User talk:Truco/Archive 22

Re:
It may be "Blue" at my talkpage, I wonder what Truco is up to? IDK, I couldn't think of anything. The list is "fine", I guess. If you can check out the lead for an improvement, I would appreciate it. IDK, yesterday I had thoughts of nominating it, but I didn't it. Maybe, I'll nominate [it] later this week. Also, I've responded. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll respond to them. I've written back. So, what's new with you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've responded to both of your comments. Same here, just enjoying my break from school, which I really needed. :) Anything particular that you're working on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, I've gotten your concern[s] and will get them at FLC, if it goes well. :) That's cool, good luck on it. Me, I'm working on Brad Pitt's article, hopefully I can nominate it to FAC soon. I'll probably see you there too. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll see you at the two Featured places. Hopefully, you don't go ALL hardcore on me. ;) I've responded as well. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What? You think your tough now? :) You got mail. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh no, I'm scared. ...ThinkBlue then grabbed Truco in a chinlock hold, only for Truco to reverse the hold and hit a back body drop. Then, the match went back and forth. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please, I could take you down in a second. :) Alright, I'm going for it, wish me luck. Also, I think you know the deal. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hit me with your best shot :) Are you sure you replied? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:26, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hopefully, I got your query at the FLC. Also, back and forth. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: ER
Nah, feel free to archive it. – Juliancolton  | Talk 02:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:Your ER

 * Nah it's cool man you can close it. :)  Aaroncrick (Tassie Boy talk) 03:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers  Aaroncrick (Tassie Boy talk) 05:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Question of List
Considering you've gotten more FL's than me and understand the process and what makes an FL more than me, I want to get your opinion on a list before I create it and put it on FLC. It is List of ROH World Champions. I've been working on it in a subpage. Sources are a bit hard to find that are not ROH, but dear God do the ones I have tell everything you need to know. It is located at User:Wrestlinglover/Sandbox 3. I wanted to get your opinion if it will pass. I have three general refs and only two specific, with one just being a reused general ref to make sure somethings were sourced off the bat. Two general refs are a lists of title holders, with the one directly from ROH giving all the champions, their successful defenses, title names, and when it was unified with the ROH Pure Wrestling Championship. While the last general ref is a list of all of ROH's event results. All PPVs and DVD events. The specific refs are the ROH Title history from ROH that I used to source directly the unification of the Pure championship, the current champion, and the name change. The last one is How Pro Wrestling works, which you probably know what is used for. That is it, I don't think I need anymore sources. I've got notes and everything else I've done for the tag and x title lists done, but considering I've got a low amount of refs, I wanted an experienced opinion first.-- Will C  06:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, what were the format problems?-- Will C  03:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry, I didn't notice that page was created. Alright, well I made some fixes and left some replies regrading some of the changes. Thanks for the review.-- Will C  05:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Ged UK  07:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: ER (again)
No worries, thanks for helping the project. Cyclonenim : Chat  09:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:
Hi there, thanks for telling me about the ER. I forgot about it. :) You may achieve it if you'd like. I'm finished with it. Thanks again. Papercutbiology♫ (talk) (Sign here!) 10:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Preload
Featured list preload Gary King  ( talk ) 19:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * See Template:FLC/editintro. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * See Template:FLC. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:WPPWlogo.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:WPPWlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

FLC nominations and reviews
Hi, Truco. You may not be aware, but the new Featured list criteria was implemented Sunday 5 April, 00:56 (UTC) following two weeks of discussion at Wikipedia talk:Featured list criteria.

I've gone through the nominations and have noticed you have !voted Support, Oppose or Neutral at the following nominations: Please could you take the time to revisit the articles and candidate pages, and check them against the new Featured list criteria, and confirm/revise your !vote; any !vote made against the old criteria that is not confirmed against the new criteria will be ignored when the nomination is closed.
 * 1) Featured list candidates/List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks/archive1 (List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks)
 * 2) Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by WALL-E/archive1 (List of awards and nominations received by WALL-E)
 * 3) Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Sheryl Crow/archive1 (List of awards and nominations received by Sheryl Crow)
 * 4) Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Ratatouille/archive1 (List of awards and nominations received by Ratatouille)
 * 5) Featured list candidates/Gene Kelly filmography/archive1 (Gene Kelly filmography)
 * 6) Featured list candidates/List of places of worship in Crawley/archive1 (List of places of worship in Crawley)
 * 7) Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Blackhawks players/archive4 (List of Chicago Blackhawks players)
 * 8) Featured list candidates/Michael Faraday Prize/archive1 (Michael Faraday Prize)
 * 9) Featured list candidates/Veronica Mars (season 2)/archive1 (Veronica Mars (season 2))
 * 10) Featured list candidates/List of number-one albums of 2008 (U.S.)/archive1 (List of number-one albums of 2008 (U.S.))
 * 11) Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 2007–08 South Pacific cyclone season/archive2 (Timeline of the 2007–08 South Pacific cyclone season)
 * 12) Featured list candidates/List of Silver Slugger Award winners at third base/archive1 (List of Silver Slugger Award winners at third base)

Finally, please accept my apologies for the brusqueness of this message; the same wording is being sent to everyone who has outstanding reviews, with only the names of lists being changed. Regards, Matthewedwards : Chat  04:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash; Oli OR Pyfan! 11:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Title Lists
Gavyn Sykes recommended I should ask you, but Gavyn reverted some edits of mine when removing excessive wikilinks to the same article page at List of World Heavyweight Champions (WWE). All other FLs like the IC title history are in accordance with the overlinking guideline. When I asked him, he said you knew more about the consensus. Can you clarify?  Raaggio  15:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You wrote "per WP:LINK", but I read the whole guideline and there is no mention of any exceptions regarding tables. As a matter of fact, there is no mention of tables whatsoever.  Raaggio  16:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * When you're right you're right. I used Google Cache to find any mention of the word "table", but apparently it didn't look for "tables". My bad,  Raaggio  17:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess we have to fix the IC, US, WWE Tag Team, World Tag Team, WCW, ECW, European... and every other list. I'll get right on it.  Raaggio  17:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Question
Not sure to be honest. It's a mix of automated and manual, but you might want to dig around my monobook.js for it. – Juliancolton  | Talk 15:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank You
Truco, thank you for leaving comments for both List of TNA X Division Champions and List of TNA World Tag Team Champions during their FLCs. As you know, TNA X Division Champions passed. Hopefully TNA World Tag Team Champions will pass as well. I thank you for taking the time out to review both, as well as give a pre-creation review for List of ROH World Champions.-- Will C  00:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I thought you were done. That is why I went ahead.-- Will C  20:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Is there any problems with the article I should take care of, because I don't see any.-- Will C  21:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I wrote that message and then noticed the comments. It was weird, I hit save. Went to the FLC and there were comments. I felt like a retard. They are finished.-- Will C  21:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Editor review
Thanks for the advice, but one question: Did you mean something else by "WP:AVI"? That redirects to Administrator intervention against vandalism, a noticeboard that, according to WikiChecker, I have edited 374 times. No questions on the rest, thanks again.--Res2216firestar 00:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks.--Res2216firestar 01:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/2008 NBA Draft/archive1
The undrafted players section is removed. You asked me to notify you about that on the FLC.— Chris!  c t 01:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: HOF
Okay. I've finished my part, too, so we can go back and start fixing things. I'll be busy until early next week, so my editing will be sparse. Feel free to start without me, and I'll help when I finish all of my term papers and life stuff. Nikki ♥  311  02:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

My ER
Thanks Truco for your comments. I'll try XFD and ER but for RFA I still think I need more experience. Disputes I know will happen. Its better not to provoke it further. There will be people dramatizing everything, but oh well.*shrug*. --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 05:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ohh. I get it. Thanks Truco. I will try to involve myself in Rfa. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 07:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Rewrite of ER beginning
Check out my reorganization,. Be sure to address the inline question. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I made some more changes. Also, I removed the sentence in question. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Also see my changes to the editintro. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm better at articles, but I will try my best. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

FLC
Hi! You asked me to notify you when your comments at Featured list candidates/List of Oslo T-bane stations/archive1 had been addressed. They have now. Thanks. Arsenikk (talk)  20:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Truco, I just want to remind you that adding refbegin and refend is unnecessary. Please don't add it or ask others to add it in your FLC reviews, as it causes WP:ACCESS problems. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Same way, but without refbegin and refend. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Sorry
Apologies accepted. ;) D.M.N. (talk) 17:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Newsletter
Actually on my browser, it is a lot bigger on the rught side than the left, which is why I change it. And I'm changing it this week as well. On my browser, when the right side is bigger than left column, the wording in the left column starts to run on past the dividing line, meaning you can't read part of it. I'm sure I'm not the only person who receives this newsletter who has this browser, so I change it if it needs it. I personally think readability is a lot more important than having "article noms and related stuff" on one side and the "tips and notices" on the other side. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 09:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey. Yeah, I guess I could start to come back. I most certainly not will not be as active as I previously was, but I will try to be as productive as I can. And thanks for the welcome back! -- L A  X  23:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes I did, very much! I probably will not be editing the new pay-per-views and whatnot very much. In my honest opinion, WWE, and wrestling in general, is as bad as ever. It is nothing like it was, say, two years ago. But hey, that is just my opinion. -- L A  X  23:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm sure. Yeah. I would say things took a turn for the worse around No Mercy 2007. Somewhere around there. Anyway, I might. I should get into the rhythm of things first. -- L A  X  23:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Which is good. It was bound to happen sooner or later. -- L A  X  23:53, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, man! -- L A  X  00:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't say that I do completely. I'm going to have to do some homework and read over! -- L A  X  00:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No I have not. I suppose I should, huh? -- L A  X  00:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * In that case, I will take your word for it and keep my distance. -- L A  X  00:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, I have been contacted by people about the newsletter, most likely because my name is usually listed first on the contributors section, because of the alphabetical order, so in that case I think it's useful. I also don't see "other newsletter don't do this" as a valid rationale. We are not other newsletters, we do not have to conform to their stylistic purposes, and nor should we strive to. I say keep the section. It's adds a little more of a personal touch. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 12:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

When linking to stuff on the toolserver...
...did you know that you can use an interwiki link? tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dabfinder.py?page=Design_1047_battlecruiser will link to tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dabfinder.py?page=Design_1047_battlecruiser. I was asked to do this before, so I figured that I'd pass it on. :) Cheers, —  Ed 17  (Talk /  Contribs)  02:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Protection
Doesn't look like protection is needed at the moment, but I'll keep an eye on it. Cheers, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Happy 's Day!
For a userbox you can put on your userpage, please see User:Dylan620/Today/Happy Me Day!.
 * Yup, see the tiny caption just above. :) -- Dylan 620   2  Master 17:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Done

 * Did already.-- Will C  22:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Featured list candidates/List of ROH World Champions/archive1: Maybe you can answer the two questions regrading sources for me at the bottom, please? I'm drawing a blank, and I got them from lists you write.-- Will C  22:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You think you can compare two articles for me? Just so I can get another opinion and ease my nerves.-- Will C  00:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Could you compare the World Heavyweight Championship (WWE) article to the TNA X Division Championship article? I just want to make sure the format is good, enough that is not a quick fail at GAN.-- Will C  00:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Well I was trying to think of another name for the section but just couldn't figure out anything good. I only state two things, the unification and the title being called a world championship, which we really need to move World Heavyweight Championship to the slang article. I was thinking about adding a section on the Ultimate X match, so people understand the X Division a bit more. Or just give a section about speciality matches this title is defended in. What do you think?-- Will C  02:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm going to re-write the X Division section but at the moment I'm trying to figure out a good format. I was thinking something like this:

==X Division==

===Speciality matches===

==History==

===Creation===

===Significant moments===

===Belt design===

==Reigns==

I thought it was pretty good when I finished it, but I'm now believing I don't explain enough and do not have enough sources. This one is actually the hardest out of all of TNA's belts to explain and source.-- Will C  02:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, thanks for the feed back.-- Will C  03:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Iced Earth discography/archive1
Hey!, take a look in this page, maybe you find something interesting.--Best,  C  anniba loki  00:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Featured list removal candidates/List of longest suspension bridge spans/archive1
There's a lot of problems that need to be addressed, but could you revisit and outline what problems are still standing? I'm inclined to delist, but I'll leave this open until Sunday (when GimmeBot next runs). — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 01:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi
I'm AndSalX-WWECR but I'm not logged. Sorry for Spamming but if you see [link restricted] You will see A-Train losing by Submission against Chris Benoit.

-201.207.245.14 (talk) 14:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of ROH World Tag Team Champions/archive1
Your concerns have been addressed at the above FLC.-- Will C  19:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

The
This Article

-201.207.245.14 (talk) 22:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Swimming World Swimmers of the Year
Did some work.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 02:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

FLC
Thanks for the support, also it is funny I improve on the last list I have to take to FLC unless TNA do a clusterfuck and have about four more TNA World Heavyweight Champions in about a month. Though we'll have about two here in less than two months. Thanks for both.-- Will C  04:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, thank you very much. Hopefully I can find about a few more lists around here to take. Maybe List of TNA PPVs. No one has tried with any of those yet. I might even go where no man has gone before and try this out at least once.-- Will C  14:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey, you want help on that? I was thinking about working on the 09 draft. Was going to ask you since you did last year's. Forgot about it.-- Will C  14:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Cool I don't care. Another one under my beat and I get the experience of working on the WWE stuff. Also check Lockdown (2009)'s pre-show out tonight on PPV. It is free just go to your PPv channel if you have one. Should be a pretty good match between EY and Bonaduce. He says he can do a Swanton and he got beat up by Team 3D Friday to see if he can take pain. It was funny.-- Will C  15:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, will do. Probably later, I didn't sleep last night and I'm in a weird state.-- Will C  21:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Dabomb87 (talk) 15:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * And again. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * One more time. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:49, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, Featured list candidates/List of San Francisco Giants managers/archive1 needs to be revisited. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Help requested
I know you're rather busy, but if you have a few spare minutes, I was hoping you could take a look at the Yukon Quest FAC. A reviewer asked that I get another set of eyes to look it over. I think the prose is fine, but (s)he disagrees. Anyway, any help you could provide would be appreciated. Thanks! JKBrooks85 (talk) 23:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Big East Conference football awards
Hey Truco, would you have any suggestions for Big East Conference football awards before a FLC nom? Thanks,  Grsz 11  01:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, not today. I will be offline until Monday, if you can wait that long :) Dabomb87 (talk) 02:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

OTE99 Spoken
I have the files, I may try to upload them tomorrow. Feel free to listne then comment about them, on the files talk pages, once they exist. Darrenhusted (talk) 15:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

IT WAS USED IN THE WWE'S RECAP PACKAGE FOR THE SHOW ITSELF THEREFORE IT IS TECHNICALLY OFFICAL!!! The Armageddon 2008 article has "Chinese Democracy" by Guns n Roses listed as the theme which wasn't even used at any point during the actual PPV, why is that still there and "Touched" by VAST keeps getting removed although it WAS used??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.241.21 (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

2009 WWE Draft
I went through the text portion of the article. I hope I did not misunderstand any part or introduce mistakes. Regards, &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 23:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry I didn't work on the aftermath section. I got hit with a shit load of work and other stuff. I just didn't have time or the will to even think about working on it. Again, sorry and good luck with the FLC.-- Will C  05:06, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Its cool. Thanks.-- 15:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire/archive1
Hi, Truco! I know you're busy and I'm sorry to disturb you. However, from the comments you left on the FLC page of the aforementioned list, it seemed to me that you intended to do a full review of it, but were simply waiting for the lead to be shortened. I have shortened the lead, so any additional comments by you are welcome. Regards. --BomBom (talk) 00:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, Truco. I wasn't aware that it was not OK to notify members of a WikiProject of an ongoing FLC, and ask them to review it (just review, not support). To me, it seemed logical to notify them because people from an article's WikiProject are likely to be familiar with the topic and are thus the most apt to do content-related comments. Anyway, I'm sorry if my actions violated any policy of which I wasn't aware. I will no longer notify WikiProject members when submitting an FLC in the future. I left a comment about the issue on the list's FLC page, so that FL directors are fully informed of everything when they decide to close the nomination. Regards. --BomBom (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

FLC
I hear that you are semi-retiring. I just wanted to say thanks for all of your help with FLC and especially all of the hard work you have done with reviews. Have fun with your semi-retirement and hopefully you can return some day. -- Scorpion 0422  03:21, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Same here. Thanks for all your hard work and return soon. You will be missed. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * WTF? Hope you could still edit when you have free time, and good luck in your real life. It's just horrible how one of our featured content reviewers are leaving...lets just hope another hero will come to the rescue. Again, good luck in real life, and have a great one. --  SRE.K.A.L. | L.A.K.ERS ]] call me Keith 04:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your contribution with the FL process. Hope you will be back soon.— Chris!  c t 04:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You will be sorely missed and I hope you do return when you feel ready. All the best, Rambo's Revenge (talk)  18:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar, medal
Don't make your break permanent; we've lost a great number of people already over the last year. Do enjoy it to the fullest, though. Regards, Matthewedwards : Chat  05:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2009 World Wrestling Entertainment Draft
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Oy, I'm sorry for taking so long to look at your DYK? :( Hopefully, your semi-retirement is not permanent! We need more good editors like you! Best of luck in your future endeavors, Carpet Crawler  message me  17:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:WPPWlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WPPWlogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Belated reply
Hi, Truco; I'm sorry for my belated reply, and sorry to hear you won't be able to continue. I hadn't mentioned to you how helpful those reviews are, in particular to me, since it's work I have to do myself in your absence. Thanks again for all your work, and I hope you'll be able to return some time! Sandy Georgia (Talk) 17:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

A note regarding the WPVG Newsletter
Due to an apparent lack of interest, the WPVG Newsletter will be switching from a monthly publication schedule to a quarterly one. The next issue be delivered on July 1, 2009, and will pertain to the second quarter of the calendar year. If you have any comments regarding this, or suggestions to improve the newsletter, please post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter.
 * —VG Newsletter Contributors
 * Notice delivery by –xeno talk 15:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fountain of Time/archive2
Since you participated in the discussion at Featured article candidates/Fountain of Time/archive1, you might want to comment at Featured article candidates/Fountain of Time/archive2.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:58, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Fancruft
Do you consider this fancruft?  Raaggio  23:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)