User talk:Truth4673

edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Young Turks; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Resnjari (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

September 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Crooks and Liars, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 03:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

March 2020
Hello, I'm TheAwesomeHwyh. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Crooks and Liars, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheAwesome Hwyh  15:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Crooks and Liars. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 05:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 07:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

You don't like Wikipedia, so why are you even here?
At Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory you wrote "Wikipedia has been ruined by leftist hacks, literally destroyed a good resource. Hopefully someone will build something better, without the "woke" social justice warrior stupitidy. Go woke, go broke. Wikipedias days are numbered." You're wrong of course, but if all you are going to do is whinge and tilt against windmills, it's pointless editing here and your edits are just disruptive. Please stop. Doug Weller talk 07:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)