User talk:Truth Transparency

Welcome!
Hello,. On behalf of WikiProject Judaism, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you are interested in Judaism-related topics, you may want to check out WikiProject Judaism, where editors collaborate on articles relevant to Judaism.

Again, welcome!  -shirulashem (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Leib Tropper. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 04:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Leib Tropper‎‎. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg (talk) 02:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg (talk) 20:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Look, we have very specific policies about reliable sources. In particular, we need to take very special care with biographies of living people. Therefore, we cannot include sources that don't meet our reliable source policy. This has nothing to do with any desire to suppress information. But we can't do this. If you want this to be included the proper thing to do is to get a reliable source that includes these. For example, a newspaper or such. Otherwise, we can't have them here. JoshuaZ (talk) 05:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for continually adding poorly sourced negative material to biographies of living people. When your block expires, please ensure that you adhere to Wikipedia's sourcing policies. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 05:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Alleged revocation of conversion
This is discussed on the Talk page. If you have an opinion, give it there. -- Zsero (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 05:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Warning - BLP
Jewcy is not a reliable source, and may not be used as a source on a BLP. -- Zsero (talk) 19:10, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

2nd warning. Jewcy is not a reliable source for a BLP. The Jewish Week is the only reliable source, though a weak one, for the allegation. Tropper's press release is a reliable source for his response. Stop adding Jewcy. If you don't like Tropper's response being quoted, then the whole allegation can go. -- Zsero (talk) 19:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

3rd warning. Stop adding Jewcy as a source on a BLP. -- Zsero (talk) 19:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

3RR on Leib Tropper
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

I see you have adding the link again, please revet your edit or I will make a report of your actions. Off2riorob (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I have reported you here . Off2riorob (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ⇌ Jake   Wartenberg  00:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)