User talk:TruSunna

July 2014
Sir, please stop replacing validly sourced content such as you did at Hadith of Najd. What has been written there was carefully researched and has been accepted by a number of editors to the point of approaching Consensus. To learn what is acceptable as a source and what is not, please review Identifying reliable sources. The basics of editing can be found at Help:Getting started. If you continue deleting the same validly sourced content as you have done, you will come close to a violation of the Edit warring policy. That's another thing you should review before continuing. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:41, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

You are indeed showing valid sources but have approached the issue in a bias manner, taking into consideration the 'Wahabi' ideology which many Sunnis and Shias alike refute. If you are not Muslim and promote this thinking, it will be wise to reconsider your approach. This tradition is fueling many crisis in the middle east and taking Iraq as Najd is why we see ISIS in Iraq today. It is this wrong interpretations of the so called 'scholars' who discussed such issues that leads people astray. Islam is a religion based on truth and not human opinions. Please re-consider the effects this work has in the outside world. If not, then at least take on the arguments presented in the past post. Otherwise, doing so reveals your motives and ill-intentions to cause strife in the Islamic world.


 * First and foremost, you need to review the No personal attacks policy; attacking other editors as you have done here is not allowed.
 * Second, you seriously need to review Neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not here for you or any other editor to educate readers about their views on who is or isn't "based on truth." All who are willing to help edit constructively may do so, but pushing a certain point or conclusion as you are doing on that hadith article about certain groups isn't encyclopedic nor objective.
 * Please actually review the policies I have suggested. It would be a tremendous help if you could leave being combative and become a constructive and positive to the encyclopedia. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:40, 3 July 2014 (UTC)