User talk:Truthisdesired

June 2024
Hello, I'm Garsh2. I noticed that you recently removed content from Randolph Scott without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Garsh (talk) 22:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I’m a huge fan of both gentlemen, especially Mr. Grant. I am deeply offended by this rumored innuendo without any verifiable proof. How convenient that all principles referenced are now dead. While I have no issue whatsoever with homosexuality, these references are meant to belittle. It’s seemingly all done just to sell books and/or magazines. Of course, saying things without the remotest shred of real evidence or facts seems to be the way it’s done these days with our politics and, unfortunately, quite a bit of our media. I, for one, am disgusted by it and tired of it (and I know I’m not alone). Thus, I will fight against it whenever I can. Therefore, I deleted this truly odious entry. Truthisdesired (talk) 00:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello! Thank you for the explanation. It seems another user has reverted my reversion (restoring your edit) with a similar reason to the one you gave here. In the future, it may be prudent to include an edit summary so that other editors, such as myself, understand that there is a valid reason for your edit. This is especially important when making content deletions, as it is often done in bad faith. Thank you for your contribution, and I apologize that it was flagged as vandalism. Garsh (talk) 00:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)