User talk:Truthteller86

Other account
"Truthteller," have had another account on wikipedia? Arbustoo 03:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * RE: No. Have you? Truthteller86 12:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)truthteller86
 * I have proof you are (a blocked user). I am giving you a chance to be honest. Arbustoo 01:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, let's see it. Truthteller86 03:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)truthteller86
 * One last time, are you Kdbuffalo? Arbustoo 03:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I have already answered sufficiently. Truthteller86 03:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)truthteller86
 * You haven't actually answered if you are Kdbuffalo. As for the proof you can view it at Requests for checkuser/Case/Truthteller86. Arbustoo 17:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


 * ATTENTION ARBUTSOO & JzG/GUY**** Please see my post under "BLOCKED" below ! And in case you missed it, arbutsoo, I AM NOT KDBUFFALO, not have I never been KD BUFFALO, nor have I ever used another user name on WP. I am simply a person concerned about your mission to destroy Bob Cornuke's wiki page by posting negatively slanted material & having your wiki friends support your rules violations regarding bios of living persons.  After I am unblocked and this matter is escalated to dispute resolution via mediation or arbitration, I will give detailed, documented, sourced support to expose your harmful agenda against Bob Cornuke. Truthteller86 03:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)truthteller86


 * You are a WP:SPA inserting excluded material and adding POV. Equating a police job to archaeology is WP:OR. Removing unaccredited is misleading. An account for the purpose of revert warring is going to be blocked. Arbustoo 02:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Reversion
You are in danger of violating our three revert rule, which can lead to your being blocked from editing. Guy (Help!) 16:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

truthteller86 responds to Guy: I am well aware of this, thanks. Arbustoo and others in the anit-Cornuke camp... I will make my 3rd revision of this 24 hr period now and post my objection in the discussion. It's funny that I have not removed ANY of the negative, unsourced POV material that you and your sect continue to allow. I am of course speaking from MY POV here. After the next revert by you guys, I will then begin to challenge you line by line on the negatively slanted, one sided material that seeks to libel Dr. Cornuke, which you will not allow to be removed from his living person's bio. You should stop quoting paper thin, unenforced WP rules, which you loosely apply when it comes to your unsourced, POV negative contrib. I AM making obvious undocumented accusations against you and the like, as this is MY Usertalk page. The discussion page on Cornuke's bio is not the place for me to say such things, even if they are valid. Truthteller86 22:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)truthteller86


 * Are you aware you reverting has absurd claims that reference Oxford University, and include unsourced information? Also Cornuke is not a "Dr." Arbustoo 01:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
Per Requests for checkuser/Case/Truthteller86. Guy (Help!) 17:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Truthteller86 18:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)truthteller86


 * How is this possible a justified block? The blocking administrator links to a checkuser where the result was "unrelated." Also the block on the other account has long since expired, so this account is hardly a "ban-evading" sock. There must have been some sort of a mistake here. &mdash; Michael Linnear   02:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The text of the CheckUser makes the case. The IP data may be unrelated, but this user popped up to make contentious edits whitewashing an article on a contentious subject in the footsteps of another blocked editor. Guy (Help!) 06:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you  Michael Linnear   for being reasonalbe, unlike JzG & Arbutsoo.  I was blocked based on false accusations and unsubstantiated assumptions.  Similarities with other contributors who wish to defend Bob Cornuke against hate mongers like arbutsoo and others, is no proof I am a previous user.  JzG's contention above is NO grounds for being permanetly blocked.  Is he going to block every single new user that comes along to combat the negative, leading statements made on Bob Cornuke's living person's bio?  It is very clear that critics of Bob Cornuke have free reign on WP.  Arbustoo is not willing to compromise on the disputed text.  I am.  Arbutsoo is not willing to formally mediate this ongoing edit war, I am.  Arbustoo is not willing to respectfully and honorablly rseolve this issue on common ground, according to WP dispute resolution guidelines, I am.  So what seems to be the problem here?  I have been unfairly and permanently blocked by a biased admin, without being allowed to even comply with WP dispute resolution guidelines.  This is absurd.  JzG, I am calling you out.  Are you willing to step up to the plate and play by your own rules? If so, please unblock my IP, so I may proceed directly to request a mediation review.  I will not make any reverts, to prove I am not a vandal and not some sock puppet user.  I will allow the dispute resolution process to dictate proper action.  There must be one other reasonable Admin. besides MichaleLinnear that sees I am being fair, willing to compromise and Arbustoo is NOT.