User talk:TruthRevealer69

I spoke the truth. You cannot claim things as concrete which are not proven. You are being biased.

February 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brittany Pettibone, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pinkshrimp (talk) 00:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Brittany Pettibone. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''You can't just keep adding content without a reliable (secondary) source to back it up. Please add reference(s) to your edits.'' Pinkshrimp (talk) 00:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Brittany Pettibone. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. GABgab 00:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an editor who is clearly WP:NOTHERE, has an axe to grind. The thread is Edits by POV pushing editor. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 00:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Brittany Pettibone. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)