User talk:Truklagoonwreck

Operation Hailstone
Great work on adding good information to this article. Would you mind noting here, or on the article's talk page, or in the article itself which reference you're using as the source for your info? Thanks! Cla68 (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Operation Hailstone
Hi thanks for giving me some encouragement! I got most of my info from TROM of Combinedfleet.com as I am interested in creating an exact diorama of that battle

I cross reference from various sites in Japanese and English including wikipedia itself in different languages

I believe the list are to be accurate and the attached Hanja names will help readers to further research each ships in both English and Japanese

I noticed not one website has the complete list as new wrecks are being discovered from time to time.

The same romaji spelling can also lead to to different ships names in Hanja

I have not yet look up on Dan E. Bailey's book. There should be another great reference.

By the way sorry for the horrible layouts as I am still learning to use some of the features here, please help to improve

The official chronology of the U.S. Navy in World War II By Robert Cressman

Franko's Guide Map of Chuuk Lagoon

Truk Lagoon area study


 * I added the references to the article. This article is on my "To Do" list to try to bring it up to Featured Article status, but it will be awhile, probably a couple of years, before I get to it.  Your listing of the ships is very helpful, especially if you can also find casualty figures to go with each sinking or damage report.  The list of ships should probably be placed in a "List"- style article, but I think it's fine right now. Cla68 (talk) 07:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * By the way, Japanese language sources are perfectly fine also. If you're using any, please list those as references also. Cla68 (talk) 07:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)