User talk:Truefactsonlyplease

__NOINDEX__

Welcome!
Hello, Truefactsonlyplease, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Ruby  Murray  09:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

October 2013
Hello, I'm Ruby Murray. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Omar al-Bashir without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ruby  Murray  09:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Omar al-Bashir, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ruby  Murray  09:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Omar al-Bashir. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 09:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Omar al-Bashir, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ruby  Murray  10:11, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Murray! Perhaps we can collaborate on this topic. I assure you that my intentions are good. How can I talk with you about this topic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truefactsonlyplease (talk • contribs)
 * Hello. Can you please explain why you've been repeatedly deleting large chunks of referenced content from Omar al-Bashir, with edit summaries like "restructuring to make more readable", and " We want facts only here Please: Removed an unreliable paragraph". Why do you consider The Australian, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Human Rights Watch, etc. "unreliable"?  Ruby   Murray  10:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Murray, While I have removed some chunks of topic; I have also added some valuable referenced content. The paragraph you mentioned above is an extract from an Australian Journal which is far from a place far from Sudan. I have visited Sudan Personally several times and I have read other information which convinces me that this paragraph is not true at all. This paragraph lists the accusations as facts but the reality is probably different.
 * Please read Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Verifiability. We can't use our personal experience or our own original research as the basis for content here, no matter how strongly we feel about it. All content has to be verifiable, from reliable sources.  Ruby   Murray  10:41, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Murray! I totally agree with you and that is why I have made big efforts to add reliable citings to all my additions.
 * You have only added one new citation as far as I can see: . Please restore the large amounts of reliably referenced content that you've deleted because you happen to disagree with it. Ruby   Murray  11:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Truefactsonlyplease (talk) 11:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC)Hi Murray! Please be patient. I will add sources. By the way Just a quick question: where did you get it that wikipedia references can not be from wikipedia?
 * Adding reliable sources for the content you've added is fine, but you also need to undelete the reliably sourced content you've deleted. For more information on why Wikipedia can't be used to reference itself, please see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, especially the section "Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources". Ruby   Murray  12:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
This edit to Luis Moreno Ocampo uses two primary sources and misrepresent the one third party source, which states, "there is no proof that any such misconduct ever took place." Reporting only the accusation for a resolved matter is extremely poor form. See WP:BLP. Further poorly sources accusations of this nature may result in the blocking of this account - BanyanTree 09:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Truefactsonlyplease (talk) 09:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)Well there is tape recordings and proof which has been submitted to the ICC itself if you read the references carefully
 * WP:BLP does not abide suggestions to readers to "read carefully". You were warned that a repeat of the content that was reverted would result in a block of this account, and it has. - BanyanTree 09:57, 2 November 2013 (UTC)