User talk:Truth Is King 24

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Truth Is King 24! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 19:21, Friday, August 14, 2020 (UTC)

Your edits to Bellevue, Washington
Please read through WP:SYNTH, which concerns the synthesis of published material. While you did add a valid citation, the prose added includes analysis that is not appropriate. A good secondary source like the Bellevue Reporter or Puget Sound Business Journal would be better for discussing the number of projects and their impact, rather than adding up the individual entries on the city's project list.  Sounder Bruce  19:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reference, and I did read through it. But it does seem to me that WP:What SYNTH is not and in particular the section "SYNTH is not summary" is more relevant, in this situation. I'm not expounding a new thesis or expressing a point of view. Rather, I'm just summarizing. To me, your position is contrary to much of the philosophy of Wikipedia in that you are overly strictly using a guideline to prevent the improvement of an article. Why are you doing this? I will also just note that in wp:proveit there is this advice to editors: "If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truth Is King 24 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bellevue, Washington, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Sorry you have an incorrect notion of how editing works here, but if someone reverts a new change you've made, do not put it back. Instead, start a discussion on the article's talk page and attempt to gain consensus for your changes by arguing from reliable sources and policy. Images used in articles are required to illustrate copy. We don't use them to indicate anything. Photos should only be used when they can help illustrate a point in the text. There is absolutely nothing about that address in the copy, and a hole in the ground in this city looks like a hole in the ground in any other city. There is nothing whatsoever illustrative about it. But you are welcome to attempt to gain a policy based consensus on the article's talk page. WP:BRD explains the correct steps to follow. I know it's counterintuitive, but that's how Wikipedia works. I've been at this for almost 9 years. You don't have to agree with me, and my view may not match the consensus eventually reached. But until one is reached, the photo stays out. Please WP:AGF and realize that someone who has worked within this community as long as I have likely has a better command of our complicated structure than a new editor such as yourself. See you at Talk:Bellevue, Washington. Take care. John from Idegon (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Actually, John, there is a policy against removing another editor's contribution without first taking it talk, unless it is a case of vandalism or disruptive editing wp:status quo. If sourcing is the issue, you can always ask that the material be properly sourced. Second, can you provide me with a policy or guideline that states that "[i]mages used in articles are required to illustrate copy"? Further, I certainly disagree with you that "a hole in the ground in this city looks like a hole in the ground in any other city." For goodness sake, look at the size of that thing, with whole pieces of construction equipment inside, giving you an idea of the mighty scale of the construction. These construction projects are not only a huge part of the Bellevue economy, but they give an indication of the size of the expansion that is underway. It absolutely illustrates the fact that significant construction projects are underway in Bellevue, which is significant to the Bellevue economy. Further, wp:equality we are all equal here. I'm sorry if you feel that your years of editing give you superior rights, but they don't. Truth Is King 24 (talk) 23:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * No, but it gives me a better understanding. Would you take the advice of a medical student over the advice of his instructor? Of course you wouldn't. Our policies are purposely vague, as it has always been the intention of Wikipedia to decide everything by consensus. With the exception of three or four policies that have legal implications (WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:LIBEL, WP:CHILD and only in severe circumstances, WP:HARASSMENT), no rule here is absolutely binding. The WP:5P are almost sacrosanct, but everything else is debatable. I'll not argue the content issue here, as it should be discussed on the article's talk page for wider participation. If I might, I'd suggest you stop taking getting reverted personally. It's part of the standard operating procedure here, and indeed is a key element in our method of determining truth and other content issues. Always has been, always will be. Since the very beginning. Many policies and guidelines are narrowly focused and some are even contradictory. Not every "WP" link is policy or guidelines. Most are essays that express a certain editor's (or editors') viewpoints. They aren't binding. But many, like BRD, express widely held community practice. The only way to know which are which is, unfortunately, experience. You are of course free to do what you wish, but it would be wiser to listen. I'm not the most pleasant person to converse with, but if you listen, you learn. And conversation is an absolute requirement here. Debate is part of the process. See you at the article's talk page. John from Idegon (talk) 23:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * As an aside, there's a similar hole in the ground in Portland that has been there for about 15 years. So much has been written about it, that it has an article here. Sorry, can't remember the title. John from Idegon (talk) 23:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Killings by KPD
== Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion == This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Unspecified source/license for File:Absolute Monarchs Book Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Absolute Monarchs Book Cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Absolute Monarchs Book Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Absolute Monarchs Book Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Absolute Monarchs Book Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Absolute Monarchs Book Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Nikolai Lukashenko&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 23:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Absolute Monarchs has been accepted
 Absolute Monarchs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Absolute_Monarchs help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! SL93 (talk) 01:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Byzantium Early Centuries cover art.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Byzantium Early Centuries cover art.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Race and Intelligence
Your recent editing history at Race and Intelligence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. As has told you on multiple occasions, the onus is on you to gain consensus before reinstating your preferred content. Continuing to insist that reliable sources do not say what they say or that they are invalid can be considered disruptive. Generalrelative (talk) 12:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


 * This is just such absolute nonsense. I'm going to leave it up as a badge of honor. I made one change - clearly this editor had no justification whatsoever to put this on my page. Truth is King TALK 02:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Content alert
Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:05, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to DRN Event
Hello,. You are being invited to attend a Dispute Resolution Noticeboard event regarding the inspiration and influence of the American Revolution on the French Revolution, as arranged at the direction of administrator Tenryuu. Your participation is welcomed. Best Wishes. 021120x (talk) 12:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

021120x (talk) 12:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments go on talk pages, not user pages
Please do not post messages on others' user pages as you did at User:Robinvp11. Instead, leave messages on their user talk pages. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:10, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to Request for Comments on French Revolution
Hi,. I see that you were not invited to this discussion and wanted to provide an invitation to you - Talk:French_Revolution. The discussion will end on November 27th, 2020 and is seeking input from the involved editors. Best Wishes. 021120x (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Venetian Diplomatic Archives
Hello, Truth Is King 24. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Venetian Diplomatic Archives, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:Overcategorization&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 13:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Michael Flynn&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 16:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Isaac Bashevis Singer&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Nicholas Wade&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 14:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi Truth Is King 24! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:


 * 1) Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
 * 2) Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
 * 3) Paste  underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
 * 4) Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)