User talk:Trixi72

Marie de France
10/2 Hi Trixi! I reverted your Marie de France edits as I did not feel they were ready to be out on Wikipedia. I recommend creating a page something like User:Trixi72/marie (or something) where you can fully develop your ideas and write your code without breaking the page. Get everything the way you want it, then cut and paste it into the real article.

Also, just a few suggestions...
 * there are separate articles for The Lais of Marie de France, including each individual lai like Lanval. I would move commentary and analysis there rather than in the Marie de France article.
 * i would go ahead and create separate pages for any other works that you want to discuss, like her Fables, Espurgatoire, or the Saint Audree, as no one has touched these yet. Again, commentary and analysis of the works probably merit their own page.
 * Since the theories about Marie's identity are a little dicey (everyone's got one), I would cite your sources as footnotes, but I wouldn't push one theory over another lest the objectivity of the article be jeopardized.

Anyhoo, great research, and I look forward to seeing your final version!

tamara


 * 10/2 Actually, I was super impressed by all the research that went into this entry. The only reason why I bothered contacting you about the revert was because the expansion had so much potential - not just for Marie de France, but for her other works as well.  I would love to see a page just on her Fables, for example, and your students are almost there already.

Please encourage them to get their hard work posted. If they're trying to edit from a campus computer without logging on, the IP Address may be blocked (thanks to someone's abuse from that machine). Just a thought... or maybe it was a bug, who knows?

Thanks for recruiting new Wikipedians! :o) Very cool assignment!

Romeo and Juliet collaboration
Greetings! The current Shakespeare Project Collaboration is Romeo and Juliet. This project is currently going a thorough peer review and copyedit before moving on to FAC. The link to the peer review is Peer review/Romeo and Juliet/archive1. Have a look! « Diligent Terrier   Bot    (talk)   20:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Shakespeare notice
There is currently a discussion going on regarding the project's policy on how information on characters should be represented in articles on Shakespeare's plays. Please take part by clicking Talk:Romeo and Juliet. Further context, if needed, can be found by scanning the two previous talk sections on the page as well. Sent by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 04:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) per request of Wrad (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. When you recently edited Antony and Cleopatra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dido (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. When you recently edited Antony and Cleopatra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Titan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm Richard Yin. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sonnet 146 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Richard Yin (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sonnet 146, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Booth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)