User talk:Troy102

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Joss Whedon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Biografer (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Joss Whedon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. You know your removal of content from that article is contested, so please start a discussion on the talk page, explain your reasons for its removal, and seek a consensus before you remove it again. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Chickenhawk (bird), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. StonyBrook (talk) 03:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Chickenhawk (bird) does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! StonyBrook (talk) 03:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fallout 76. -- ferret (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits as you did to Queen II. 41.148.80.205 (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Doctor Who (series 11), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- / Alex /21  22:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Who (series 11). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 00:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Final warning for disruptive editing on Doctor Who (series 11)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you you make disruptive edits on Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. -- / Alex /21  02:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Doctor Who (series 11). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – bradv  🍁  04:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Audience scores in movie articles
Please don't add audience scores from Rotten Tomatoes and the IMDb; per MOS:FILM, they don't belong there.  You've gone incognito  (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:07, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Euronymous, you may be blocked from editing. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Euronymous, also dead
You don't say! הראש (talk) 22:06, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2438621363084916&id=100008112274627 הראש (talk) 22:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism, as you did at Euronymous. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)