User talk:Truthteller910

July 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mary Calvi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mary Calvi was changed by Truthteller910 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857994 on 2015-07-13T23:06:04+00:00.

Your recent editing history at Mary Calvi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thank you, DoctorJoeE  review transgressions/ talk to me!  01:10, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mary Calvi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Neil N  talk to me 02:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Neil N  talk to me 13:52, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Amy Freeze. Thank you. &mdash;George8211 / T 14:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Mary Calvi
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Mike1901 (talk) 14:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Alice Gainer
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Alice Gainer article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  18:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Mary Calvi
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mary Calvi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!  Programming Geek  (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 15:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)