User talk:Truste56/Sandbox2

Requested Move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was not moved. This is an apparent misunderstanding of what requested moves are for. When you want to change a page, you edit it directly. Requested moves are for retitling a page while preserving its edit history. In addition, and as noted below, the changes should not be made to the article, being in general not "conforming with Wikipedia guidelines" but quite the opposite—an empty, misspelled references section, external links in a see also section, capitalization of every word, an example image in the infobox, etc. I am also deleting the page as it is a copyvio of the Wikipedia article. If you want this page deleted, which you might, add the text db-u1 to the top.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Truste56/Sandbox2 → Tommy Gemmell (footballer born 1930) – I Re-Wrote the Article And Reformatted It to Cojnform With Wikipedia Guidlines. Truste56 (talk) 23:35, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose just integrate your changes into the existing article. Obliterating edit history is not allowed, especially since you used the old article as a template. I don't see how any of your article conforms to Wikipedia guidelines, it looks horrible, so I don't think your changes should be added at all. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 04:44, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose - there is nothing in the sandbox that is not already in the existing article; and why the obsession with Capital Letters? --  Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose - no improvement whatsoever, sorry. GiantSnowman 15:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose - the sandbox version is just a copy of the existing article but with capital letters put on almost every word for no reason whatsoever. So the only thing the proposed move would achieve would be to make the article significantly worse -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.