User talk:Truthistrue

Please support your edits to Wikipedia articles with reliable sources. Vsmith (talk) 18:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Please see WP:3rr and discuss your concerns on the article talk page talk:Scientific opinion on climate change rather than edit warring. Vsmith (talk) 19:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Do keep in mind that, per WP:Verification, your opinion as to what is "truth" doesn't amount to squat. What we deal in is reports of alleged truths, which you need to cite. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Scientific opinion on climate change
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — ThePowerofX 21:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)