User talk:Trumann Retlaw

March 2021
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Miranda Rosin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

Hello, Trumann Retlaw. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 10:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Miranda Rosin has been reverted. Your edit here to Miranda Rosin was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/2130035313905321/videos/620929155240397, https://www.facebook.com/2130035313905321/videos/1108659189580693) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. .

Statements such as "Miranda Rosin has dedicated much of the first two years of her political career to advocating for personal freedoms, fiscal responsibility, accountability to the taxpayer, and increased provincial autonomy – believing that her home province of Alberta was destined for greatness." (see here) are pretty blatant violations of WP:PROMO and WP:NPOV, and I'm disappointed to see you characterise such statements as "factual information on a person". It makes it look like you have an undisclosed conflict of interest (see WP:COI). Do you? Any admin is free to lift the block if they believe all of your contributions have been neutral and you have no conflict of interest. Alternatively, any admin is free to lift the block if you disclose any conflict of interest and agree to avoid writing in that subject area. --Yamla (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Comments such as So you are saying that the sentence you provided as example is not factual? What makes you think it is not? Is that just your personal opinion? I have provided newspaper articles etc to back up. It seems to me you have a personal bias. If my las name was Smith would ecerything be ok?