User talk:Trj2002

March 2023
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jim Risch. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 23:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Um, I will continue to push for the truth. The truth is not my political ideology, it is the truth. If you have a problem with that, oh well. Trj2002 (talk) 23:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 23:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:34, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

No edit that changes the meaning is "minor".
Hi Trj2002! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Why we don't say "pro-life"
Hello, you might have already seen this explanation on the noticeboard about why we don't say "pro-life", but just in case you didn't get the ping I thought to repost the explanation here: pro-life is not considered to be neutral wording, we use "anti-abortion". If you wanna say that's biased, I want to let you know we also don't say pro-choice. I think you should read up on WP:NPOV. If you continue to edit this way you will likely be either topic banned or blocked from editing entirely. I'd suggest you heed this user's explanation, as neutrality is central to what we do here on Wikipedia. — Czello 11:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)