User talk:Tromatic

Welcome to Wikipedia. I just did a revision of your article on Blood Feast -- if any facts ended up wrong, go ahead and fix 'em. I look forward to seeing more articles on exploitation films! -- Scarequotes 05:08, May 26, 2004 (UTC)

I added Tromeo and Juliet to the list of Romeo and Juliet adaptations, we'll see if it sticks. Stay Tromatized! Ellsworth 01:07, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Image:Lk closeup-tm.jpg
Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Lk closeup-tm.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, – Quadell (talk) (help) 12:46, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Lk_closeup-tm.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lk_closeup-tm.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 19:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Religious debates over the Harry Potter series has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Boracay Bill (talk) 01:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Same-sex marriage has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Thatguyflint  undefined 21:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I have written an article for the book Hail Satan which is a collection of Satanic poetry. A christian user on Wikipedia seems upset and zealous in his efforts to have the article deleted. He has accused the article of vanity, whereas the article reads unbiased. The user in question also argues notability, yet the traffic log for the article since May shows over 1,000 visits. The article has also been accused of lacking sources, yet since this accusation proper sources have been added. The behavioral pattern however is arbitrary meaning when vanity is addressed and leveled - notability is argued, when notability is addressed and leveled - sources are argued. On the surface this seems less to do with an encyclopedic article's pertinence to Satanism and the Occult and rather the concern of christian users on Wikipedia to silence modern representations of Satanism in literature. I want to reach out to you in assuming unbiased concern and ask for your input and participation in the discussion of this article's deletion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hail_Satan_(book) blackson 07:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * My response. - Ian.thomson (talk) 02:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Rick Ross
I've removed your addition of "illegal" from the Rick Ross (consultant) article. Unless you have cites showing that all 350 cases resulted in convictions (i.e. illegal), that's a severe WP:BLP violation. AndroidCat (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)