User talk:Truthahmediraqi

April 2018
Hello, I'm SemiHypercube. I noticed that you recently removed content from Call Me by Your Name (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SemiHypercube (talk) 23:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to George Habash has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: George Habash was changed by Truthahmediraqi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952554 on 2018-05-06T21:28:29+00:00.

Edit warring warning
Your recent editing history at George Habash shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Icewhiz (talk) 21:41, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kataeb Party. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kataeb Party was changed by Truthahmediraqi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910485 on 2018-05-07T03:02:48+00:00.

May 2018
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Kataeb Party, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. DatGoodDude342 (talk) 03:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to George Habash. Thank you. Nanophosis (talk) 03:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Kataeb Party, you may be blocked from editing. DatGoodDude342 (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Yo
One of the purposes of some of the regional ambassador pages (like the one on outreach) is so that academics looking at the page know who to contact for support in their region. An academic is going to feel a lot more comfortable contacting someone with an actual name rather than contacting someone with a pseudonym. If someone has such pressing privacy concerns that they are uncomfortable revealing their name on wiki, I do not believe that they are in a position to be coordinating education program work within a region.

May 2018
Hello, I'm Javert2113. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. &mdash; Javert2113 (talk; please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 03:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Dude. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine is Marxist-Leninist. You made them right wing. Coupled with the other stuff, that means you're either incompetent or just a vandal, and both are good enough reasons for a block. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Kataeb Party. Nanophosis (talk) 03:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)