User talk:Truth to the Fourth Power

Welcome!

Hello, Truth to the Fourth Power, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Farshad Fotouhi does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! John Reaves 06:39, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

January 2015
On the topic of "Not being taken seriously", when giving a stance at WP:AFD, please give a specific, policy-based reasons for your decision. Throw away commentary like this is typically ignored when coming to a final conclusion on what to do with an article. I usually don't warn people about this sort of thing, since, its not so much a "policy-breaking action" as much as its just "pointless edits that are generally discarded", but looking through your edits, its certainly not the first time you've given !votes like this. Doing it a lot could be considered disruptive, so please think about this. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  13:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for proving my point. Wikipedia: the triumph of process over substance. Truth to the Fourth Power (talk) 04:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * That's the exact oppose of what I was saying. My point was that your stances themselves needed more substance to them. Sergecross73   msg me  19:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Short timer
If you say anything like this again "Delete Clearly the work of an immature brat." I'm just going to indef block you. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)