User talk:Trugoy71

Woburn
Please cease and desist throwing large amounts of ad-like and completely unsourced content to try to counter the criticism paragraph. Information (especially controversial information) must be sourced from a third party. I have no doubt that you "know" the "truth", but on Wikipedia that is not enough. Material must appear in a third party source. I asked you in the comments to provide this source, and you did not do so, though it should have been really easy for an insider (which you obvioously are from the tone of the additions). This article already sounds like an ad for Woburn, and is very inadequately sourced. Please don't keep aggravating the situation.

You can answer right here if you wish, as I am now watching this page. Donlammers (talk) 12:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)