User talk:Truebeliever2012

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Oom Yung Doe. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oom_Yung_Doe&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove text that is supported by sources without discussing your reasons. If you think the article is unbalanced, say so on the talk page. And use edit summaries to describe what you are doing, not to deceive. A. Parrot (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm in agreement with this, and I'd like to add that "Truebeliever2012" is not a username that's going to make it easy for you to argue that the school is not a cult or that you're capable of adopting a neutral point of view. :-) My experience in the school has been very positive and I've spent a bit of time trying to make the article more balanced as I see things, but any changes to a controversial article need to have a lot of discussion and be supported by documentation and principled reasons why.


 * Basically, anything in the article needs to be presented neutrally (i.e. without regard to your own personal judgements) and supported by a source most people think is authoritative. I think that the edits you made don't fit those criteria; if you think that they do, you should create a section on Talk:Oom_Yung_Doe explaining why and we (and the other editors involved) can talk about it there. Subverdor (talk) 03:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)