User talk:TruthBringsLight

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 05:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Hank Hanegraaff
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Basileias (talk) 22:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

There is considerable prejudicial editing on the Controversies Page. Primary source material is continually deletedTruthBringsLight (talk) 04:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC). This simply supports the fact that Wikipedia is a free-for-all, with no way to answer editors who repeatedly edit to promote their point of view. Easy to see why Wikipedia has no credibility in the academic world.


 * Hi TruthBringsLight. I've moved your comments on the talk page for Hank Hanegraaff to the bottom section so that they are not lost in the discussion.  Since it looks like you might be new to editing on Wikipedia, I am assuming you were unaware of this convention (which makes discussions on the talk page MUCH easier to follow).


 * Might I suggest that, in the case of the Hannegraaf page, you read the policy on biographies of living persons and neutral point-of-view? Please note that the article you linked from the LA Times was from a reliable source, and I tried to best summarize the material there in a neutral fashion (noting Hannegraaf's falling out with the Martin family and the 2007 lawsuit).  If you think it ought to be reworded, please use the talk page to suggest a new version.  As for the self-published material you wish to reference, it does not meet the verifiability requirements for wikipedia articles or for BLP's.  Wikipedia is to be encyclopedic, not exhaustive.--Lyonscc (talk) 15:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)