User talk:Truckfan1990

License tagging for File:1987-1990 Leetsdale Fire Department F-350 fire utility vehicle.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:1987-1990 Leetsdale Fire Department F-350 fire utility vehicle.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ford F-250 ambulance.jpeg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ford F-250 ambulance.jpeg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 07:14, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Images taken from the internet
Hi there. Please note that Wikipedia cannot accept images taken from other websites, particularly when their original source is not attributed. I've just deleted one of your uploads as it is a downscaled version of this. In general we only use images you took with your own camera - Peripitus (Talk) 07:16, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The rarest vehicles, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 11:30, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The rarest vehicles


The article The rarest vehicles has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Page consists of uncited personal opinions/original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 331dot (talk) 23:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The rarest vehicles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The rarest vehicles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The rarest vehicles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 19:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ford F-Series ninth generation, you may be blocked from editing. Carmaker1 (talk) 01:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

March 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cartoon Cartoons, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 05:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm William Harris. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gray wolf, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! Gray wolf is rated at Good Article quality level, therefore the standard of edits must be higher than for most other articles. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. William Harris •  (talk) •  11:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm William Harris. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mexican wolf, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Your statement has been reverted once again because it is factually incorrect. Only the first paragraph of the article refers to Arizona Game and Fish, the rest of the article about purported hybrids comes from the Southern Arizona Cattlemen’s Protective Association website that is not a WP:RELIABLE source.''  William Harris •   (talk) •  22:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)