User talk:Truth Seeker Alway

Welcome!
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 15:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lingam without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''You removed cited material without a clear explanation. Please consider the WP:Verifiability not truth essay, which states in a nut graph that Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor delete content they believe to be untrue, unless they have verified beforehand with a reliable source. As WP:BRD suggests, please discuss your proposed removal of cited material on the talk page & get consensus before attempting it again.'' Peaceray (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Lingam. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lingam, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan -  Let's talk!  06:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Noone attacking the other editors. We need to evaluate the content of controversial scholars which has outdated authencity and not recognize in traditional scholars circle. We need to discuss dispute content before publishing it. Hope to agree to that part. Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 14:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)


 * See WP:RS. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!  16:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Truth Seeker Alway, please explain how Don't act like the typical white colonial supremacist, which was part of a comment you, should not be considered as a personal attack. Peaceray (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I didn't state that he is white colonial supremacist but he acted consciously or subconsciously as white colonial supremacist. White colonial supremacist is not person attack but it's view hold by many supremacist as they think that they are one only entitled to made comment on other tradition even at cost of misreprentation of their tradition. Hope you understand that Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 10:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lingam, you may be blocked from editing. Abecedare (talk) 14:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Hi, we put aside the controversial part of article which based on the controversial writing deviating from the traditional sources of information before any discussion. Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 14:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Others have already pointed you to wikipedia core policies on reliable sourcing and neutral POV (see also WP:RPOV). Please stop your disruptive blanking of reliably sourced and relevant material from various article just because it doesn't mirror your personal understanding of "tradition" or you are likely to be blocked from editng on this project. Abecedare (talk) 15:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Citation is not from the reliable sources. Can you prove that the controversial scholars opinion held in objective way. It's just fringe opinion not proof. So better address the issues instead of avoiding the question. And it's not personal understanding of tadition it's approved by all traditional scholars of all related sampradaya. If you are able to cite thing in that primary source then I am happy to accept the thing. Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 04:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
One more revert, and I'll request you to be blocked. Joshua Jonathan -  Let's talk!  06:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Enough
could you please block this account? Enough is enough diff. Joshua Jonathan -  Let's talk!  05:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Since I have previously edited Lingam, I am not taking any admin action on my own; have filed a report at ANI instead.
 * Truth Seeker Alway, you are welcome to respond at ANI if you wish. Abecedare (talk) 06:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

 * WTF?? Who is the richard. And how do you attacked the other edictor with false claims without any evidence Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 16:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)