User talk:Truefighter

Hello. One or more of your recent edits included the removal of information. You also reverted my edits, saying "for important things". You removed Messiah Foundation International from the MFI disambiguation page. I have added it back, as the abbreviation MFI is frequently used for the organization. You made similar edits with equally non-descriptive edit summaries to RAGS International, The Representative of Gohar Shahi, June 16, 1970. These seem to all relate to Messiah Foundation International and/or Younus AlGohar, and your edits are very similar to those of User:116.71.2.215, to whom I have left a similar message. I would like to point out to you too, or if you are that particular user, to remind you that if a subject is notable enough to have a page on Wikipedia, it certainly is notable enough to be included in related miscellaneous pages. Please stop with the disruptive edits, and happy editing. If you would like to experiment, consider using sandbox. Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 00:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * In regards to my reverts on RAGS International, I have turned it back to a disambiguation page as most editors agree with it being so. The only ones who seem to have issues with the disambiguation page have been User: Falconkhe, yourself, and numerous Ip's. They have refused to discuss the issue coherently, instead choosing to say things such as "This page belong to gohar shahi and gohar shahi was founder of ASI not MFI. Thus the page should be re-directed to gohar shahi artcile." I have started a discussion on the relative talk page addressing whatever problems the editors seem to have, but I have so far received no response. If you have any valid reason for making the page a redirect, why don't you comment there? I have started the discussion under "Disambiguation vs. Redirect". Feel free to comment constructively. Take care. Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 00:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; Scientizzle 19:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi
Hi. I've made a section on Talk:Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi concerning the edit that you requested discussion for. Could you please read my explanation and leave your own? Thanks. Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 11:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for your cooperation. I've responded :). Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 11:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Falconkhe. Thank you.  Esowteric + Talk  11:41, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
Based on the results of Sockpuppet investigations/Falconkhe, I have blocked this account indefinitely. Sock puppetry and meat puppetry are not appropriate. The account is blocked for one week. Any further violations of editing policies may result in stricter sanctions. &mdash; Scientizzle 14:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Based on further information at Sockpuppet investigations/Falconkhe, the block of will be extended to one month. In addition, any future violations will most certainly result in an indefinite block.