User talk:TruthFactors

June 2018
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ben Vereen. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:35, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Ben Vereen, you may be blocked from editing. Aspening (talk) 17:49, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

False and Libellous, Defamatory posting
You're continued posting of libellous defamatory statements will not be tolerated. Your so-called sources are not verified for accuracy or you would know the Venice Theater in Venice, Fl has verified Ben Vereen's innocence in this fabricated accusation. Why are you so determined to cause harm to Ben Vereen and his Family by refusing to acknowledge his position over the unverified words of another? YOUR edits do nothing but reinforce FALSE accusations. TruthFactors (talk) 18:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ben Vereen. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ben Vereen was changed by TruthFactors (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88991 on 2018-06-29T18:05:19+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

This is not Vandalism. This is you posting Defamatory statements against Ben Vereen without verification of the truth. TruthFactors (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * You have been warned because you were pushing a specific point of view. Per WP:NPOV, articles must maintain a neutral point of view. If there is a cited source that says Ben Vereen denies the allegations, that information can be added as long as it is worded in a way that is neutral. Aspening (talk) 18:11, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your Point of View is not Factual
Consider yourself equally warned for adamantly pushing your biased point of view. Why have you not done your research? Other media driven articles do not constitute neutrality of the subject content. They merely push rhetoric that serves their agenda. The rules work both ways, not only when convenient to your point of view. We have the equal right to add comments and content. TruthFactors (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If your information is accurate, provide citations. Information published on Wikipedia must be verifiable, and your continued posting of non-neutral and uncited information is not acceptable. DonIago (talk) 19:34, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you feel the article is biased, feel free to nominate it to be checked for its neutrality. I personally don't see anything wrong with the article as it is right now, though. Aspening (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)