User talk:TrueCRaysball/Archive/5

AN discussion of your ban...
...is here.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  05:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Welcome back
Well, this isn't something I get to do very often, but I've closed the discussion relating to your ban, and there is a unanimous consensus that you should be given another chance. So welcome back! If I were to offer you any advice at all, it would be to keep a low profile for a little while, maybe write some articles, and generally prove that you're an asset to the project. If you need anything, you're welcome to drop by my talk page. Welcome back. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   09:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I've removed all the "banned" tags and unprotected your userpage and restored it to the last pre-ban version. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   09:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Welcome back. See you around. --Atlan (talk) 09:53, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Welcome back buddy! Sorry I didn't get a chance to partake in the discussion but it ended so quickly :D  fr33k man   14:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Glad to be back, though I do want to get my low profile userspace initiated before I get back to work, just want to get it over with.  † C R 9 0  (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I undeleted what I could find. If there's anything else you want restoring, just ask. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:59, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  chris †  ian rocker 90  19:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Adding my "pile-on" welcome back too. Feel free to stop by anytime. — Ched :  ?  22:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Cool :) Welcome back, Aaron! :) - A l is o n  ❤ 04:19, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Welcome back! I'm glad to have participated in that discussion. If you ever need my help, just knock on my door! :P Diego Grez (talk) 23:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I would like to note that WikiProject Christianity is currently disfunctional in my opinion. I have started discussion about re-elections of coordinators and will later take on the task of re-organizing the entire project. I would appreciate it if you join the project and participate in the discussion Here. Ryan Vesey (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Caylee Anthony picture
Hello, Christianrocker90. I saw your new edit, and remembered that you uploaded the image of Caylee Anthony. And because it was removed from the article earlier before I restored it, I felt you might want to weigh in on the matter at Talk:Casey Anthony trial.

As for placing it in the lead in the way that you did now...since the article has been titled away from the child's death to the Casey Anthony trial, I'm not so sure about that. We might get even more editors saying the Caylee image is not needed or doesn't help. Flyer22 (talk) 20:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I know it was tilted more towards the trial but she is the victim and the reason the trial happened. So I think it belongs there. BTW, thanks for pointing the discussion out to me.  chris  †  ian rocker 90  22:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Assassins Creed Wiki
I'm sorry, but WP:ELNO specifically states "Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors," which simply doesn't apply in this case. You will need a consensus to override this. Very few wikis have become accepted in such a way. Memory Alpha is the only example that springs to mind. Rehevkor ✉  01:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have several people telling me other wise.  chris †  ian rocker 90  01:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * @Rehevkor: there are many, many, many thousands of examples of wikia being linked to mainspace articles. Can you explain why you feel this example is not covered by WP:ELNO?? Thx :)  fr33k man  01:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Let's take this to a more central location.  chris †  ian rocker 90  01:25, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Caylee anthony.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Caylee anthony.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. B (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for fixing my double ref, was just looking up how to do it, little rusty at this lol. Cyraan (talk) 00:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem.  CRRays  Head90  | Another way... 00:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Haines City Crest.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Haines City Crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Wwelogo.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wwelogo.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  21:16, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Walden Schmidt
Hey, it's been about a week now with no opposition, do you think someone should go ahead with the merge?--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi CRRaysHead90. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  F ASTILY  (TALK) 06:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Re: Human conservation status
It's relevant, it's interesting (that the classification agency made such a statement/evaluation), it's in keeping with other species articles. I don't see any particular reason to remove it. Unless we should just remove the entire Human article, because of course all are readers know what humans are like, right? --Cyber cobra (talk) 09:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Go right ahead. --Cyber cobra (talk) 09:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

WrestleMania XXVIII
You should know that is flagrant Crystal Ball. And WWE is very unpredictable. For all we know he could tear an ACL and be out for a year.-- Voices in my Head   WWE  22:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure there's been a discussion on this issue.-- Voices in my Head   WWE  23:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Try obeying WP's rules
CRRays, perhaps you should follow WP's rules by not using blogs as sources. I have every right to revert something b/c you fail to follow the rules. Stop using blogs! JaMikePA (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * What you have said is not a rule though. You're telling me to learn the rules, when you're citing one that doesn't exist.  CRRays Head90  | We Believe! 20:13, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

I've showed you the rules again and again. Ignorance is not bliss! Stop denying the rules and follow them! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blogs_as_sources JaMikePA (talk) 22:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Let me try this again, that is not a rule, policy, guideline or an essay. It is a failed proposal, as such it has no barring on how the wiki is run. <b style="font-family:sans-serif;text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #9eceee;color:#fd0;"> CRRays Head90  | We Believe!</b> 22:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for the barnstar! WilliamH (talk) 19:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 2d024fe2abc5938a31edee9d55f7edca
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

December 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on WrestleMania XXVIII. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 21:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * I know we're taking care of it. <b style="font-family:sans-serif;text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #9eceee;color:#fd0;"> CRRays Head90  | We Believe!</b>

Orphaned non-free image File:TorontoBlueJays2012cap.png
 Thanks for uploading File:TorontoBlueJays2012cap.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 11:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TorontoBlueJays2012primary.png
 Thanks for uploading File:TorontoBlueJays2012primary.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

File:St Pete Times 10-16-08 front pg.jpg
I see that you uploaded the January 1, 2012 front page image of this newspaper, but could you have done so under a different file name? The file name implies that it's the Oct. 16, 2008 issue, as the old image was. The new file name should reflect the date and the paper's new name. The old image should probably have stayed around under the old file name. I would have fixed this myself, but I don't work with files that much so I wasn't sure how. Thanks. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:51, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of How You Like Me Now?


The article How You Like Me Now? has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Is this disambiguation page really necessary/ doing the proper redirect job

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Mt king <sup style="color:gold;"> (edits)  03:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * and again. Mt  king <sup style="color:gold;"> (edits)  07:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You don't need to do this as I can see you've replied in my contribs. <b style="font-family:sans-serif;text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #9eceee;color:#fd0;"> CRRays Head90  | We Believe!</b> 07:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Helmet files
Please do not remove from files, the template clearly and in bold informs you what should be done if you contest it. Mt king <sup style="color:gold;"> (edits)  04:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Mt king <sup style="color:gold;"> (edits)  01:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Simple English Wikipedia
Hello. I am letting you know that I have left a message on your talkpage at Simple English Wikipedia. I am notifying you here solely as I do not know if you still monitor that talkpage and if you receive any notifications from such. Norm andie  13:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ I replied but immediately archived it, so you'll have to read it there. <b style="font-family:sans-serif;text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #9eceee;color:#fd0;"> CRRays Head90  | We Believe!</b> 23:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks! <b style="font-family:sans-serif;text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #9eceee;color:#fd0;"> CRRays  Head90  | We Believe!</b> 00:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Prince Fielder
That compromise is fine. It's just odd to have "number" listed with nothing following it. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The number thing happens all the time, it's awkward at first but you'll get used to it as it's the standard. (I wrote this assuming you're new, if you're not, ignore my reply) <b style="font-family:sans-serif;text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #9eceee;color:#fd0;"> CRRays Head90  | We Believe!</b> 05:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I guess I'm green. Drmies (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Extreme Rules (2012)
Unfortunately not. The intention of the protection is to disallow reinstatement of the article until a day after the actual event, by which the notability of the event or lack thereof will be clearly established. Until then, relevant important information should be included on WWE Extreme Rules as appropriate. Deryck C. 07:52, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing me to the relevant discussion. I'm reluctant to let a local consensus override Wikipedia-wide guidelines on impending future events and title protection at the moment. However, I'm willing to reconsider the protection after 2 April when post-event coverage of the build becomes significant. You may want to read about the original WP:RFP which led to the protection. . Deryck C. 06:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think I understand what exactly you are requesting to be done? Deryck C. 02:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick reply. From what I see I don't think the event is worthy of an article yet: neither of the few incarnations of the article that have happened so far cited any independent source. If there is a draft version of the article somewhere which cites multiple independent reliable sources about the build (cf WP:GNG), preferably including sources from outside professional wrestling circles, then I'll consider unprotection. Deryck C. 14:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Moved (and automatically unprotected). I think there are a few errors in the citations, mostly concerning access dates, please check and correct. Deryck C. 07:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Re:Edit summary
It was wrong because you started the 24-hour format at 12:00 am local time. We go by UTC, which means that you would have needed to start at 8:00 pm EDT and work forward that way. By converting the way you did then the times are four hours ahead. And in response to your next question, we always go by UTC time for tornadoes because of different time zones. United States Man (talk) 03:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Who would that editor be then? United States Man (talk) 03:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, I already showed him how to do the coords and times, so there is no problem there. United States Man (talk) 03:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No, we can't do it because all tornado list pages and outbreak pages go by the UTC format per Wikiproject policy (although some pages of older outbreaks may still use local time and need to be changed). — Preceding unsigned comment added by United States Man  (talk • contribs)  04:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)