User talk:Trumpillo

December 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Leonel Fernández has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Leonel Fernández was changed by Trumpillo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956972 on 2016-12-28T17:20:30+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Leonel Fernández, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

[[Beeblebrox stated:

"Whether you intended this as praise, criticism, or even just a joke is irelevant. Wikipedia does not allow any sort of username that makes even an implied statement about politics or living people, and you did both."

Beeblebrox assumed that Im trying to make a political statement or a statement of a "living person", when in fact I am not.

Im regret that he feels this way, however as an admin, I believe someone should couch him as to not engaging in systematic targeting. His decision to block me, without my consulting, is based on complete assumptions. I have placed several valid edits on wikipedia, and intend on doing so further.

However, Beeblebrox has a problem with the username I chose, which didnt denote violence or use anyones name. I chose a name I liked, and which has nothing to do with "impersonating, or violence". However, as Beeblebrox is an admin, I decided to change my username, and he went digging assumptions on that one, so I changed it again.

Im interested in contributing to Wikipedia in a positive and constructive way. However, the admins are the gatekeepers and Beeblebrox doesnt seem to like my initial choice of username, so much so, that he felt the need to block me without my knowledge or opinion beforehand.

Username rule used by Beeblebrox out of context, to block me:

Contain or imply personal attacks OR contain 'contentious' material about living persons. ]]

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Beeblebrox (talk) 13:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)