User talk:Truthisgoodenough

In Revision as of 20:47, 1 April 2007 by Truthisgoodenough

Talk Note: "Truthisgoodenough" has only ever contributed/edited/improved one individual's biography on Wikipedia and further commented the following as as a "minor edit" m "Removed link to recent WSJ smear article. See the 2004 NYTimes discussion of MyCFO to understand why the WSJ article is a hateful personal attack that does merit inclusion in Wikipedia."

The Wall Street Journal is an edited credible attribution source for Wikipedia Articles about entities, events, and objective facts. The March 6th 2007 front page newspaper article as published by the Wall Street Journal worldwide and online; reports on multiple corporations, individuals, government agencies, US Court Judgments and other US and other government actions from 1999 through 2006, including final Court Judgments (facts) and indictments issued in 2005 and 2006, reported in March 2007 article linked and referenced.

These are reported neutral voice objective facts. Each source is directly referenced (even with supporting sub documentation actually linked online) by the editors, publishers, and authors of the Wall Street Journal articles. The article itself is in a neutral voice with attributed sources consistent with Wikipedia guidelines and standards.

“Truthisgoodenough”’s slanderous reproach of the Wall Street Journal as an invalid attribution or reference source is improper. "Truthisgoodenough" asserts that the WSJ published this news as a "smear article" or is motivated in some kind of "a hateful personal attack" - this is unsupportable, objectively untrue – this article is about multiple corporations, individuals, and factual events. Truthisgoodenough has only ever "contributed" to Wikipedia unsupported subjective changes to "improve" only one individual’s personal biography presumably for “personal image promotion” purposes.

The multiple news articles and court actions regarding the myCFO corporation's involvement and affiliation in many events involving a multitude corporations, many individuals, government actions, legal actions, and Court Proceedings including Court Judgment findings in fact; are each neutral objective facts, independently reported, attributed, and independently referenced from public records sources.

“Truthisgoodenough”’s suggesting Wikipedia readers, "See the 2004 NYTimes discussion of MyCFO to understand why the WSJ article is a hateful personal attack" does not reference any article or references but some "discussion of myCFO" in 2004. This comprehensive Wall Street Journal Investigative Report Article [] is construed by “Truthisgoodenough” as a "smear" or some how "a personal attack" -- there are dozens of corporations, individuals, entities, courts, and goverment agencies reported in this article. The article is not about an individual person. References to this same news article and newspaper front cover news image of this article have also been deleted from the Censorship by Google article on Wikipedia. The objectivly attributed public Wall Street Journal reference fact speaks for itself.

Substituting some unreferenced 2004 "discussion" in years prior to actual article referenced Court Judgments issued in 2005 and 2006 against corporations as reported in 2007, is not supportable. Such unsupported personally motivated censorship of Wikipedia article references to objective sources with attributed facts does not "merit" tolerance in Wikipedia.

One may dislike articles and court findings of fact about corporations reported in credible news sources: Wikipedia personal biographies is not the place to conduct accusations slandering the Wall Street Journal's editorial, front page news reports, question their research or reference fact checking credibility, while promoting years old New York Times "discussion" as a substitute, and promoting an individual biography.

Removing referenced facts from Wikipedia Personal Biographies may please you (or your client), but self-image biography promotional marketing is not merited in Wikipedia. Facts are facts, they should neutrally be referenced in Wikipedia Articles and not censored.

- -  -  -  -  -  - Truth is Good Enough replies with the following:

Whoever wrote the above would benefit from reading the New York Times version of the myCFO.com story. It will shed light, rather than heat on this subject matter. Sorry I did not provide the link earlier. It is the only article about myCFO in the NYT in 2004. Here is the link. http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F10D16F93D540C708EDDAA0894DC404482