User talk:Trubarbie

Unsourced content regarding private, living persons
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Angelo Moore. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This material cannot be added to a Wikipedia article without verification, including the citation of appropriate references. Please read and comply with the important Wikipedia content policies I cited in reply to your talk page postings. You otherwise will seriously jeopardize your editing privileges. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

If you've read the BLP policy, you'd know that we are particularly strict in regards to sourcing and privacy issues on articles about living people. We simply can't take you at your word that Mr. Moore wants you to insert this information, especially given that these are non-public people. Unless you can find sources for this--and not from bulletin boards or other questionable sites either, don't insert this again when your block expires, or you'll be blocked again. Blueboy96 20:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

3RR violation warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

On sourcing
If a subject of an article really does want certain personal details in an article then the best thing to do is to make it so that those details are actually sourceable per our reliable sourcing policy. Easy ways to do this are for the subject to post the details on an official website or to mention them in an interview or something similar. JoshuaZ (talk) 23:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC)