User talk:TrixAreForKidsSillyRabbit/Archives/2018/November

Origin of the Romanians
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iovaniorgovan (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Iovaniorgovan, you're not doing yourself any good by retaliating against other editors with edit war warinings (which you of all people would be the last to accuse others of). You are treading on thin ice. TrixAreForKidsSillyRabbit (talk) 08:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * You should ask Borsoka about that (I'm assuming you two are different people). My issue is you reverted my edit(s) without bringing it up for discussion, as I have done. This is not the civil way to do it, which leads to edit wars. Just the same, something good may come out of this. All the best!Iovaniorgovan (talk) 18:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Iovaniorgovan, if you seriously suspect that Borsoka and I are the same person, then put your money where your mouth is and initiate a sockpuppet investigations against Borsoka and me. As for reverting others' edits without bringing it up for discussion, take a look at your own talkpage and take your own advice. Speaking of civility, if I were you, I would drop the nationalist baiting and battleground mentality, or else your days of editing on Wikipedia may be numbered. TrixAreForKidsSillyRabbit (talk) 19:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I was just joking about you and Borsoka, relax. And enough with the threats, please, I"m not intimidated. Everything I do is per Wiki rules. As I said, all the best!Iovaniorgovan (talk) 05:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I am not joking. Please cease with the trolling and stay off my talkpage. Any further comments from you will be deleted. TrixAreForKidsSillyRabbit (talk) 06:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Feeding the trolls
I think we should avoid his trap. He obviously only wants to provocate lengthy boring debates about anything. If we fell into his trap, we cannot seek assistance from other editors, because nobody wants to spend hours to understand the core of the debate before providing third opinion or commenting the issue. Borsoka (talk) 02:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Origin of the Romanians/Archive 19


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Origin of the Romanians/Archive 19. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Talk:Origin of the Romanians/Archive 19. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Talk:Origin of the Romanians/Archive 19. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:17, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Moving an ongoing NPOV discussion to archive
Thank you for your efforts of keeping the Talk page clean. Nevertheless I suspect it is not quite all right to archive a discussion (lengthy as it is, true) while there is still an ongoing board discussion concerning it. Respectfully I would like to ask you to undo that.

Thank you.Cealicuca (talk) 18:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Edit War
Your recent editing history at Origin of the Romanians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iovaniorgovan (talk) 08:42, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Iovaniorgovan, I've already warned you to stop trolling and stay off my talk page. You've already made 3 reverts to Origin of the Romanians, violating 3RR. Plus your actions are retaliation for the Edit War warning made against you. I suggest you stop this now. TrixAreForKidsSillyRabbit (talk) 09:00, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Robert McClenon (talk) 09:11, 27 November 2018 (UTC)