User talk:Truefact1979

Yadav
Please stop removing that claim from Yadav. Wikipedia does not require disputes to be "in court". If academic scholars have disputed the claim, that statement must be included in the article per WP:NPOV. Instead of just trying to force the information out (which is called edit warring, and not allowed), please discuss it on the article's talk page (Talk:Yadav). You may also want to familiarize yourself with some of our policies, so I am going to place a welcome message below that gives you some handy links. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Truefact1979, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Qwyrxian (talk) 05:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

I checked your edit history and...
You're not off to a good start here on Wikipedia. See, Wikipedia isn't like other websites--you can't just write whatever you think or believe. Instead, all of the information in Wikipedia articles needs to come from reliable sources. If you're not interested in writing that wait (finding sources, reading them, summarizing them, and reporting them), then Wikipedia may not be a good fit for you. I'd be happy to help get you on the right track, but, sadly, if you keep just making changes without providing verification, then you're eventually going to lose your editing privileges. I'm not trying to be threatening, but I want you to understand that we do have policies for editing articles, and, if people consistently show themselves unable or unwilling to follow those policies, then we have to stop the disruption to the project. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:43, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Please note, you've actually already broken 3RR, but you probably didn't know about the rule. However, if you undo the work of other editors even once more on Yadav, you will be blocked for violating this bright line rule.  This is not a negotiable position--it is our rules. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:05, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Based on the time stamp, you did not know about 3RR before this edit. However, now that the warning is in place on your talk page, you're subject to being blocked if you break 3RR again. —C.Fred (talk) 06:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 06:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yadav, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yadav was changed by Truefact1979 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915623 on 2011-09-10T18:27:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:27, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Yadav. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SudoGhost 23:07, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hello Truefact1979 and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. ''

Your contributions at Yadav were reverted and then soon after an IP complained about the same at User_talk:Sitush in language that was both a personal attack and generally similar in style to yours. I realise that this may have been unintentional but if not then please refrain from editing while logged out.'' Sitush (talk) 09:31, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!
If you are having trouble in editing talk pages because there is too much stuff in them, there is a way to get over this problem. Look at the top of your current page. There will be a button called "My preferences". If you click that button, it will take you to another page which will have a button called "Editing". If you press that button, you will get many checkboxes. One of those will say "Enable section editing via [edit] links". If you check that box, the next time you go to any talk page, you will get an "edit" link over each section. It will make editing of sections very easy. If hope you don't mind my saying all this.- M W ℳ 00:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC) And after you put the check mark in the checkbox, don't forget to press the "Save" button at the bottom.- M W  ℳ 01:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Please ensure that you are logged in before contributing
Contributing while logged out can be seen as sockpuppetry, which is a blockable action. If you accidentally contribute while logged out then it is usually advisable to log in, go back to your contribution and make a note of your error. Or find an administrator to "revdel" the contribution because it reveals some personal information about you (your location, for example). Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Yadav. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Edit warring at Yadav
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 days for edit warring, as you did at Yadav. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)