User talk:TruthHurtsDealWithIt

July 2020
Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sex assignment without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 23:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Funcrunch (talk) 00:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Green Dragon Pride (talk) 00:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

My view and wording is more neutral than your choice of words. By using 'assigned' you are implying there was a decision to be made. Birth sex is observed and recorded Unless you have an agenda. TruthHurtsDealWithIt (talk) 00:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your edit to Transphobia definitely didn't adhere to the NPOV policy. You said in a clearly sarcastic way trying to make an opinion point that it was transphobic for women to want to protect their rights, and many, myself included, would argue that women who are trans should have a right to go into a bathroom where people aren't likely to beat them up for being trans since transphobic violence is a much bigger problem than violence committed by trans people. Green Dragon Pride (talk) 00:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sex assignment; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. The truth that what you're doing is disrupting Wikipedia in ways we won't tolerate may hurt, but you will just need to deal with that. Green Dragon Pride (talk) 00:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 01:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)