User talk:Truco/Archive 4

No Way Out (2004)
I would like your input on something. Do you think it would be OK for me (a WP:PW member) to give a GA review for No Way Out (2004)? Cheers, L  A  X  18:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's my point, even though I would in no way be bias. Cheers, L  A  X  20:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I probably will within the next few days. Cheers, L  A  X  21:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's exactly why I decided to review it. Cheers, L  A  X  21:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Because if I didn't, It would pass with flying colors. Cheers, L  A  X  21:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * What would you consider to be "significant contributions"? I ask this because I had made some edits to the article a while back, none all that major. Cheers, L  A  X  11:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm asking you if you think I had made any "significant contributions" to No Way Out. Cheers, L  A  X  20:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup, you cannot review an article if you have made significant contributions to it. That's why I asked. Cheers, L  A  X  21:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup, you seem to have a keen understanding of how Wikipedia works, you revert vandalism, you have a clean block log, and you remain civil. The only problem I see is that you only have about 3000 edits. Cheers, L  A  X  21:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * About 9300 total. Cheers, L  A  X  21:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * How long have you been here? Cheers, L  A  X  21:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I see. Cheers, L  A  X  21:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ;) Cheers, L  A  X  21:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: GA articles
I didn't. This is what I added. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know, but I'm for certain that I didn't add those "templates" to the section. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It was this IP. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I know. I just "warned" the IP, for "editing" tests on the page. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

WrestleMania XX
Just curious, when do you plan to start expanding WrestleMania XX? Cheers, L  A  X  02:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't really mind, I was just curious. ;) Cheers, L  A  X  03:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I hate to sound like a dick, but it's going great. I currently have 26 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutrals. Cheers, L  A  X  03:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I don't know, but If you would have gone through WP:CHU instead of creating new accounts, your edits would have all be in your edit count. Cheers, L  A  X  03:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't believe so. Cheers, L  A  X  03:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If I do become an admin, I might be somewhat inactive the first few days, but after that, I should be quite strong. Cheers, L  A  X  03:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol wtf vote.svg|15px]] I'm sorry, come again? Cheers, L  A  X  03:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Well now I know. Nothing much really, I'm just making a few edits here and there, nothing particular. What's up with you? Cheers, L  A  X  03:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I see. Cheers, L  A  X  03:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's the power of rollback. =D Cheers, L  A  X  22:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't call LAX "Mr. Administrator" yet. That could signal bad luck. :P D.M.N. (talk) 22:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I couldn't tell you. I'm doin' pretty good, as is my RfA (not to sound like a dick or anything). Cheers, L  A  X  22:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I come in when I want - where I want. Anywayz, I'm off for the night. Bye, D.M.N. (talk) 22:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I know, lol. No, why? Are you? Cheers, L  A  X  22:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice. Cheers, L  A  X  22:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Cheers, L  A  X  22:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks ;). Cheers, L  A  X  23:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright. Cheers, L  A  X  23:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

HD ECW logo
In case you missed it --  bullet proof  3:16 04:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Disregard the old ECW logo skin on the video page. -- bullet proof  3:16 04:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries. Cheers!-- bullet proof  3:16 04:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

A few things
First of all, I'll be working on WMXX today, just wondering..are you free today to help out? Also, Fresh Prince totally went over the project's head in nominating the World Wrestling Entertainment. If you look at his page, he want to become an administrator already. (He has less than 300 edits). iMat thew  16:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thats very true, horrible. He just nominated Shawn Michaels for FA status. iMat  thew  16:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I know! He started a discussion over at WT:PW, go check it out. iMat  thew  16:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright. Let's hope it passes then. iMat  thew  17:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: WWE SVR 2008
Yes there is, I'll do what I can. I'm terribly sorry I never got around to doing that. Cheers, L  A  X  23:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I got it. Please tell me if there's something you want changed, I think I could fix it. Cheers, L  A  X  23:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Cheers, L  A  X  23:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have honestly replied. Cheers, L  A  X  23:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks ;). Cheers, L  A  X  23:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't really know, I haven't had that much experience with FLs. Cheers, L  A  X  23:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Cena?! Are you serious!!!!!
Amazing, I thought he woulda' been out for another couple of months. This is cool lol  Stormin' Foreman    Got something to say?  03:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

RR
Did you watch the event? If so, can you say what happened exactly?  TJ   Spyke   04:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, so we count him as elimintating himself.  TJ   Spyke   04:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * But he wasn't DQ'd since he can't be DQ's in the RR match. He voluntarily eliminated himself and that is what should be listed. There's no way someone can be DQ'd in a match where their is no DQ rule.  TJ   Spyke   04:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not factually correct. We strive to go by WWE as much as possible, but we have to be factually correct above that.  TJ   Spyke   04:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Reverted Edit
So what edit of mine was reverted for not being constructive? first time i get a message like that. Secretaria

Ron Killings
I gave you a SECOND source and yet you STILL revert it, and you say WrestleZone's unreliable. Well you have TWO sources not just ONE. -- Cra sh U  nderride  22:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Honest I don't care about WrestleZone but's on the OTHER link that I posted it was being reported that The Wrestling Observer Newsletter which IS RELIABLE, and had you actually GONE to the link you would know that by now. -- Cra sh U  nderride  23:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: PPV
I plan on finishing my part of WreslteMania and SummerSlam by tomorrow, or Thursday. That's why I've added Royal Rumble to the list. iMat thew  01:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, that makes sense. I'll stick to that in the future. iMat  thew  01:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it. I'm always open to advice. iMat  thew  01:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd love to. I've been supporting this forever, and I would be more than happy to help it finally get done. iMat  thew  01:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * What are you working on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I was just wondering. I haven't talked to you in quite sometime. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I remember this. I was still pretty new at the time, but I knew what an Edit War was. I didn't want to start off getting involved/starting up an edit war. Although I would have sided with you. Also, I just added three matches to the "events" section of WMXX. iMat  thew  02:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup, that was me. An it will absolutely be a FL. Also, you forgot to sign your post. iMat  thew  02:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe. Let's see what happens. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I know. Just like Mshake did for No Mercy. If I go, I'll take pictures to remember NWO and HBK. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If it get's supported, maybe we can ask Blue, LAX, and D.M.N. to turn these three into "The Kliq" projects. Unless you want for just you and I to work on it. iMat  thew  02:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, cool. Also, I don't think we should make any more announcements at WT:PW. We've both made an announcement, and people sometimes just choose to ignore it. iMat  thew  02:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I was shocked. I was like huh? What are you doing back? It was shocking and I was really not that happy that he won the Rumble, IMO, it was weak for him being the number one "contender". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, true. Anyway, I'm off for the night. Talk to you tomorrow. iMat  thew  02:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I know. But, I liked the showdown between Batista, Triple H and Cena. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I know, but we need an input. What's yours for SummerSlam? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice. I would, but I would like to get it to GA first. Well, according to the pay-per-view page, I'm the one who decided to expand it. I wrote the background section. Cheers, L  A  X  01:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Remember, Lex did that for New Years Revolution and it failed. I think we might want to get it into GA status first. Thought? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know what you mean. Cheers, L  A  X  02:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes I did. I was planning on sending out a thank you note today, but I'll probably do that this weekend. Cheers, L  A  X  02:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ohh, great idea. ;) I don't know either if Matt has written a PPV. He's been part of expanding PPV's, but not written one. So, which one do you want to work on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Good one. Great Idea you suggested to Blue BTW. Cheers, L  A  X  02:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd would say, Unforgiven (2006). Thoughts? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright. "Break it Down" for me; what needs to be done? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll work on that. More feedback? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Harsh, but alright. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No, no. I did find the pattern with the article. I'll fix it tomorrow, right now I'm so tired, so... Good night, Truco. Don't let the bed bug's bite. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:PW and spoilers
You may wish to read Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Archive 35 specifically the opening spoiler section and the Request for Comment (RfC). This topic has been analysed to death and debated with the result always ending up the same: omitting of information is against wikipedias core policies irrelevant of the reasons and the airing of the shows themselves constitute reliable sources for their contents (otherwise articles about television show plot lines would be unreliable even though they are simply describing what is happening on the show). Personal pleasure and wikipedia may not mix at times but this is the way it is and the way it has been confirmed to be over many many spoiler debates over wikipedia. –– Lid(Talk) 13:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This comment from Tony Sidaway pretty much summarises the facts:
 * Once episodes of a TV program are broadcast on a public network, the events depicted are in the public domain. To embargo comment on those episodes until they are broadcast in one particular country is out of the question. Utterly unacceptable. Moreover, should a wrestling bout take place in public arenas, clubs and the like before members of the public, there can be no embargo on any reliable reportage of the bout, in any form. As long as the source is reliable (for instance, ESPN, CNN or BBC reports the result of the bout) no embargo can apply on Wikipedia, and no decision made here can override that fact.
 * I know spoilers are something some people don't like, and I myself do not look like to spoiled in certain cases, but wikipedia includes spoilers and in fact must include spoilers which is the way of life I have come to accept. Information is not bendable for pleasure (see: every book or movie plot description ever which asks the question "when does a spoiler cease to be a spoiler?" and the answer is never.) –– Lid(Talk) 14:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008
There is no consensus for your preferred version. I've seen (and posted on the talk page): there is a few for, and a few against the way you want the roster to look. That's not a consensus to change it to your version. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you.
Thank you for your support not to delete the Gossipreport.com entry. We have made valid arguments for why the entry should be kept but the site has been called "spammy" and "sketchy" when it is totally CAN-SPAM compliant and we have worked really hard to create afun site that has gotten over 5 million hits in January alone. That data is from our Webalyzer page that you have to be logged in to see so I can't reference that page on the entry but I can send a screen shot of it to you or any of the other mods that would care to see it. Do you have any further suggestions for how we can keep the entry from being deleted and can you tell me who's decision is it ultimately? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seaslate (talk • contribs) 21:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

You're getting it the wrong way around....
I noticed you've reverted GuffasBurgz on No Way Out (2008). This seems to be a simply misunderstanding on your behalf. Remember this recent discussion at WP:PW? When referring the the brand it is Raw; when referring to the programme it is RAW. D.M.N. (talk) 22:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

No Way Out (2008)
The shows name is RAW. That is the brand's name and hence the brand IS the show! GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 22:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Mate, the show AND the brand both go by the name: RAW.GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 22:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am from Australia as a matter of fact. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add the SmackDown! elimination chamber match or the WHC match until announced on WWE.com. Australian TV has already been agreed upon as not a reliable source. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 23:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Just noting that this comment is entirely incorrect. –– Lid(Talk) 01:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

No Way Out
Yes but WWE.com officially lists them by the brands make it easier to be reffered to. Mas0playa (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 02:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: newsletter
If you want to incorporate a show/hide thing into the newsletter, you can try to do so. I've stopped paying attention to the newsletter now, so any decisions to the newsletter will be made by the community. Cheers, T he   C hronic  02:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The source code of the GA newsletter is not hidden or anything. Feel free to copy it directly from the page (click on 'edit this page' and copy the code over to your new newsletter page). Then, just remove all the GA specific stuff and add in your own newsletter info. Dr. Cash (talk) 05:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I think in the very first line of the code, is what you're looking for:


 * {| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 2px; margin-top: 0.2em;" (see "navbox collapsible collapsed"). Anyway, if you just copied the entire code from one of the GA newsletters and changed the color scheme and content to your own, it would work. Dr. Cash (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I think if you add a border around the entire lower part of the newsletter that expands, will help fill in the added space (see my last edit to your page -- I added a 2px border). It might also help to use a slightly darker background, but I wouldn't go too dark without a comparably lighter text color; you don't want to make it harder to read).


 * Looks about the same to me (I'm using firefox). I dunno; maybe just play around with changing some of the settings a bit, that's what I did. I find if you use the 'show preview' button without actually saving the page, that helps you to quickly test something out to see how it looks without actually screwing up the page. Dr. Cash (talk) 17:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Today...
What will you be working on? I'm going to be working on Vengeance (2004) in my Sandbox, as well as Royal Rumble (2008). iMat thew  14:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok. I think that "The Kliq"'s goal for today should be to finish up WrestleMania XX and SummerSlam (2002). iMat  thew  14:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, just for the fun of it. Would you like to help me in creating a Super Bowl chart. I'm not sure if you know what mean. I'm talking about those 10 by 10 tables where people pay for boxes and win money prizes. (We will not be playing for money, maybe just for barnstars.) It's just a fun idea, would you like to help me do it? iMat  thew  17:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I mean that 20 users can choose boxes. Five boxes per user. After the boxes are filled, we pick numbers randomly (0-9) from the left column to the right column, and the top row the the bottom row. Then the way it works: (Say after the first quarter of the game, the score is 13-21) You take the second number of both scores (3) and (1). Then, you find the column with the number 3. and the row with the number 1. The user in that box will win a prize. The prize will be a barnstar. This is just a fun game to play around SuperBowl time. iMat  thew  17:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No, like this iMat  thew  18:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, It's done. I was just asking you if you thought there would be anything wrong in doing this. iMat  thew  18:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, that is true. Nevermind then. A few of my friends made these charts (without using money), and I thought it was a fun concept. But your right, as Wikipedia is not a forum. iMat  thew  18:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Elimination Chamber
I think we should keep the article as is, and I think we should do what Nikki311 suggested we do for Hell in a Cell; create a separate article that goes into detail for every match. BTW, nice job sourcing everything. Cheers, L  A  X  21:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. ;) I think you deserve this:


 * You're welcome. ;) I think the article is coming along quite well, but I believe there is still alot to be done in order for it to become an FL. Cheers, L  A  X  21:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup, you? Who you pickin' to win? Cheers, L  A  X  21:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Same with Blue and I too. Cheers, L  A  X  21:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know, I still think you should get more peoples opinions. Cheers, L  A  X  21:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Why don't you ask her if you can create it now? Cheers,  L  A  X  21:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Would you mind reading over the background section for SummerSlam '07? I just got done rewriting the SmackDown! feud today, and I would just like your honest input. Thanks. Cheers, L  A  X  03:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ;) Well, per MOS:DATE, it is okay to have just the month and day wikilinked and not the whole date. Cheers, L  A  X  03:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Look good. Is that going to be the new format for newsletter from now on? Cheers, L  A  X  03:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

BTW, I would nominate SummerSlam for GA, but one thing that has to be done, is reduce the event section, it's way too long. Cheers, L  A  X  03:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. No, actually. That's the one thing I really need to know how to do. Cheers, L  A  X  03:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, I look over the D2D article and try to trim it myself. Event sections are something I've never been really good at. Cheers, L  A  X  04:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. Thanks. Cheers, L  A  X  04:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I know Wikipedia isn't a forum, but whose signature do you think is the coolest (out of the WP:PW members)? Cheers, L  A  X  04:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, no one's perfect. =D Cheers, L  A  X  04:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd say either The Hybrid's, or 3bulletproof16's. Cheers, L  A  X  04:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * To what? Cheers, L  A  X  04:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Come up with a design and I'll see if I like it. Cheers, L  A  X  04:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, sounds good. Night. Cheers, L  A  X  04:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, I've attempted to reduce to Kane/Finlay match for SummerSlam, It's in my sandbox. Please give me your opinion, and tell me if there's anything wrong. Thanks. Cheers, L  A  X  14:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll probably work on the rest later today when I have the time. Cheers, L  A  X  15:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I told him it's too big and bulky, and that it would distract readers. I actually like my current signature, but If you could come up with something that doesn't use a background (like Matt's design), I'd consider it. Cheers,  L  A  X  15:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

My Mega Powers Article
Hi. I got your message, and I'm still getting used to this. If you you don't mind me asking, what are refrences?

Re: Barnstar
Thanks Truco! You've made my day! Very much appreciated!-- bullet proof  3:16 05:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Newsletter
Thanks, it worked out well. Any other problems with it? iMat thew   20  08  15:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. Just checking. I'll look it over, and then it should go out today. iMat  thew   20  08  15:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it should go out today, since it did not go out last week. That would otherwise be three weeks of newsletter information crammed into one. iMat  thew   20  08  15:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Go check it out, is that what you meant? iMat  thew   20  08  18:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That, I cannot do. Sorry. I requested it's release from Misza13. It was just sent to my talk page. iMat  thew   20  08  18:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you finish the aftermath section of WrestleMania XX tonight? Once that is done, we can proof-read it and it will be finished.  iMat  thew   20  08  21:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * For "The Kliq's" next project..what do you think about doing Taboo Tuesday (2004)? iMat  thew   20  08  22:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. Can you notify Blue and LAX of this, to get their opinions? iMat  thew   20  08  22:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes I am! I'm just glad right now that I'm not a part of WP:NFL. They must be so busy right now revert vandalism. iMat  thew   20  08  22:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Btw, when referring to me, you can just say, "Me and Matt," instead of, "Me and iMatthew." I sounds better. lol iMat  thew   20  08  22:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, lol. Everyone refers to you as "Truco" obv. What does "Truco9311" actually stand for? iMat  thew   20  08  22:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, we should be rewarded for our success on the newsletter. lol. We did a great job. Also, you are allowed to vote in the polls at WWE Roster. They are both currently tied and end tomorrow. iMat  thew   20  08  23:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

We do deserve awards. Well at least you do! Here:
 * Thanks! First quarter is pretty much over now. 3-0 Giants! lol. Also, Jordin Sparks was amazing at the Anthem! iMat  thew   20  08  00:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Elimination chamber and Hell in a Cell
I don't think the Elimination chamber match article will ever reach GA/FL level. There just isn't enough information to make a detailed article to that quality. That's just my opinion, though, so if you feel you can do it...give it a try. As for Hell in a Cell, I don't think the match descriptions should be moved to a separate list. I always envisioned that we could eventually just link to the match descriptions in the various PPV articles (once they are expanded) or just get rid of them all together as listcruft. Nikki 311  19:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Adoption
Sure, I'd appreciate it if you would adopt me. :) Jjkr (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Done and done. :) Yeah, I'm hoping to be reasonably active in WP:W as soon as I get the hang of this. I understand 3RR and some basic stuff but there's so much policy to read it kind of becomes overwhelming. :) Jjkr (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I'd primarily like to learn how to properly write an article. Yeah, I don't plan to get into any edit wars, it doesn't seem worth it to me. If people let article writing become a war, then it takes away from the project. Archiving my talk page would be great of you, I have no idea how to do it. Also, do you know how to make my userpage look a bit better? Jjkr (talk) 23:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good. I'll drop a line on his talk page ASAP. Jjkr (talk) 23:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

The Wikidefcon template would be better if it was smaller, but it makes my userboxes stretch together, so it isn't really nessessary. I only can really revert IP vandalism right now anyways. And yes, any help or advice you have on article writing and editing would be much appreciated. Wherever you want to start is fine. :) Jjkr (talk) 23:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'd like to write an article with you guys. Which one would you like me to work on? Jjkr (talk) 00:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, sounds good to me. I'm always open to meeting/working with new people. Jjkr (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Feuds
Sounds good to me. I don't if I'll be able to help that much for OTE though. Cheers, L  A  X  23:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I just don't think that I could do very much, but I'll try working on the background section. Cheers, L  A  X  23:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll try working on the background, but if I can't really do anything, I'll leave it up to you and I'll work on the event/aftermath sections. Cheers, L  A  X  23:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know, you'll have to talk with him. Would you care if Zenlax were to join? Cheers, L  A  X  23:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 'kay. I believe he would. Cheers, L  A  X  00:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh, I don't know if I might be much help for OTE, but I'll help out with WrestleMania 19. And I don't mind your adoptee joining us in expanding PPV's. ;) P.S. Go Patriots. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't mind if he helped out, although maybe since Blue and LAX cannot help with OTE, you, Me, and your adoptee can handle it. (Just us three). iMat  thew   20  08  00:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * So, are we inviting Zenlax to "replace" DMN's spot in the Kliq? Yes, go PATS. Has everybody agreed to work on WrestleMania 19? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Please go to the discussion page for "The Kliq". Please voice your opinion in the two open discussions. iMat thew   20  08  01:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with you adoptee joining us. Cheers, L  A  X  01:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright. So, has anyone invited Zenlax to join? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's going to be trouble. Hopefully, not too much. iMat  thew   20  08  01:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I know. But, is anyone going to invite him or are we just going to add him without him knowing? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh. Anyways, I know that working on the RR '97, is older than OTE '98, but it is a Royal Rumble article, not that hard. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey Truco, I won't be on much today, but if you at all get the chance to, can you please try to finish writing the aftermath section of WM XX. We can pretty much called this project ours, as D.M.N. didn't write hardly any of it, (did he)? I'd like to have this finished before we move onto OTE 98. iMat  thew   20  08  11:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, and can you get me the date for when we started each project please. I have no way to find them. iMat  thew   20  08  20:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

FYI

 * Cross-posted to other Kliq members

Please see the note on my userpage. Any comments for helping with content development for the forthcoming week (until Saturday at least) will be rejected on request. I am basically taking a "Mini-Break" Regards, D.M.N. (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Projects
Hey, Truco9311, just wanted to thank you for inviting me to join your editing group and you'd be happy to know that I've added myself to two projects. Z enlax T C S 20:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll get on it. However, can you help in finishing the event section for WrestleMania 21? Z enlax  T C S 21:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. Z enlax  T C S 21:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Something came up; would it be necessary to add to the aftermath, that Triple H got drafted to SmackDown! from RAW? Z enlax  T C S 21:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

As I've said to LAX, we cannot even think about another PPV until at least half of the list (on the kliq's page) is completed. iMat thew   20  08  22:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Does that aftermath work for WrestleMania? Z enlax  T C S 20:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll continue to work on it, if that's alright with the original members who where expanding the section. Z enlax  T C S 21:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I just wanted an approval, so I wouldn't budge in and start a conflict. Also, I wanted your thoughts on what I should do for Backlash (2006) and how I can level the article to Good Article status. Z enlax  T C S 21:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I well do that immediately. As for the aftermath, in your view, what else should be added? Z enlax  T C S 21:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll take it into consideration. Z enlax  T C S 21:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'm now done with the next two matches for SummerSlam (Umaga vs. Kennedy vs. Carlito, and Guerrero vs. Mysterio). Could you please evaluate on how I've done (they are in my sandbox)? Thanks. Cheers, L  A  X  23:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ;) Now that I think about it, I agree, the ending should be changed. I'll be sure to do that. BTW, What spelling errors were there? I have Firefox, and according to that, there were no errors. Cheers, L  A  X  23:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope, I meant left, but I've fixed it. Thanks. Cheers, L  A  X  23:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Will do. ;) Cheers, L  A  X  00:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm now done with the beer drinking contest and the Morrison versus Punk match. Please evaluate if you can. BTW, could you please reduce the Divas battle royal? I'm kinda lost on that one. Cheers, L  A  X  22:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That's fine. I've asked Blue if she will reduce it, but if she can't, I'll just reword it. BTW, Thank you very much for those kind comments. It feels good to know that my hard work is being appreciated. Cheers, L  A  X  01:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup, I'll see what Blue can do. Cheers, L  A  X  01:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Tell me about it. Also, could you please look at my Sandbox to evaluate on how I've done withe the battle royal? Cheers, L  A  X  01:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I totally agree. I believe we should finish the projects we are currently on, and once were done with those, do one a week (all Kliq members together). Cheers, L  A  X  01:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Would a calendar idea work? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I know. I suggested the idea to Matt and he said he was going to work on it. So, which PPV are we going to finish? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The Rumble '08 we'll probably finish after NWO and WM. As for the other two, I would work on SummerSlam '02, but the Aftermath is hard. There's a whole lot of stuff and I don't know what to add. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Right. I'll try that or why not ask bulletproof if he can finish it. How does that sound? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright. ;) Will OTE '98 be on hold? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Idea. Can we open a signature shop for the kliq? I know that bulletproof and myself can make decent signatures. Also, how do you think that the calendar should look? iMat  thew   20  08  20:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Would it be necessary to add to the Backlash aftermath, how the crowd reacted to Cena at One Night Stand? Z enlax  T C S 21:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the know. Z enlax  T C S 21:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * What are your thoughts of User:Dlae's edits to the Randy Orton article? Z enlax  T C S 21:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiAdoption
Sure, I'd really appreciate it if you did..... Thanks! HorseSpirit (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, whats the 'vandalism' box some users have? HorseSpirit (talk) 21:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HorseSpirit (talk • contribs) 21:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Bobby Lashley Released
It's on WWE.com...

Lashley was released today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cccmrkennedy (talk • contribs) 01:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

WrestleMania XX
Is it done? It looks done, just wondering! iMat thew   20  08  02:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I can ask him, but now right now, as I have go to leave. But maybe it will get finished by the weekend. (I hope). iMat  thew   20  08  02:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Eighth member

 * Cross-posted to other Kliq members

I know this sounds ridiculous (having an eighth member), but would you mind if bulletproof 3:16 were to join the Kliq? He's an experienced member of WP:PW who would definitely help us with our expansion of pay-per-views. Cheers, L  A  X  10:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)