User talk:Troglopedetes

License tagging for File:Jane & chameleon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jane & chameleon.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Walden writers


A tag has been placed on Walden writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Swimnteach (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Walden Writers


A tag has been placed on Walden Writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  12:30, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Walden Writers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walden Writers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Walden Writers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Cind. amuse  06:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Why don't you make Walden Writers a new section of the Saffron Walden page? You could still link to it like this: Walden Writers. Lots of towns mention their local clubs and associations. Bmcln1 (talk) 09:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

List of English Writers
Thanks for the two travel writers. Please add more writers of all kinds if you can. It's been rather a lonely job building this up! Blessings. Bmcln1 (talk) 09:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AnkaranaExpedition86.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:AnkaranaExpedition86.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Caves changing ecosystems.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:Caves changing ecosystems.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Ankarana article
Thanks for your great work on the Ankarana NP article. It's an awesome place and I'm so glad to see it done justice. Really nice job. 196.44.240.58 (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the encouragement - I've more info that I'd like to add.... but time is the challenge!! Troglopedetes (talk) 07:10, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

I'l like to agree with the unknown user above: Nice article ! Tonton Bernardo (talk) 02:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC) tonton

Thanks v much for the encouragement! Troglopedetes (talk) 15:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Teaching-aids at Low Cost) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Teaching-aids at Low Cost, Troglopedetes!

Wikipedia editor Denver20 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Your Page has been Passed!! Any Doubts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Denver20"

To reply, leave a comment on Denver20's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for January 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teaching-aids at Low Cost, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francoise Hivernel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Institute of Archaeology. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nine Wells, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiffchaff. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Safartu by Francoise Hivernel.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Safartu by Francoise Hivernel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Health Books International) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Health Books International, Troglopedetes!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"This page has been blanked and a REDIRECT created as it completely duplicates an existing page (Teaching-aids at Low Cost). Please make changes to that article if you need to, please."

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 01:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Nick and thanks for reviewing Health Books International. Hope this is posted in the right place!!

I actually wanted to deleted the Teaching-aids at Low cost page as it repeats content.... alternatively I wasn't sure how to change the TALC title to HBI - which is what it is now called. Troglopedetes (talk) 03:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * My apologies for the delay in replying. I did see your message but, as you put it at the top of my Talk Page, rather than the bottom, I subsequently overlooked it. (I thought it best to move it back to your talk page.) I take on board your wish to have the main article renamed. This would normally be v(ery easy to do by a simple 'page move' command. That would then leave a WP:REDIRECT from the old name to the new. However, because we now have a redirect in place which goes the other way round, I can't now do this myself. Leave it with me, and I'll lodge a request with an Administration to do this for us. ( we never delete a page and start and gain just to change and page title as this would throw away all the past history of edits which brought the page to its present state, and that's not an acceptable thing to do. A simple page move is normally all that's required)  Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 09:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Request for renaming now lodged. This normallly takes 7 days or so to implement. Nick Moyes (talk) 11:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Great stuff (talk)!! Many thanks Troglopedetes (talk) 02:33, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)