User talk:Truthseekernow

October 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Advance New Zealand, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. NZFC (talk) (cont)  01:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lauren Southern. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NZFC (talk) (cont)  01:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

I disagree Truthseekernow (talk) 01:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * you might disagree but you can't just change the wording to what you want that isn't backed up in the source provided. You have to provide a new reliable source to back up the change. NZFC  (talk) (cont)  01:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lauren Southern, you may be blocked from editing. NZFC (talk) (cont)  01:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

I respectfully disagree with your opinion Truthseekernow (talk) 01:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

I will inclide sources in the future. Thank you. Truthseekernow (talk) 01:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at David Seymour (New Zealand politician), you may be blocked from editing. - gadfium 01:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Demi Lovato
See MOS:GENDERID. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 21:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Important notices
~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to David Seymour (New Zealand politician), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

July 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at David Seymour (New Zealand politician), you may be blocked from editing. `

Speculating that Seymour “ostensibly” sought to sabotage Maori people is not objective. It’s borderline slanderous and most certainly does not live up to the neutral viewpoint of Wikipedia. Truthseekernow (talk) 09:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

November 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at David Seymour (New Zealand politician). - gadfium 02:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)