User talk:Truther2

Hi, and welcome! I must say, I reverted your edit on Professional life of George W. Bush, as it had lines like "The Profits for GW Bush and the other investors constitutes a Hugh windfall by skilful manipulating or unethical business practices". You cannot write like this, it doesn't sound like an encyclopedia when you use words like "manipulating" or "hugh windfall". You need to explain this in a neutral tone, and _then_ having people ending up agreeing with you;-) -or not. If you see what I mean. Please, don't give up, but have a look at Biographies of living persons, Conflict of interest and Manual of Style. Greswik 12:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)