User talk:Truthchecx

Michael Reagan
Please come over to Talk:Michael_Reagan_Original_research to discuss your recent edits. I've proposed a compromise that I hope will work to resolve the dispute. Thanks. Flyte35 (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

You are arbitrary deleting properly source content. It looks like your edits are vicious and done as part of a reputation management campaign   This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Michael Reagan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

I would appreciate that you not change the format of the article to suit your own political agenda. The author has many political views that should be cited properly and organized in such a a way. If you have concerns a discussion on political views which were present at one time should be started. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuke2 (talk • contribs) 22:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * AGAIN, please discuss your desired changes in talk. Edit wars are unproductive and a waste of everyone's time.Flyte35 (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Michael Reagan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 00:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please monitor the page. People are erasing relevant and properly cited events.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 18:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Hampton Tedder (February 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Hampton Tedder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Truthchecx Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Truthchecx reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 00:05, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Hampton Tedder (February 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Truthchecx Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Truthchecx reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 00:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:David Hampton Tedder copy.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:David Hampton Tedder copy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

BLP violations
I urge you to review WP:BLPNAME. Mention of family members is unwarranted here, particularly accompanied with defamatory content sourced only by a blog. Your actions on this article in the long run have been nothing short of disruptive. Continuance to act in this way and refusal to work with others to reach a compromise will certainly get you into more trouble. Please remind yourself this is an encyclopedia, where we aim to offer reliable information in a neutral way. On Wikipedia biographies of living persons are among the most strict of policies, and violations and/or attempts to circumvent it will not be tolerated. Thank you &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  21:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Suspected Sockpuppetry
This is to notify you that you are included in a Sockpuppet report: Sockpuppet investigations/Pablomorris. You can comment there if you wish. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)