User talk:Truegardenvariety

Sockpuppet concerns
As noted on in the sockpuppet concern, your only edits have been on an article authored and edited by a flagrant, disruptive, and abusive sockpuppeteer, who has used multiple account to avoid blocks and sandbag discussions, which is exactly what's going on on the AFD.

Few others have ever edited that article. This sockpuppeteer, in various guises, has often claimed to be an academic or to be an expert. Such claims are as easy to make here as to type "I am an expert", and those have as much meaning.

As of this writing, there are five brand new single purpose accounts that materialized out of the ether to comment on an article that is obscure, not linked to anything else, and been stale for months. This stinks to high heaven.

I have noted this situation to the administrative resources here who will check this out. If you are indeed not a sockpuppet, then I'll happily remove the flag and welcom you aboard. However, you'd be the first of about twenty accounts I've flagged as such connected to this user. MARussellPESE (talk) 03:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Redacted. MARussellPESE (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Nice try, Nima. MARussellPESE (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I am not Nima. Surely I must have a different IP address from this person? Truegardenvariety (talk) 01:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Nur110 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Edward321 (talk) 05:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)