User talk:Truco/Archive 12

Championship articles
I saw your proposal. What about merging the List of (title name) Champions articles into the main articles?-- Unquestionable Truth -- 02:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah that's what I was thinking. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 03:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * We'll I think what you see on both kinds of articles is about all we can add in each. Although if we merge both It wouldn't be a list since a the list of champions would only be half of what the merged article would be. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 17:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * See what'd I say? Do you want to move forward with the merge then? The new one can still retain the main title article name. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 01:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Tallest buildings list
Sure, that would be great! I am always looking to expand Wikipedia's coverage of tallest buildings lists :-) Perhaps we could strive for the list to become a featured list? Anyway, which city or country did you want to work on? Cheers, Rai • me  13:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, List of tallest buildings in Dallas is already an FL, and another editor is workking on List of tallest buildings in Arlington County, Virginia. But I think a List of tallest buildings in Baltimore would be very good for us to work on. You can look at any city at US tallest buildings lists to see what cities have lists and which ones don't, and which ones aren't FLs (currently, 20 of them are, mostly as a result of WikiProject Skyscrapers/Featured Topic Drive). My preferences would be Baltimore, St. Louis, Nashville, Sacramento, or Indianapolis. Cheers, Rai • me  14:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I created a "rough version" List of tallest buildings in Baltimore and tagged it with under construction. It has the main tallest buildings list and references, but needs a longer lead, future buildings section, and a "Timeline of tallest buildings" (see List of tallest buildings in Atlanta). But perhaps the most time consuming process will be creating articles for each of the redlinked skyscrapers in the main list; currently only 3 have articles... Anyway, I will probably work on the list for much of tomorrow. Obviously, feel free to work on anything in the list that you want to, just let me know which section so we can avoid edit conflicts. Cheers, Rai • me  02:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. I'll work on the timeline and perhaps a little on the lead, when you are working on the future buuildings section. Cheers, Rai • me  15:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Great work on the under construction list. But, note that the main "Tallest buildings" list has a height cutoff of 300 ft, so unfortunately that means for consistency reasons the same cutoff will have to be used in the tallest under construction section. So, the last three buildings listed would have to be removed... For this list, I would suggest combining the under construction, proposed and approved lists in the manner of List of tallest buildings in Boston. Cheers, Rai • me  16:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You can use this diagram of only 300 ft+ under construction and proposed buildings in the city to decide which structures to include in the "Tallest under construction or proposed" (it doesn't look as though there are any approved buildings, but Emporis may state otherwise) section. Cheers, Rai • me  16:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Great job! The only thing is, I think the notes are too long; the first two are very good and relevant to the list's topic, but then the last three are rather lengthy. Such long notes are encyclopedic, but have received criticism at FLC for getting off the topic of building height and being “better left for individual articles”. So, I think the best option would be to leave the note entries for 300 East Pratt Street, Four Seasons Baltimore and Residences, and Legg Mason Tower empty, leaving all of the information for those three buildings for their respective individual articles. Do you want to go ahead and create the articles for the three towers? I am going to work on the lead, and then will begin article creation for the redlinks in the main "Tallest buildings" list. Cheers, Rai • me  21:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You can use WikiProject Skyscrapers/Articles as a guide, but the design is really up to you. I usually just try to include all of the relevant information listed at Emporis and SkyscraperPage, and then do a Google search to find any additional information/references. Of course, it is fine to also leave them as stubs. For example, Lighthouse Landing is a "model" for a stub, while 100 North Tampa is suitable for a full article. Cheers, Rai • me  23:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I finished expanding the lead of List of tallest buildings in Baltimore and nominated it at T:TDYK, listing you as a co-nominator. I'm not sure if you still plan to create articles for Four Seasons Hotel Baltimore and Legg Mason Tower (it is fine if you don't, I can do it later), but if you do and still need the information that you listed in the "Notes" column, I wanted to let you know that I hid the text instead of removing it from the article completely. Cheers, Rai • me  23:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I think all that is left now is article creation; for example, if you compare the Baltimore list with List of tallest buildings in Denver (an FL), you will see that they are extremely similar in almost all ways with the exception of redlinks. So, I think that after we create articles, the list will be ready for FLC nomination. Cheers, Rai • me  04:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Great job creating those articles. I will try to get to creating the rest of them today. (Sorry, I got a little sidetracked with List of tallest buildings in Columbus :-) ) Cheers, Rai • me  02:41, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've just nominated it. Thanks for a great collaboration! :-) FYI, I will be leaving tomorrow on vacation and won't have internet access, so I'm afraid I won't be much help this coming week in addressing concerns brought up at the list's nomination. But hopefully there won't be too many, as the list is modeled after existing FLs. Cheers, Rai • me  17:46, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Your GA review of The Great American Bash (2007)
Thanks for reviewing the article. I have addressed all of your concerns. Cheers! -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 21:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Its cool, I think LAX was going to nominate the article, but its all cool. ;) I just hope I can nominate Survivor Series '04. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, believe me I will. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

GA nominees
I'm a little confused. I thought we had reached consensus on two nominations per editor at any given time. You now have five (six, if the video game article is included, but I don't think it should be). GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I GIVE UP!
You are causing me to go insane with all of these edit conflicts at the Draft page, my goodness! Lol. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 00:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll take the evens, I have a fear of odd numbers, lol. I just hate them. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 00:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Next one is all you! -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 00:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It is fun, and got it! -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 00:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm gona need you to take over, I gotta go soon. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 01:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey, you interested in making your signature red and blue for a week? For the 4th of July. I've already made the temporary change. -- iMa tth ew  T. C. 18:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome, ask others to make the change if you have time. -- iMa tth ew  T. C. 00:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Considering you were a supporter of the table format for PPV results, do you mind checking out the thread at WT:PW, about another option? Cheers, -- iMa tth ew  T. C. 15:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

SummerSlam '05 and '06
I didn't put either one of the SummerSlam articles up on the waiting list. I have removed them from WP:GAN as neither of them are ready yet. However, I will better prepare them. Peace, – L A  X  00:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Please don't "take over" Backlash (2004)'s nomination when it's time to nominate it. I placed it up on the waiting list the other day, but will be on vacation come time to nominate it. I will nominate it as soon as I get back on July 7. Thanks, – L A  X  02:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, that wasn't me who did that. I, unlike some others, keep track of what I put up there. :P – L A  X  02:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, did you remove Survivor Series '04 from GAN? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I wasn't mad, its just that I had articles to review and I forgot about your message. You should've just kept the nomination, now I'm gonna have to nominate the article, great. I wasn't mad at all. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think you can revert your edits, I don't want you to get in trouble at GAN that's why. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I should apologize for not responding to you sooner, but I was busy with GA reviews. Anyways, I'll nominate the article, after I'm done with this review I'm doing. And again, I was not mad. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No difference at all, I guess. Also, congrats on your 2nd FL. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Maybe you can help out when the GA review comes to town. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, man. I really appreciate it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

GA review
I'd just like to thank you for your extremely helpful review and additional comments at Talk:10 m Air Pistol/GA1. They have certainly helped turn an acceptable article into a good one. I'll keep improving it if I can, though. -- Jao (talk) 09:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

A little something
Kudos on this. Getting something to be featured these days is not an easy task. Nikki 311  19:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Terrible Towel GA
Thanks for your GA review on Terrible Towel. I fixed most, but have a few questions which I left on the review page, check 'em out when you can. Your suggestions for all the re-wordings really helped. Thanks!  Black  ngold29   01:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome dude! Thanks for all your help.  Black  ngold29   21:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

WWE SmackDown (video game series)
I've finished copyediting the article. I'm confused about one statement, though. In the final paragraph, it states, "It improved from the previous three WWF SmackDown! games, as it was written by actual WWE storyline writers." What does "it" refer to? "Shut Your Mouth" and "Here Comes the Pain" were both mentioned in the previous sentence. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Peer Review reply
I've replied to you at the peer review for Lockdown. here.-- Will C  03:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I've worked on Lockdown a little more. Is it any better now? here.-- Will C  21:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

The lead is bigger in Backlash.-- Will C  01:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay I'll do that. I'll see if I can find the info about the buyrate. Also I'll write some of the aftermath in there to. Next?-- Will C  02:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

It is already like that.-- Will C  02:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Improved. Any better?-- Will C  03:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Are these sources anybetter? Prowrestling.about.com, PWWEW.net, Online world of wrestling.com, PWTorch.com, Online World of Wrestling.com2, PWTorch.com, and ProwrestlingHistory.com. Those are all good right?. I got them from Backlash 2003. Also I guess 411Mania is okay since it was in Backlash.-- Will C  03:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Fixed.-- Will C  03:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I think I'm going to remove all the references in Lockdown. Then look for all that I can find from Online World of Wrestling, WrestleView, 411Mania, PWtorch, Slam Sports, gerweck.net, and any that TNA still has up. Hopefully I won't over source.-- Will C  08:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

At most I'll reference each 2 times. I'll probably stick with Wrestling Observer, WrestleView, Slam, PWTorch, and Online World of Wrestling. Get results for Lockdown from the other ones.-- Will C  19:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I understand that too. I've already got enough that I won't do that. I'm going to use each probably no more than 10 times. I'm working on it in my sandbox right now. After I have them all placed in there I'll tell you so you can take a look at it.-- Will C  20:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh okay, I'll take a look at it. I've mostly been trying to make sure that part of the lead you told me to write, to add some of the aftermath in there, is right. I've been looking at Survivor Series (2004) and something else. Also tell me if Victory Road (2008) is good so far, if you don't mind that is?-- Will C  20:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Good, that is one ppv down. I wrote the entire Victory Road ppv and placed everyone of those references in there. Also I created the page. So I'm glad at least something I wrote is good.-- Will C  21:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Do you think I'm a idiot?-- Will C  00:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I have been screwing up alot lately and I wanted to know if you got the impression that I don't know what I'm doing on here.-- Will C  01:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I just didn't want you to think that I don't know what I'm doing. Really the only thing I don't know about on here are the small things. I've just recently started to expand articles so I've learned alot more since starting to do that.-- Will C  01:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay. Hopefully I won't screw up anymore. I plan on getting all of TNA's PPVs to GA status one day. I want to get all of the Bound for Glories to FA status though.-- Will C  02:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah it is going to be hard. But Bound for Glory IV isn't until October. When that time comes around I hope to not be working on Sacrifice (2008), Lockdown (2008), Slammiversary (2008), Destination X (2008), Victory Road (2008), and Hard Justice (2008). So that I can focus on that article more and have the entire Background very good before the event even happens. With all the references that I need. Just focus on it more than any other article. Night and Day just perfecting it to give the TNA section it's first FA article. As long as the Bound for Glories are FA I don't care about the other TNA PPVs. After they are all GA and the BFGs are FA that is when I'll start working on the others to get to FA. I'm setting the bar pretty high but that is my goal. I've thought about making a page just for the TNA weekly pay-per-views but not sure. If I do that it will probably be after everything above is done.-- Will C  03:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah that is what i'm focusing alot on right now. I don't plan to fail on the Lockdown nomination. In the time it will take before it is nominated, I will have it fixed. In the mean time that is going on I'll probably have Sacrifice and Slammiversary ready. Since Slammiversary doesn't need alot of major work. Victory Road will be perfect by the time hard Justice happens. So probably by No Surrender (2008) it will be up for GA.-- Will C  04:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I know this sounds insane but I was wondering if using videos from TNA's youtube page as a reference would be okay or a good idea. I thought to get some feed back from you before I do it. I don't really see any harm in it. Instead of it being a article it is the real announcement.-- Will C  01:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Tallest building lists
The person you want to talk to is User:Raime. She has produced about a dozen FL-class lists of this sort. You can also inquire with WP:SKY. My opinion would be no, but ask them.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Tallest buildings in DC
Excellent. Let's get it started. Remember (talk) 04:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I have now started the article here List of the tallest buildings in Washington, D.C.. Help out if you can! Remember (talk) 04:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Great job on the article so far. I'll work to clean up my citations.  I usually save that until the last part of polishing an article. Remember (talk) 02:11, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome! I'll work towards finishing the article up. Remember (talk) 01:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all of your help on the article. I'm glad to see this article got up to DYK status and it's largely thanks to you. Remember (talk) 17:08, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Today is going to be tough for me to add all the red linked articles, but this is a goal of mine. I'm just really busy today. Remember (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I'll say what I couldn't say in time...
…on the TfD for Undercon.

I didn't really care what the outcome became on it; since I knew it was redundant, I figured there were others like it or it would be redirected anyway. &mdash; $PЯINGεrαgђ  04:23 4 July, 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Just reminding you to change your signature back to the normal colors. =] Also, can you please go to the COTW, and vote. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 15:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations, you are a marker!
Lol, I was using one of these today, and I just thought I'd share with you. Haha. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 01:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

There's no need to shout
This: is an unnecessary edit summary. Not every editor understands things, but that doesn't give you the right to shout in an edit summary. Relax, instead of yelling because someone asked something. Not everyone that visits Wikipedia is an expert at the encyclopedia. RobJ1981 (talk) 04:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Yeah, kinda. I'm reformatting all the results section in PPVs into the table format. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:03, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I couldn't help! ;( ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Not at the moment. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, what list do you have in mind? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you want me to remove the red links? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, alright. Sorry about that, I'm a little tired that's why. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, just hit me with some examples, the redirects you want me to link to the red links and you'll have your list done. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Again sorry, I'm very tired. But sure, I'll help you create articles for the red links. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the long wait response, my computer is running a little slow. Um yeah, I'll give it out some feedback to SummerSlam. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I wanna run something by you; in the lead, it states "Following the event, Goldberg continued to feud with Triple H", alright, then the next sentence talks about them meeting at Unforgiven, now, this is all me, but shouldn't the sentence about them continuing their feud and meeting at Unforgiven, maybe, be combined together, instead of it one sentence and then another? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's true. But, I remember when I was fixing stuff of a GA review, I was told to combine the sentence or something. IDK. Like I said, I wanted to run it by you. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, your talking to a GA reviewer. ;) I'm just kidding. Yeah, it all depends on what the reviewer thinks the sentence should say. I sorta do wish they wouldn't make it so damn tough though when it comes to reviews. I was tempted to review Backlash '03, but dang, its long. :p --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No, its a compliment. :) Yeah, I know, I've reviewed 2005 Sugar Bowl and 2006 ACC Championship Game. So, I don't want to go through that again. Yeah, you did some work for Survivor Series and that would be conflict of interest. But, after I'm done with the PR for SS'03, I'll give Backlash another look. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

TBH, it has some similarity to SS'07. But, I think after getting it done with the GA review, that's when you nominate it, the article has the chance at being FA. ;) Let's just hope the "system" cools down. :p --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Because of the wrestling "vocab". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Not that I remember. Believe me, I've read SS'07 and the vocab is there. Not that is a bad thing, but that's why it failed. The funny thing about this is that Gary told me in order for a PPV to be FA status, it should contain the "vocab". :p --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I wonder if we can just submit an article, the way it is, and see if it passes as FA. ;) Hey, is 411mania a reliable source? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Probably, let's try a test with it. ;) I know you told me, I just want to be sure. I'm sorta having thoughts on adding it to Shawn's article, to replace Hoffco and PWWEW. But, IDK. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought WrestleView was not reliable. There was a whole discussion about it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. ;) If you're interested, I have an article up at GAN. ;) Hey, do you think you can help out with writing the event for the Bash '06? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool, me and LAX will be waiting. ;) Awesome, you are such a lifesaver. :P And, no thank you's needed, I told you I was going to review the article and I stuck with my word. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * SummerSlam '04. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's right. Damn. How 'bout Unforgiven '07? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I know, me and LAX wrote it. ;) Alright, I'll be waiting. :p --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but I really didn't do any work, so I don't think I deserve credit. Um, I just went through SS and looks fine, if there were problems then I would have mention it at PR. Question: Why are the wrestlers real name mentioned after their ring name? Hey, how does Unforgiven '03 look? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, well I don't know what's going on these days with what needs to be done with the PPV's. Um, I don't really want to put a PR up, but if you have time to give the problems out, I'll be sure to fix them. Not today, I gotta log off in a little while. But, it would be most appreciated it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, Matt is also gonna give some feedback to the article. Unless, the two of you guys want to give some feedback together? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:51, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, cool. I guess that can work and I wish you good luck with SS passing FA. ;) Maybe we can collaborate on a PPV and see if its FA material. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * That was corny. I'm just playing. ;) But, it does make sense, though. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:08, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU, Status, and you!
As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible system) - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot  23:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (July 2008)

 * Newsletter delivered by xenobot  03:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

SVR 2009
Hey man I really do not know why SVR 2009 should not have a roster list yet.I just do not get it.Well you got more experience so you may be right.--Shabe0mac (talk) 00:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Shabe0mac

SummerSlam (2003)
Never put a ref in a header as you did here. That completely messes up the formatting. Thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 18:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * OK. Just thought I'd let you know anyway. D.M.N. (talk) 18:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

User:SRX/Created Articles
Could I use your engenuis chart (here) to improve my list? I will credit you fully for creating it. Please respond on my talk page. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 21:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: SummerSlam
1) Thank you for the birthday wishes! 2) Sure, I'll get around to it sometime tomorrow! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:44, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * oh, damn! I forgot! Sorry, I'll do it now. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:24, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD/WP:LOTM
Congratulations on getting what appears to be your first successful WP:FL during the last month. You may want to get involved in our List of the Day/List of the Month experiment. Feel free to help us select next months lists at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200808 or nominate your list for consideration to be a LOTD in September at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/Nominees/200809.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

NWO FL in sandbox
WWE One Night Stand will give you a brief idea of what the table should be like for the NWO FL main article. Thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * That list was determined as too small. Royal Rumble is another example, although that doesn't implement that table, and arguably more information can get put into there. D.M.N. (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, should be OK. =D D.M.N. (talk) 21:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: WWE No Way Out
It looks pretty good. It should be good to go. I'm kind of surprised that there isn't enough content to build it into a Featured Article instead. The text in the "Main Event(s):" column is really small for me; also, the colons are not needed in the column headings. Gary King ( talk ) 02:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

WWE No Way Out
Yes, I saw. Good. I'll now wait and see how the community finds it. Good luck! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Mark Lanegan discography
Finished with the tasks you gave me. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 16:24, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Hows it been
It's good to talk with you again dude. How have you been since we last talked? King  Rock (Gears of War) 19:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup I'm in Hawii right now. King  Rock (Gears of War) 20:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well recently I've been working hard to revert vandals, write GA, and welcome new users. I wrote my first GA here. King  Rock (Gears of War) 20:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Dang! You have been busy. Good job! My current projects are Blue Dragon(GAN), Warriors: Firestar's Quest(trying to get to GA status), and acessing unacessed VG article for WP:VG(and your not a dick :P) King  Rock (Gears of War) 20:39, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure. King  Rock (Gears of War) 21:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow...that article is pretty good...what do you need me to help you with? King  Rock (Gears of War) 21:07, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * And when I say that I mean, what part needs to be improved? King  Rock (Gears of War) 21:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay.<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#7D0008"> King <font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#FFBE26"> Rock (Gears of War) 21:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I like to create articles by starting them in my sandbox first so if you dont see them automatically, just search: User:Gears of War/article name.<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#7D0008"> King <font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#FFBE26"> Rock (Gears of War) 21:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * One down.<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#7D0008"> King <font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#FFBE26"> Rock (Gears of War) 21:45, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure. I been looking for a partner to help me create articles.<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#7D0008"> King <font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#FFBE26"> Rock (Gears of War) 21:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I have to log off. I'll try to return later tonight to finish helping(I got dibs on creating the Republic Building article!)<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#7D0008"> King <font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#FFBE26"> Rock (Gears of War) 22:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue
 * 2) 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue
 * 3) 600 Thirteenth Street
 * Great job with the article. Goood luck in the FLN.(dibs meens that I wanted to create it myself)<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#7D0008"> King <font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#FFBE26"> Rock (Gears of War) 03:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Later dude.<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#7D0008"> King <font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#FFBE26"> Rock (Gears of War) 04:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:List of tallest buildings in Washington, D.C.
I will, I just have to finish with List of tallest buildings in Hong Kong first. I should be done with creating articles for that page in a few hours. Cheers, Rai • me  21:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I need a little break from Hong Kong, so I'll work on the DC articles ;) Cheers, Rai • me  00:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Of course! We could always use the help ;) The only thing that is really left is article creation, but pretty much all of the articles left are about complexes, so it takes a little longer to write them. Cheers, Rai • me  00:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Right back at you ;) Interested in another? Cheers, Rai • me  02:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Great job on the list of tallest buildings so far! It will be a FL in no time! Remember (talk) 00:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Again great job on completing the articles. I'll be watching the nomination.  Let me know what I can do to help. Remember (talk) 11:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Reply
✅ -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 23:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I know. I'm taking a request tonight, and then I might just rest, or do some recent changes patrolling. I'll get over to FLC tomorrow night. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 00:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If you think you deserve credit, go ahead and take it. You don't have to ask me, I don't own the article. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 10:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

WWE lists etc
No worries. Let's hope you can get some support for those lists! And yes, I remember. Or, at least, your signature was remeniscent! The Rambling Man (talk) 13:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Major League Baseball Rookie of the Year Award
I've taken care of your comments. Thanks, «  Milk's Favorite  Cøøkie  18:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * "Suppose"? - Ha. «  Milk's Favorite  Cøøkie  18:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Washington State Route 531
Washington State Route 531 is currently up for A-Class review. Since you were the GA reviewer of the article, you may be interested. Please leave comments at this link. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 17:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Yearbook
Nope sorry, it's only 2002. Was there anything in particular you were looking for? D.M.N. (talk) 14:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Slam! Sports and WrestleView provide enough detail for the match results, don't they? Do you have the event on DVD? D.M.N. (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No I don't know how to write out-of-universe (although I try my best too.. =D) D.M.N. (talk) 18:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: SummerSlams
Sure, man. I'm up for anything. I'll look into it tomorrow. I am currently working on two other articles, so progress may be slow. ;) – L A  X  22:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sure we can. If we are able to, this will be a huge step in WP:PW's PPV expansion project. – L A  X  22:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * As was I, my friend. – L A  X  22:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * How does the lead for SS '07 look so far? (Before and after (diff)). – L A  X  23:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes indeed! – L A  X  00:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure yet. I'm trying to come up with something now. – L A  X  00:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * How does that look? – L A  X  01:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I was thinking the third paragraph in the lead. – L A  X  02:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It looks good, but I would consider splitting the second paragraph. It's seems a little bit too long. – L A  X  02:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It looks good. Very long, but good. ;) I was, but I just never got around to it. I guess I'll just do it now. :P – L A  X  02:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I know. I was just pointing that out. – L A  X  11:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey. Do you think you could GA review Backlash (2004) for me, please? – L A  X  01:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I have fixed most of your concerns, and have addressed the few I haven't. – L A  X  04:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Peer Review and then Waiting List?
It seems excessive to do both. I generally don't use Peer Review anymore because the last three or four got only a semi-automated review. GaryColemanFan (talk) 17:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

GA review completed
I completed your requests. Thanks for the review. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 12:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, if you could do another one, maybe Vengeance: Night of Champions...that would be mega-cool. ;) -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 14:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I have added the feud between Jericho and Christian & Stratus. There really isn't much, but that was all I could find. – L A  X  14:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, man. I know, I'm having trouble with wording. I could only seem to use "as part of the storyline" and "as part of the scripted events." – L A  X  01:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Do I know?
I've don't expand many recent pay-per-view articles, so I don't know of any. I thought WrestleView might have do reviews, but I looked just now and couldn't find anything but results. I'm sorry I can't be of more help. :( Nikki  311  19:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

RE:
I felt it was useless. TNA only has four titles. TNA's website and WWE's website are very different. They just have the title history all rolled into one, they have really no archives, and I've got alot to do right now. Lockdown goes up for GAN here in a few days. I'm about to place Sacrifice (2008) up for a Peer review after I'm done with it in my sandbox. I have to finish Victory Road (2008), Destination X (2008), and the TNA 2008 World X Cup Tournament (which I'll try to get to Fl, when I start to work on it). I have to copyedit Slammiversary (2008) and add references in it so it will be a GA. Trying to get this article to FL right now can wait. No one is going to edit it besides me and a few others that find it. Thanks anyway, though you can try to work on TNA Bound for Glory which is TNA's main ppv of the year. I was eventually going to do what you're trying to do with WWE No Way Out with it and all the other TNA ppvs.-- Will C  02:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, I've noticed that a few PPV articles have been stating how many titles were defended. Does that have to be done for all PPV articles now? Also is adding the section "Reception" have to be done for all now or is that just for ones that are being made for FA?-- Will C  03:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, well crap this is going to be a problem for me since I can't get the buyrate stuff from TNA and I don't know where to look. I can do the titles part and what Wrestling Observer and Slam thought of the ppv but the buyrate and a few other things for PPVs will be hard on the TNA side since they aren't a publicly traded company like WWE is.-- Will C  04:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've been there and for some reason they don't place them up. Yeah I understand. I was just wondering. I guess I can just place what WO and Slam thought of it and what the public thought of it. I guess maybe a paragraph will do. Thanks for the bandstar. It means alot.-- Will C  04:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, I wrote the Reception to Lockdown 2008. And I wanted to know what you thought of it. I mainly copied off of SummerSlam (2003) so if it sounds familiar then that is why. It is located here.-- Will C  09:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, though I think I'm going to add the info about TNA's fan interaction and when the tickets went on sale in the lead since I feel their notable. At least I have it wrote and finished so I don't have to write it last minute if we do start the new section.-- Will C  19:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Alright, I just think they should be added in there since it seems notable to me about the Fan Interaction. Give me feed back when you can.-- Will C  19:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, talk to you later. I'm going to go fix Sacrifice.-- Will C  19:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi :)
Hi,

How are you?

Best! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moviesforu2008 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey.
Hey man, I know we havent talked in a while but can me and you work on an article together?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 1:42, 22 July (UTC)

Oh, Ok thats cool. I don't want to waste any of your time. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 1:48, 22 July (UTC)

Yeah, thanks for saying that, because everyone else doesn't like me on here. Cimmo (talk) 1:58, 22 July (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar. Do you know how to write a GA, because I don't no how to. No-one will help me with articles and I have trouble and I just want to know how to write one. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 1:58, 22 July (UTC)

If you get time would be able to help me with Armageddon 2003 which is located here. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 3:44, 22 July (UTC)

Hey, what have you been up to?. Cimmo (talk) 1:21, 23 July (UTC)

Me either. Cimmo (talk) 1:27, 23 July (UTC)