User talk:Truthfinder2017

Welcome!
Hello, Truthfinder2017, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Jose Peralta, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 23:22, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * I'm also wondering what exactly you found unfactual in the coverage by The New York Times, and other sources. Meters (talk) 23:24, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay, I saw these messages after making the edits. I've read the instructions, you sent and proceed accordingly in the future, if applicable.

It is not the coverage from the Times that I find non factual. It's is the use of the article. It doesn't mention other areas where the articles mention this is a matter of payroll and what the comptroller signs. This specific section was not part of the senator's page before, and I believe it has only been added to further the goals of a political campaign. Furthermore, the press's release cited reads like an atrack to the Senator rather than a piece of news and as such makes me even more wary. The person running as a challenger to the Senator and his reasons to do so belong in his personal page. The events that followed the Senator's decition to join the IDC are varied and if one of them was this young man's choice to run against him, it is one that pertains to him. I do not think it merits occupying a place in the Senator's page for he has a proven track record of helping his community and has served in office for many years versus someone who is not yet part of the ballot. Again, I believe the portion I removed was originally added not to improve the page but to benefit someone other than the page's subject in his political career.

Thank you for your time and patience.

July 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jose Peralta, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Stop removing this material. It's solidly sourced to the New York Times. This is not a minor edit and you've already been undone once. Take this to the article's talk page or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 19:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
JesseRafe (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)