User talk:Truthtypes

August 2015
Hello, I'm Frosty. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Stephen Collins— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Frosty ☃ 12:05, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Stephen Collins, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Telfordbuck (talk) 12:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 12:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Stephen Collins Child Sex Abuse
Hi Frosty, I would like to know how you believe that updating the sexual abuse information on the page of Stephen Collins, who has admitted to Child Sex Abuse, is not constructive? Be it his fame? A big 7th heaven fan? I find it hard to understand why anyone that has admitted and made news on sexual abuse towards a child deserves to have a clean Wiki page? I have not broken any rules and my changes were not 'vandalism' or against Wikipedias rules and I have taken this further as I believe it is not fair to be selective on information of anyone's Wikipedia, especially when the fact you're deleting is actually breaking Wikipedias guidelines and rules. You'll note the section that states all information added must be factual and therefore deletion of factual information under a false alleviation of 'vandalism' is in fact not constructive. Regards, Truthtypes Truthtypes (talk) 13:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)