers-wins-west-end-role-5a7c575_1.html

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/4484963.East_Lancashire_star_Diana_Vickers_lands_West_End_role/

http://programmes.stv.tv/news-gossip/107919-diana-vickers-lands-lead-role-in-west-end-musical/

http://channelhopping.onthebox.com/2009/07/09/diana-vickers-to-make-west-end-debut/

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/x_factor/2524787/X-Factor-star-Diana-Vickers-to-star-in-Little-Voice.html

http://entertainment.aol.co.uk/tv/diana-vickers-little-voice/article/20090709073846282462897

http://www.myparkmag.co.uk/articles/television/x-factor/diana-vickers-little-voice-.html

http://www.malextra.com/tv/Diana+Vicker-55017.html

http://www.bollyfirst.com/tv/Diana+Vicker-55017.html

http://www.londontheatre.co.uk/londontheatre/news/jl09/riseandfalloflittlevoice333139.htm

http://www.whatsonstage.com/index.php?pg=207&story=E8831247163001&title=X+Factor%92s+Vickers+Stars+in+Little+Voice+Revival&ref=D

http://www.hellomagazine.com/celebrities-news-in-pics/09-07-2009/51915/

http://news.uk.msn.com/entertainment/article.aspx?cp-documentid=148461293&imageindex=6 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumeet 92 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 

--Sumeet 92 (talk) 22:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

SunTec article
Hi, please see the talk page of SunTec before attempting to delete the content agntributiok you. -- [[User:Sreejith Kumar|Sreejith Kumar]C)</spser /smallreejith Kumar|talk]gned -59, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

In appreciUser:S
t 92|Sume="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; verser:Sralign: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''"Speedy" Awarth Kum C)
 * rowspan="2" valign="middle" | IAR doesn't mean page pg
 * rowspan="2ng to
 * }

John Smithson
Why did you revert my edit to the artic"border:n1px shlid graye back producer, not adffe7;" rowspour revert has prevented me from correcting that error. Rterrace (" User talk:Rterrace|talk]]) 22:07addingune 2verticaC)


 * gn: bodded a non-existant template. Your articl'''ays |s'yle="actor al-alig. --Triwbe (talk) 22:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You blindly reverted my corrections. When doing your revert you also removk| other new content that I added, such as the awards section. Thank you for adding the categories, but in the future please avoid making blind reverts. Rterrace (talk) 23:33, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

why?
Hi Triwbe,

I am just wondering why you keep redirecting some pages that I create or edit.

Especially the school ones that or as weel. --[[Uing.

You have be]] ([[Uing them as Vandalism or not notable school and redirecting them to Education in Victoria.

Can you please explain why this is happening.

Thanks,

To help and assist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by To help and assist (talk • contribs) 06:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for communicating.


 * I explained on your talk page yesterday to make you aware. Again Primary schools are not normally notable enough to have an article and so get redirected to the local education authority. Notability (schools) explains it clearly I think. --Triwbe (talk) 07:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Triwbe,

I was unaware of this. I have deleted all contents and redirected the page to What you originally did.

I am new to Wikipedia and am not fully aware of the procedures. Please let me know if there is any other things that I have edited or modified that are incorrect. As i said any mistakes I have made are unintentional.I will take this opportunity to read up on creating and modifying articles.

Thank you for your assistance Triwbe, I value and appreciate very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by To help and assist (talk • contribs) 07:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
- Dank (push to talk) 15:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Bombshelter Beats
I don't understand why this article has to be speedily deleted. This is a real rap group with real members and just because the page is small, it seems, it automatically needs to be speedily deleted. I realize it isn't as large or as informative as many other music pages, but that is because most of the others have been established for a long time and have a lot of information to put on their pages. Bombshelter Beats, on the other hand, was established less than two weeks ago, which is why the page is not very large as of now.

Thank you, Americadominates (talk) 06:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Not every single band, person or company automatically has a page on Wikipedia. To be included it has to be notable, in this case the criteria are shown by notability guideline for musical topics, as I mentioned on your talk page. I hope that explains it for you. --Triwbe (talk) 07:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Asef Al Izaag
Could you please tell me why you proposed this article to be deleted? it is listed in a wikipedia article as one of the notable Egyptian cinema films: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_of_Egypt and under the filmography for ahmed helmy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Helmy

How can I improve the article and keep it?

Travelerman09 (talk) 07:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)travelerman09


 * As the proposal explains, see Notability (films) and then show how the film is notable and supply references to reliable sources proving it. A link to a list of films on Wikipedia is not proof. That lists needs a lot of clean up as well. Note Internet Movies Database is not considered a reliable source either --Triwbe (talk) 09:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Request for removal of speedy deletion notice
Please remove the speedy deletion notice from User:Altafqadir/Double Top & Double Bottom. After completing the article I shall move it back to Double Top & Double Bottom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Altafqadir (talk • contribs) 18:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Notice of vandalism?
Hello Triwbe,

I only just recieved a notice which was purportedly submitted back in April of this year on the talk page for my IP. Despite using this site frequently, I only just saw the notice of a new message today. Since I didn't have an account I made one as per the site's suggestion. I don't suppose you have a memory of what it was that was edited on the London Stock Exchange site by my IP on the 18th of April 2009? I have never edited anything before, so I'm unsure on how to proceed. Apparently I was also issued a final warning for vandalism of the New York Stock Exchange site (also apparently from my IP). I'm not exactly sure what's happening here. Could you please explain this to me?

Thank you, Zzinged —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzinged (talk • contribs) 12:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You would have to let me know the IP you were using, but you look yourself by going to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/...... and replace the last dots with the ip address.


 * Actually, looking at the edit history here I do not see any vandalism. --Triwbe (talk) 12:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, here is the talk page for my IP address. I'm stumped as to who might have made the changes from m IP address because the only other people who use this IP address are my parents, and they have no reason or interest to change minor details regarding international stock exchanges =\ Zzinged (talk) 23:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Well looking back at the logs I can see that the likely edit was this one, nothing to do with the NYSE. Hope that helps.--Triwbe (talk) 05:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * HAHA no, that doesn't help, but it's pretty amusing. Oh well, not much I can do about it really. I have no idea who made that edit since my IP seems to be dynamic (I previously thought it was static). Thanks for the help Triwbe :) /Zzinged (talk) 06:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem...
There wasn't a lot of content and I thought it might have either been garden variety band vanity or a hoax. Thanks for letting me know. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

MPHO
Fantastic. Good to see you've recreated the page and I hope this one lasts! Jckcip (talk) 23:36, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Grasshopper Mowers
Wondering why the page I created is being flagged as an advertisement and my personal photos being tagged as corporate on Grasshopper Mowers. Please help. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Melovely007 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * These photos appear on the corporate website, advertising their products, which claims copyright ownership of the photos. Wikipedia canot accept copyright content. See FAQ/Copyright. So if you own these images, and you gave them to the website, this means that you work for the company in some capacity and so your web pages is probably promotional. Conflict of interest. --Triwbe (talk) 06:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Assistance needed
I saw your post on Lord Botetourt High School's Talk page and I would like to know what I can do to fix the article. I just need some guidance on this process since there are many problems. Thank you, --II Ross II (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GetAbstract International Book Award


The article GetAbstract International Book Award has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * See Talk:GetAbstract International Book Award for discussion

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Marc Kupper&#124;talk 06:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Nautronix
Apologies, trying to add information on my company, and remove re-directs from L3 who bought a division of it in 2006.

Just seen the messages sent to me regarding its content/format. Will review your guidelines with management and address the issue.

IainNIX (talk) 10:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

National Wiffleball League
Hi. Just noticed that you converted the speedy deletion tag on this article from A7 to G4. Are you sure it's been deleted through AfD? The links in the notice at the top of the article don't seem to indicate it, and in that case G4 doesn't apply. No big deal, as long as the article gets removed and preferably salted. Cheers, Favonian (talk) 09:59, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, the nomination and delete decision are at Articles for deletion/Adam Vanderloop. --Triwbe (talk) 10:07, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. Favonian (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Dive Bomber (film)
I noted in the discussion on the film that you were interested in bringing the article up to a B-standard. I have done some preliminary research and rewriting and would appreciate you taking a look. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC).

Citation
I saw you place a tag for citation on the Lee Jun Ki page. What did you need cited? 69dressings (talk) 22:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I will answer on the Lee Jun Ki talk page. --Triwbe (talk) 05:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

no problem
yup i will keep that in mind JackFrozen (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

copyvio
you recently deleted my contribution to the waybuloo page by stating copy vio, whilst the bbc website was cited as a reference to authenticate the information because it contained similar wording, the actual wording came from a bbc press release put into public domain by the bbc press dept and so is not subject to copyright. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TamsinA (talk • contribs) 23 Sept 09


 * Well, whereas there may have been a few words changed the major content (here) was word for word identical to the website here which reserves full rights here. You may not copy complete sentences and any small changes that you made could still be considered as Derivative work.


 * For more information see Copyright FAQ. --Triwbe (talk) 22:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

conflict of interest?
Hello,

I have edited the content of the Romanian language page for Renate Weber, member of the European Parliament (the page was created by someone else and it was outdated). I have also created an English version of the page. I am working as Press Officer for Mrs. Renate Weber and, before writing the page, I have looked over the criteria for biographies of living persons, notability etc. and I have tried to write the article as informative and neutral as my BBC journalistic background has taught me to. Someone pointed out to me that I might be in a conflict of interest, although I have quoted other sources and have tried to not make an advertisment-like article. I also never had the intention of keeping my function private - I have signed the article with my own name and not a pseudonim etc. Please let me know what should I do, in order to avoid deletion of the articles, since I do not believe they should be erased. Thank you very much. Mirela Rus (talk) 11:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Mirela


 * There is no risk of the article being deleted, the subject passes all necessary criteria for inclusion. You shoud read Conflict of interest. A Neutral point of view is a core policiy of Wikipedia and the question people will ask is "can you be expected to be absolutely neutral in your position". This means that every edit you make is questionable. If you really do work for Mme Weber, every edit you make, regardless of sourcing, may do more damage than good. People will see who has worked on this article and say it's just a vanity article.


 * More importantly is the mess the article is in. Please read Referencing for beginners and External links which this article fails badly.--Triwbe (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)


 * P.S. When reporting about the commission, the EP and MEPs, BBC journalists are sometimes far from neutral. --Triwbe (talk) 14:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Converted to PROD: Polestar Virtual Printer
Hello Triwbe, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have changed a page you tagged (Polestar Virtual Printer) from being tagged for speedy deletion to being tagged for proposed deletion. The speedy deletion criteria are very narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! Tim Song (talk) 08:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Wrong IP address
I did not edit Dill Mill Gayye.Cheak the ip address its wrong ID,Cheak before giving a note 121.246.13.115 (talk) 19:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The edit was over a month ago. Some one else was using that IP address. That is why the message I put says "If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." --Triwbe (talk) 20:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

regarding Foundation for the Preservation of the American Family (FPAF)
Thank you for your advice and suggestion on where to go for references.

The page was speedily deleted by Bearian (talk) yesterday, and I also message him about it just to explain the purpose of creating a page for the foundation. We will try rewriting it again with a neutral POV. Thanks again Freehelplist (talk) 17:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * NPOV problems will not get a page deleted, just re-written. Notability based on good 3rd party References are the key. --Triwbe (talk) 21:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Vacuity (band) notability
Hello Triwbe,

I have provided a slew of links to help backup the Vacuity (band) article. You have flagged this article numerous times for notability, but a quick google search reveals that the band has a legitimate presence. Online worldwide distribution via Maplemusic.com and a small, but growing fan base. If there is anything else you think would help legitimize this article, let me know, perhaps I can dig some of it up.

RF.

http://news.therecord.com/article/325220

http://echoweekly.com/viewstory.php?storyid=7177

http://www.411mania.com/music/album_reviews/737/Vacuity-%E2%80%93-The-Middle-Ground-Review.htm

http://www.fazermagazine.com/new/viewPost.php?id=651

a great review of their set at NXNE - definitely notable:

http://www.chartattack.com/reviews/50839/vacuity-horseshoe-tavern

also, a feature (a bit dated) in Canadian Musician Magazine:

http://canadianmusician.com/showcase/index.php/2004/05/08/vacuity-mayjune-2004/

WP:NEWT
Hello again, ... I've been off-line for a couple of weeks, and just saw your post on my old IP page ... I'll take a closer look at it Real Soon Now, but, yeah, it looks like what I had in mind. :-) Happy Editing! &mdash;  04:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Ban Suggestion
Hi,

This person, who has the user name: Puppyph and is also using the IP: 124.106.168.42 is trying vandalize some Wiki pages and is also acting up like a Wikipedia Policy police.

Is there a way you can ban this person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.128.48.224 (talk) 11:26, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Futuroscope Image deletion?
Hi, I noticed you marked all the images on the Futuroscope page for deletion and they have now been deleted (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Futuoscope1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 2 and 3). One for licence issues and 2 as blatent copyright infringment. I uploaded these images a few years ago and without being able to see them now can't say for certain but I thought they were my own photos (and therefore not copyright infringement). Is there any way to see the original images so I can check? Thanks Turquoisefish (talk) 22:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, it is not a question of who owns the photograph, it is who owns the copyright for the building. In many countries it is not permitted to publish picture of buildings where the copyright is still in effect, as it is in France. See Public_domain. --Triwbe (talk) 08:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, That wasn't obvious to me and maybe it would have been better explaining that on the comments on my user page rather than just calling it blatant copyright infringement which I would take to mean using images that are copyright in themselves such as a Disney picture of Mickey Mouse. Turquoisefish (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

SOSTAC & PR Smith
Hi Twibe PAul Smith here, thanks for yoor comments re SOSTAC. Will have to digest all the links and information before coming back to you. I am still unsure what I have to do to ensure SOSTAC is properly listed, explained and attributed to me as I did create it. I did post a list of books where I have published it plus I have offfered to send in the SOSTAC trade mark registered to me (I listed the registration number).

As mentioned I've been invited by the Chart Ins Marketing to speak about SOSTAC as they know I am the original author.

Any other suggestions welcome. Yours Polmacgabhan (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Paul SmithPolmacgabhan (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Triwbe
First of all, why have you posted a deletion of my Artist AJ Misterio, I am his manager Ray Francis, and I am disgusted by your lack of respect for upcoming musicians

Secondly what are you reasons????? If you have any —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymond Francis (talk • contribs) 11:44, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Wikipiedia is an encyclopedia of notable information, This person has not been shown to be notable. 2) Wikipedia is not a media for you to advertise and promote your clients. --Triwbe (talk) 11:53, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Dear Triwbe
(c) 2010

The material is copyright of Militalia Entertainment Ltd (UK), and therefore under Copyright Law and International Rights and subject to the Freedom of Information Act, no person may abuse the right of this information by delete, edit or tamper with the creation of this material without obtaining a licence from our legal team, to request a consultation please email militalia_entertainment_ltd@hotmail.co.uk with your reasons of complaint

Failure to go through the correct channels will result in forcing Wikipedia's Senior Management to reveal the identity of the plaintiff via legal proceedings in any court where our International Rights may apply and will result in suing all parties involved to the maximum litigation

If you are clever enough you will find some sources are still in the process of being uploaded that makes that page authentic and legitimate, and if you keep up this constant vandalism to slow us down, I WILL PROSECUTE WITH SERIOUS LITIGATION —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymond Francis (talk • contribs) 12:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

My stupidity
I don't know how I managed to do that, many apologies. Dougweller (talk) 13:05, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I should hope so :-) --Triwbe (talk) 13:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I was so keen to repay the help other people have given me yesterday and today.... really, many apologies, I seem to be running mainly on adrenalin but don't want to try to nap as then I won't sleep tonight either. I'll abandon editing right now and go pick up my proper computer, that'll keep me safely off Wikipedia for a couple of hours at least! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 13:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Have a good espresso and don't sweat it. See Ya. --Triwbe (talk) 13:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Out of interest, I doubt the holder of the threatening account is even remotely familiar with the law (maybe he watches Law and Order). The UK Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies only to public sector bodies, and requires them to make available information at the request of a member of the public (eg asking how much the Highway Agency spent on maintaining roads in Manchester). It is nothing to do with freedom of speech, and definitely contains no provision that would require Wikipedia to carry a 'profile' of his chum who plays in a band.Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh I realised that. But as soon as I have a conflict, and I know I have only followed the policies, I just alert wp:ani and let the community deal with it, which they have done spectacularly :-) I think it is better to let others deal with it and be open rather than make the situation worse.


 * It fun to see such newbies who think no-one else is watching and that they can intimidate experienced editors. Then when they ignore the warnings and guidelines and go too far, the wikicommunity acts decisively.


 * What is more worrying is that certain agents might think that Wikipedia is an easy promotional tool. Anyone who tries that and fails will probably do more damage to his client's image than enhance it. I would not stay with an agent who tries such cheap tactics (hypothetically speaking :-) --Triwbe (talk) 15:08, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Flurgederf
Hi Triwbe. I note you've proposed this daftness for deletion. I think it qualifies as a speedy under G3. What do you think? Plutonium27 (talk) 05:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've decided to go ahead and nominate it for CSD. It is a blatant hoax. Hope you're ok with that. All the best, Plutonium27 (talk) 06:14, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes I am OK with that. --Triwbe (talk) 06:17, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

This is pathetic, i am the owner of the pic palak_sitting.jpg and u still deleted it
This is pathetic, i am the owner of the pic palak_sitting.jpg and u still deleted it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oopsalion (talk • contribs) 02:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This photo was found on Facebook and they claim it as copyright. So 1) Either you took it from facebook and you are not the owner or 2) you are the owner and you or someone uploaded it to Facebook who now own it. You should contact Facebook and claim your ownership there and get them to remove the photo before uploading it here where it will be in the public domain.


 * Or there is a 3rd possibility; You do own the photo, you are an agent or work with for that person and you have a Conflict of interest and should not be editing the article any way. We are not stupid, we have seen it all before. --Triwbe (talk) 06:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

"Ingo Mörth" & SVG question mark
Hi, I have added references and citations, but still the svg-mark remains. what further references are missing ??--Leontari1 (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)


 * OK removed. Good work. --Triwbe (talk) 11:19, 19 April 2010 (UTC)