User talk:Truthtelling22

Concerns over article contents
I have a major problem with the statement: "In 2022, researchers found Fitton was the third-most prolific purveyor of election misinformation on Twitter during the late months of 2020."

It is VERY one-sided, since many sources would show that what he was talking about was NOT "election misinformation" but was TRUE election info. (See the Frankspeech.com for MUCH info. Also see the movie "2000 Mules".)

I also have a major problem with this statement: "Fitton rejects the scientific consensus on climate change; "

This consensus does not exist. There are MANY good scientists out there that disagree with the mainstream narrative on climate change. See the following: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1112950/

Wikipedia is a VERY corrupt company. They SMEAR good people who are trying to stand up against VERY CORRUPT POLOTICIANS and "SCIENTISTS". Tom Fitton is an example. He's doing a very good job exposing and trying to stand up to the Deep State and corrupt gov't people like the Bidens and Fauci. Here's an example of his good work:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ew7mBseVZgk

> Truthtelling22 (talk) 16:15, 25 July 2022 (UTC)