User talk:Truthhounddog

May 2021
Hello, I'm Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sasha Johnson seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 05:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sasha Johnson. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Egsan Bacon (talk) 06:39, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sasha Johnson. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Bilorv ( talk ) 09:41, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked the next time you introduce debunked falsehoods such as here and here. See Insider, a source literally included in the article already. — Bilorv ( talk ) 09:42, 28 May 2021 (UTC)